Brazilian society of surgical oncology: Guidelines for the surgical treatment of mid-low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer in North America, Western Europe, and Brazil, and represents an important public health problem. It is estimated that approximately 30% of all the CRC cases correspond to tumors located in the rectum, requiring complex multidisciplinary treatment. In an effort to provide surgeons who treat rectal cancer with the most current information based on the best evidence in the literature, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO) has produced the present guidelines for rectal cancer treatment that is focused on the main topics related to daily clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The SBCO developed the present guidelines to provide recommendations on the main topics related to the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer based on current scientific evidence. METHODS: Between May and June 2021, 11 experts in CRC surgery met to develop the guidelines for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. A total of 22 relevant topics were disseminated among the participants. The methodological quality of a final list with 221 sources was evaluated, all the evidence was examined and revised, and the treatment guideline was formulated by the 11-expert committee. To reach a final consensus, all the topics were reviewed via a videoconference meeting that was attended by all 11 of the experts. RESULTS: The prepared guidelines contained 22 topics considered to be highly relevant in the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer, covering subjects related to the tests required for staging, surgical technique-related aspects, recommended measures to reduce surgical complications, neoadjuvant strategies, and nonoperative treatments. In addition, a checklist was proposed to summarize the important information and offer an updated tool to assist surgeons who treat rectal cancer provide the best care to their patients. CONCLUSION: These guidelines summarize concisely the recommendations based on the most current scientific evidence on the most relevant aspects of the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer and are a practical guide that can help surgeons who treat rectal cancer make the best therapeutic decision.

The Performance of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Brazil: The First Two Years of the Implementation Program in Barretos Cancer Hospital.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in Brazil. Yet, a nationally organized colorectal screening program is not implemented. Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH) is one of the largest Brazilian institution that cares for underserved patients. BCH developed a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based organized colorectal cancer screening program to improve colorectal cancer outcomes.This study aims to present the quality/performance measures of the first 2 years of the FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program and its impact on the colorectal cancer disease stage. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 6,737 individuals attending the Outpatient Department of Prevention or the Mobile Unit of BCH, which visits 18 cities of Barretos county, ages 50 to 65 years, were personally invited by a health agent/nurse practitioner. Exclusion criteria were personal history of colorectal cancer, adenomatous polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, and colonoscopy, or flexible sigmoidoscopy performed in the past 5 years. European Union (EU) guidelines for colorectal cancer screening programs were evaluated. Overall, 92.8% returned the FIT, with an inadequate examination rate of 1.5%. Among the 6,253 adequately tested, 12.5% had a positive result. The colonoscopy compliance and completion rates were 84.6 and 98.2%, respectively. The PPVs were 60.0%, 16.5%, and 5.6% for adenoma, advanced adenoma, and cancer, respectively. Stage distribution of screen-detected cancers shows earlier stages than clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer cancers reported at BCH and Brazilian cancer registries. Our colorectal cancer screening program achieved desirable quality metrics, aligned with the EU guidelines. The observed shift toward earlier colorectal cancer stages suggests an exciting opportunity to improve colorectal cancer-related cancers in Brazil.

Estudo da expressão da proteína caderina-E correlacionada com o grau de diferenciação celular e o estadiamento TNM do adenocarcinoma colorretal / Relationship study between the cadherin-E protein cell diferentiation and TNM staging

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação de uma proteína que participa do mecanismo de adesão celular com o grau de diferenciação celular e o estadiamento TNM I e IV no CCR. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 100 pacientes (54 homens e 46 mulheres) tratados por CCR, estádio I - 44 pacientes, estádio IV - 56 pacientes. Os cortes histológicos do tecido tumoral foram examinados por técnica de imunohistoquímica em relação à expressão da proteína caderina-E. Os cortes histológicos foram classificados como positivos ou negativos pelo método semiquantitativo. RESULTADOS: Para o TNM, expressão da caderina-E estádio I: positiva em 72,7 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento ; estádio IV: positiva em 64,3 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento. Em relação ao grau de diferenciação celular, expressão da caderina-E; G I: positiva em 70 por cento e negativa em 30 por cento; G II: positiva em 68.4 por cento e 31,6 por cento negativa; G III: 63.6 por cento positiva e 36,4 por cento negativa.. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dessa pesquisa permitem concluir que não há relação da expressão da proteína caderina-E com o estadiamento TNM (I e IV) e o grau de diferenciação celular no CCR.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of a protein that take part in the same mechanism of cell adhesion with the cell differentiation degree and TNM staging I and IV in CRA. METHODS: One-hundred patients (54 men and 46 women), who have received treatment for CRA, stage I - 44 patients and stage IV - 56 patients, have been studied. Histological cuts of tumor tissue were examined by the immunohistochemical technique as to the expression of E-cadherin proteins. Such histological cuts were classified as positive or negative through the semi-quantitative method. RESULTS: For TNM, the E-cadherin expression for stage I: positive in 72.7 percent and negative in 35.7 percent; stage IV: positive in 64.3 percent and negative in 35.7 percent. Regarding the cell differentiation degree, the expression of E-cadherin, GI: positive in 70 percent and negative in 30 percent; GII: positive in 68.4 percent and negative in 31.6 percent; GIII: positive in 63.6 percent and negative in 36.4 percent. There was no significant difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this research come to the conclusion that there is no relationship between the expression of E-cadherin protein with TNM staging (I and IV) and cell differentiation degree in CRA.