[Gynecological ultrasound examination at the general health care emergency department]. / Gynekologinen kaikukuvaus yleispäivystyksessä.

Vaginal ultrasound examination is a possible addition for the general health care emergency department. It gives additional information of gynecological illnesses and pregnancy. Ultrasound can guide treatment and make consulting the right specialty easier when treating women with acute abdominal pain. Correctly used ultrasound can also reduce the need for consultation and speed up treatment, especially in early pregnancy. The physician performing the ultrasound should know the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound and compare findings to the clinical status and history. Ultrasound can't replace clinical history and status in any situation. A pregnancy test, hemoglobin or CRP are often required to achieve diagnosis.

Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.

BACKGROUND: The use of standardized mesh kits for repair of pelvic-organ prolapse has spread rapidly in recent years, but it is unclear whether this approach results in better outcomes than traditional colporrhaphy. METHODS: In this multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the use of a trocar-guided, transvaginal polypropylene-mesh repair kit with traditional colporrhaphy in women with prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall (cystocele). The primary outcome was a composite of the objective anatomical designation of stage 0 (no prolapse) or 1 (position of the anterior vaginal wall more than 1 cm above the hymen), according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, and the subjective absence of symptoms of vaginal bulging 12 months after the surgery. RESULTS: Of 389 women who were randomly assigned to a study treatment, 200 underwent prolapse repair with the transvaginal mesh kit and 189 underwent traditional colporrhaphy. At 1 year, the primary outcome was significantly more common in the women treated with transvaginal mesh repair (60.8%) than in those who underwent colporrhaphy (34.5%) (absolute difference, 26.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 15.6 to 37.0). The surgery lasted longer and the rates of intraoperative hemorrhage were higher in the mesh-repair group than in the colporrhaphy group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Rates of bladder perforation were 3.5% in the mesh-repair group and 0.5% in the colporrhaphy group (P=0.07), and the respective rates of new stress urinary incontinence after surgery were 12.3% and 6.3% (P=0.05). Surgical reintervention to correct mesh exposure during follow-up occurred in 3.2% of 186 patients in the mesh-repair group. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with anterior colporrhaphy, use of a standardized, trocar-guided mesh kit for cystocele repair resulted in higher short-term rates of successful treatment but also in higher rates of surgical complications and postoperative adverse events. (Funded by the Karolinska Institutet and Ethicon; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00566917.).

Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess clinical outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse repair with a standardized trocar-guided surgical device using polypropylene mesh. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study performed throughout 26 clinics. Evaluation at baseline, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery included prolapse grading using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and symptom assessment using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6). For the purpose of this study, postoperative POP-Q stage 0-I was considered anatomic cure. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-one patients were included in the study; 232 (89%) attended the 1-year follow-up. Mean+/-standard deviation age at surgery was 66.3+/-9.4 years. Anatomic cure 1 year after surgery was observed in 96 of 121 women (79%) after anterior repair with mesh (P<.001), and 56 of 68 (82%) after posterior repair with mesh (P<.001). For combined anterior and posterior mesh repair, cure was 51 of 63 (81%) and 54 of 63 (86%) for the anterior and posterior compartment, respectively (P<.001 for both). Bladder and rectal perforations occurred in 9 of 252 patients (3.4%). Vaginal erosions, the majority mild to moderate, occurred in 26 of 232 cases (11%). Surgical intervention due to mesh exposure occurred in seven cases (2.8%). There were significant quality-of-life improvements in all domains of the IIQ-7. Despite significant improvements in UDI-6 scores, symptoms specific for stress urinary incontinence were not ameliorated. CONCLUSION: Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse is associated with satisfactory objective and subjective outcomes 1 year after surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00402844 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

The objective of this study is to report on shortterm outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse repair using Prolift transvaginal mesh. A 3-year multicenter prospective cohort study was performed in 28 centers. Assessment preoperatively and at 2 months postoperatively included the condition-specific pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and a macroscopic inflammatory scale. Subjective outcome was measured using the urogenital distress inventory (UDI) and the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7). Surgical characteristics and adverse events during follow-up were registered in a separate protocol. The evaluation is based on the interim safety analysis and includes 2-month evaluations of 123 cases. Pelvic organ perforation occurred in four cases (3.2%), three bladder injuries and one case of rectal perforation. At the 2-month follow-up, there were two cases of mesh exposure, an increase of mild-moderate granuloma formation in the operated areas (P < 0.003) but no cases of serious adverse tissue reactions related to the polypropylene mesh. Postoperative anatomical cure (defined as POP-Q stage 0-1) was 87% after anterior repair, 91% after posterior repair and 88% after total repair. All quality of life aspects measured by the IIQ-7 improved 2 months after surgery. Pelvic heaviness, vaginal bulging, and vaginal protrusion all decreased considerably (P < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in several lower urinary tract symptoms and a decreased need for manually assisted defecation. This first report from an ongoing multicenter study suggests that transvaginal mesh surgery with the Prolift system is associated with satisfactory outcomes 2 months after surgery. There were no severe adverse events attributed to the polypropylene mesh.

Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique.

BACKGROUND: Grade III and IV anal sphincter ruptures after vaginal delivery are an increasing problem. We assessed the outcome of an overlap technique in primary repair. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, from 2002 to 2004, 61 consecutive women with grade III and IV obstetric tears were included. Of the 61 women, 42 had complete rupture of the external sphincter and underwent sphincter repair using standardised overlap technique. The outcome was assessed by clinical examination, Wexner questionnaire, and endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS), after a median follow-up of 9.4 months. Main outcome measure was continence following primary repair. RESULTS: At follow-up, 64% of the patients had no symptoms of anal incontinence. A total of 29% experienced occasional incontinence to flatus, 1 patient (2%) experienced occasional incontinence to liquid stools, and 1 patient to liquid or normal stools. EAUS revealed intact external sphincter in 29 of the 35 patients (83%). In 6 patients (17%), EAUS showed partial discontinuity of the sphincter muscle. CONCLUSION: The results show that the primary overlap technique in the repair of anal sphincter rupture following vaginal delivery is highly successful.