Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Lupus ; 23(1): 69-74, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24213308

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the extended follow-up of the CYCLOFA-LUNE trial, a randomized prospective trial comparing two sequential induction and maintenance treatment regimens for proliferative lupus nephritis based either on cyclophosphamide (CPH) or cyclosporine A (CyA). Patients and methods Data for kidney function and adverse events were collected by a cross-sectional survey for 38 of 40 patients initially randomized in the CYCLOFA-LUNE trial. Results The median follow-up time was 7.7 years (range 5.0-10.3). Rates of renal impairment and end-stage renal disease, adverse events (death, cardiovascular event, tumor, premature menopause) did not differ between the CPH and CyA group, nor did mean serum creatinine, 24 h proteinuria and SLICC damage score at last follow-up. Most patients in both groups were still treated with glucocorticoids, other immunosuppressant agents and blood pressure lowering drugs. Conclusion An immunosuppressive regimen based on CyA achieved similar clinical results to that based on CPH in the very long term.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lupus Nephritis/pathology , Renal Insufficiency/chemically induced , Renal Insufficiency/pathology
2.
Lupus ; 19(11): 1281-9, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20605876

ABSTRACT

Intravenous cyclophosphamide is considered to be the standard of care for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis. However, its use is limited by potentially severe toxic effects. Cyclosporine A has been suggested to be an efficient and safe treatment alternative to cyclophosphamide. Forty patients with clinically active proliferative lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to one of two sequential induction and maintenance treatment regimens based either on cyclophosphamide or Cyclosporine A. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as normal urinary sediment, proteinuria <0.3 g/24 h, and stable s-creatinine) and response to therapy (defined as stable s-creatinine, 50% reduction in proteinuria, and either normalization of urinary sediment or significant improvement in C3) at the end of induction and maintenance phase. Secondary outcomes were incidence of adverse events, and relapse-free survival. At the end of the induction phase, 24% of the 21 patients treated by cyclophosphamide achieved remission, and 52% achieved response, as compared with 26% and 43%, respectively of the 19 patients treated by the Cyclosporine A. At the end of the maintenance phase, 14% of patients in cyclophosphamide group, and 37% in Cyclosporine A group had remission, and 38% and 58% respectively response. Treatment with Cyclosporine A was associated with transient increase in blood pressure and reversible decrease in glomerular filtration rate. There was no significant difference in median relapse-free survival. In conclusion, Cyclosporine A was as effective as cyclophosphamide in the trial of sequential induction and maintenance treatment in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and preserved renal function.(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00976300)


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Adult , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Infusions, Intravenous , Kidney Function Tests , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Male , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Clin Rheumatol ; 18(4): 273-8, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468165

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and the effects on the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of nabumetone and diclofenac retard in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). An open, multicentre, randomised, comparative, endoscopy-blind parallel group study included 201 patients with nabumetone and 193 patients with diclofenac retard suffering from moderate to severe OA of the knee or hip joint. Twelve clinical efficacy variables were assessed and a portion of the population underwent gastroduodenoscopy. All patients exhibited significant improvement in pain severity and pain relief (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) but there were no differences between the groups for all the efficacy variables. Eleven per cent of patients on nabumetone and 19% on diclofenac experienced GIT side-effects. Sixty-nine patients with nabumetone and 61 with diclofenac underwent gastroduodenoscopy. The differences in the mucosal grade for the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum at baseline were not significant. In the oesophagus there were significantly less changes after treatment with nabumetone (p = 0.007) than with diclofenac; there were similar findings in the stomach (p < 0.001) but the difference in the duodenum was not significant. This study indicates that nabumetone and diclofenac retard have similar efficacy in the treatment of OA, but nabumetone has significantly fewer GIT side-effects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Butanones/adverse effects , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Butanones/therapeutic use , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Middle Aged , Nabumetone , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Safety , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cas Lek Cesk ; 135(24): 789-95, 1996 Dec 18.
Article in Czech | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9072297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The authors dealt with the urgent problem under what conditions it is possible to achieve in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or another collagenosis, or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) a favourable outcome of pregnancy and the delivery of a healthy infant. METHODS AND RESULTS: The investigation comprised 23 women incl. 20 with SLE, two with the mixed form of a diffuse connective tissue disease (MCTD) and one with Sjögren's syndrome of the primary type. From the total number of 20 pregnancies six were consulted in advance with a doctor (group I-s-called planned pregnancies) and all terminated by a successful delivery. Of 11 pregnancies which were not consulted with a doctor in advance (group II-so-called unplanned pregnancies) 9 were terminated in term, however, only 5 with a successful delivery (55.5%), two women are still pregnant. Exacerbation of the basic disease during pregnancy was recorded only once and did not lead to discontinuation of the pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors provide evidence that desired pregnancy of informed women suffering from SLE or another collagenosis when assisted by a specialized medical team can lead to a successful delivery of an infant.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Pregnancy Complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Pregnancy Outcome
5.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech ; 62(6): 362-6, 1995.
Article in Czech | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20470530

ABSTRACT

The authors made an open multicentre clinical study with the administration of hyaluronic acid (Hyalgan(R) - Fidia) in patients with gonarthritis. The study comprised 31 patients with gonarthritis grade II-III according to Kellgren, 30 of whom completed the study. Hyalgan was administered to the patients - vials á 2 ml in five injections in weekly intervals by the intraarticular route. The patients were followed up for another three months after completed treatment. A significant decline of pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was recorded already two weeks after onset of treatment (p = 0.001) and this decline persisted for another 13 weeks after termination of treatment. The algofunctional indices (Lequesne, Jezek) also declined after the first injection, whereby a statistically significant reduction was recorded still after 12 weeks, as compared with values before the onset of treatment (p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained also in objective evaluations (effusion, temperature above joint, tenderness). Already after the second injection a significantly shorter time was required for a 20 m walk. The mean daily paracetamol consumption declined from a mean value of 1496 +/- 777 mg before administration to 670 6 661 mg at the end of the investigation (p = 0.00006). Undesirable effects (increased intensity of pain after puncture) was recorded in one patient (3.3%). Evidence was provided that Hyalgan(R) belongs as to its profile of effectiveness among so-called SYSADOAs (symptomatic slow acting drugs for OA). Treatment is quite safe. Key words: knee osteoarthritis, hyaluronic acid, i. a. treatment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...