Impact of rapid viral testing for influenza A and B viruses on management of febrile infants without signs of focal infection.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of rapid testing for influenza virus on management of febrile young infants. METHODS: During 2 influenza seasons (November to December 2003 and December 2004 to February 2005), we studied prospectively infants who were 0 to 36 months of age who presented to the emergency department (ED) with fever in the absence of signs of focal infection. The Directigen Flu A+B test was used to determine infection with influenza virus types A or B. Confirmatory viral cultures were not done. RESULTS: Rapid influenza testing was performed in 206 infants and 84 (40.7%) of them were influenza-positive. Infants with a positive and a negative influenza test showed a similar mean (standard deviation) age (6.86 [6.3] versus 6.55 [6.8] months) and mean temperature (39.38 degrees C [0.6] versus 39.32 degrees C [0.8]), but there were significant differences (P < 0.01) in the percentage of patients undergoing blood tests (33.3% versus 100%), urinalysis (80.9% versus 100%), chest roentgenogram (14.2% versus 32%), cerebrospinal fluid analysis (1.33% versus 21.3%), mean length of stay in the ED (116.2 [75.5] versus 192.9 [76.3] minutes), admission to the ED observation ward (8.3% versus 21.3%), inpatient care (2.3% versus 16.4%) and antibiotic treatment (0% versus 38.5%). All positive bacterial cultures occurred among influenza-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of rapid influenza testing for the evaluation of febrile young infants without signs of focal infection during influenza season decreases the need for additional studies and reduces the length of stay in the ED, the use of antibiotic treatment and unnecessary hospitalizations.

Salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulization for acute treatment of pediatric asthma in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of salbutamol delivered via a metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus a nebulizer for acute asthma treatment in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: All consecutive children younger than 14 years old who required treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in the emergency department during May 2002 (prospective cohort, n = 321) and May 2001(retrospective cohort, n = 259) were included. Inhaled salbutamol was administered by metered-dose inhaler with a spacer (and a face mask in children younger than 2 years old) in the prospective cohort and by nebulizer in the retrospective cohort. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the mean (+/-SD) age (44.50 +/- 38.64 vs. 48.37 +/- 43.55 months) and asthma treatment, arterial oxygen saturation (96.34 +/- 2.12% vs. 96.19 +/- 6.32%), and heart rate (123.71 +/- 23.63 vs. 129.41 +/- 34.55 beats/min) before emergency department consultation. The number of doses of inhaled bronchodilators was also similar (1.42 +/- 1.01 vs. 1.45 +/- 0.98) as well as the number of children that required a stay in the observation unit, admission to the hospital, or returned for medical care. The overall mean length of stay in the emergency department was slightly shorter in the prospective cohort (82 +/- 48 vs. 89 +/- 52 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of bronchodilators using a metered-dose inhaler with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizers for the treatment of children with acute asthma exacerbations in the emergency department.

Factors associated with short-term clinical outcomes after acute treatment of asthma in a pediatric emergency department.

Outcomes of emergency room treatment of children with asthma have not been well-documented. The purpose of this study was to describe the short-term clinical course of children aged 0-14 years after standard treatment for an acute asthma exacerbation in a pediatric emergency department, and to determine factors associated with follow-up morbidity. This was a prospective cohort study of a randomly selected sample of children with asthma who required treatment for an acute asthma exacerbation during the year 2002. A clinical chart was filled out by the attending pediatrician during the emergency department visit. Participants were interviewed by telephone at 7 and 15 days after the pediatric emergency visit. The study population included 258 children; 125 of them (48.4%) were <2 years old. Eighty-nine percent of children reported a visit with his/her primary asthma care provider during the first week after discharge from the emergency department. A total of 185 children missed 1 or more days of school, with a mean of 3.1 +/- 2.7 days (range, 1-23 days). Twenty-nine patients (11%) returned for medical care at the emergency department, 22 (8.5%) of them during the first week after discharge, and 4 (1.6%) required hospitalization. At the first follow-up control (day 7), 111 patients (43%) reported persistent symptoms and/or difficult breathing, and 157 (61%) were still using asthma medication. At the second follow-up control (day 15), 53 patients (20.5%) reported persistent respiratory symptoms, and 69 (26.7%) used asthma medication. In children >2 years of age, the percentage of patients with respiratory symptoms on day 7 was significantly lower among those who reported maintenance therapy with inhaled steroids (23.7% vs. 46%, P = 0.006). On day 7, asthma symptoms were more frequent in children <2 years of age compared to older children showed a higher percentage of asthma symptoms (50% vs. 36%, P = 0.014). Children <2 years old compared to older children also missed more days school or day nursery (4.48 +/- 4.62 days vs. 2.4 +/- 2.19 days). The short-term outcome of asthma children attended at the emergency department is worse than expected, according to rates of rehospitalization and return for medical care after discharge. Maintenance treatment with inhaled steroids favored a prompt recovery in children older than 2 years of age, whereas the short-term outcome of children aged <2 years was not influenced by any variable.