Application and comparison of the FADES, MADIT, and SHFM-D risk models for risk stratification of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment.

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment is beneficial in selected patients. However, it remains difficult to accurately predict which patients benefit most from ICD implantation. For this purpose, different risk models have been developed. The aim was to validate and compare the FADES, MADIT, and SHFM-D models. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients receiving a prophylactic ICD at the Leiden University Medical Center were evaluated. Individual model performance was evaluated by C-statistics. Model performances were compared using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated differentiation improvement (IDI). The primary endpoint was non-benefit of ICD treatment, defined as mortality without prior ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD intervention. A total of 1969 patients were included (age 63 ± 11 years; 79% male). During a median follow-up of 4.5 ± 3.9 years, 318 (16%) patients died without prior ICD intervention. All three risk models were predictive for event-free mortality (all: P < 0.001). The C-statistics were 0.66, 0.69, and 0.75, respectively, for FADES, MADIT, and SHFM-D (all: P < 0.001). Application of the SHFM-D resulted in an improved IDI of 4% and NRI of 26% compared with MADIT; IDI improved 11% with the use of SHFM-D instead of FADES (all: P < 0.001), but NRI remained unchanged (P = 0.71). Patients in the highest-risk category of the MADIT and SHFM-D models had 1.7 times higher risk to experience ICD non-benefit than receive appropriate ICD interventions [MADIT: mean difference (MD) 20% (95% CI: 7-33%), P = 0.001; SHFM-D: MD 16% (95% CI: 5-27%), P = 0.005]. Patients in the highest-risk category of FADES were as likely to experience ICD intervention as ICD non-benefit [MD 3% (95% CI: -8 to 14%), P = 0.60]. CONCLUSION: The predictive and discriminatory value of SHFM-D to predict non-benefit of ICD treatment is superior to FADES and MADIT in patients receiving prophylactic ICD treatment.

Long-Term Echocardiographic Outcome in Super-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and the Association With Mortality and Defibrillator Therapy.

Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with significant left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and improved clinical outcome. The study aimed to: (1) evaluate whether LV reverse remodeling remains sustained during long-term follow-up in super-responders and (2) analyze the association between the course of LV reverse remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias. Of all, primary prevention super-responders to CRT were selected. Super-response was defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction of ≥30% 6 months after device implantation. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) as time-dependent variable with implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and mortality. A total of 171 super-responders to CRT-defibrillator were included (mean age 67 ± 9 years; 66% men; 37% ischemic heart disease). Here of 129 patients received at least 1 echocardiographic evaluation after a median follow-up of 62 months (25th to 75th percentile, 38 to 87). LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LVEF after 6-month follow-up were comparable with those after 62-month follow-up (p = 0.90, p = 0.37, and p = 0.55, respectively). Changes in LVEF during follow-up in super-responders were independently associated with appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98; p = 0.005) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; p = 0.04). A 5% increase in LVEF was associated with a 1.37 times lower risk of appropriate ICD therapy and a 1.30 times lower risk of mortality. In conclusion, LV reverse remodeling in super-responders to CRT remains sustained during long-term follow-up. Changes in LVEF during follow-up were associated with mortality and ICD therapy.

Prognostic Impact of Implementation of QRS Characteristics in the Seattle Heart Failure Model in ICD and CRT-D Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) provides accurate estimates of survival in heart failure (HF) patients. The model is, however, not developed for HF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of SHFM combined with QRS morphology and CRT-related change in QRS duration in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) recipients. METHODS: All patients who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation at the Leiden University Medical Center since 1996 were included. Baseline SHFM, QRS morphology, and duration before and after device implantation were determined. The regression coefficients of the QRS characteristics derived from a Cox regression analysis were implemented in the SHFM. SHFM-estimated survival was compared with Kaplan-Meier observed survival. RESULTS: The current study includes 1,834 defibrillator recipients (63 ± 11 years; 79% male; 53% CRT-D). In 585 (60%) CRT-D recipients a left bundle branch block was present, the mean QRS duration was 147 ± 31 ms before and 151 ± 27 ms after device implantation. After a median follow-up of 4.4 years (25(th) -75(th) percentile 2.7-6.4 years), 285 (29%) CRT-D recipients had died. CRT-related decrease in QRS duration adjusted for QRS morphology was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 1.05/10 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.09; P = 0.02). The estimated 5-year survival of CRT-D recipients after implementation of the QRS characteristic was 70%, and comparable with the observed 5-year survival of 68% (95% CI: 65-72). CONCLUSION: Implementation of native QRS morphology and change in QRS duration due to CRT in the SHFM improves the prognostic value of this model in HF patients with CRT-D.

The clinical course of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Extended experience on clinical outcome, device replacements, and device-related complications.

BACKGROUND: Large randomized trials demonstrated the beneficial effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) treatments in selected patients. Data on long-term follow-up of patients outside the setting of clinical trials are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of ICD and CRT-D recipients. METHODS: All patients who underwent ICD (n = 1729 [57%]) or CRT-D (n = 1326 [43%]) implantation at the Leiden University Medical Center since 1996 were evaluated. Follow-up visits were performed every 3-6 months, and events were registered. Cumulative incidence curves of device therapy and device-related complications were adjusted for the competing risk of all-cause mortality. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.1 years (25th-75th percentile 3.1-7.8 years), 842 patients (28%) died. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45%-54%) in ICD recipients after 12 years of follow-up and 55% (95% CI 52%-58%) in CRT-D recipients after 8 years of follow-up. A total of 1081 patients (35%) received appropriate defibrillator therapy. The cumulative incidence of appropriate therapy in ICD patients was 58% (95% CI 54%-62%) after 12 years of follow-up and 39% (95% CI 35%-43%) in CRT-D patients after 8 years of follow-up. Twelve-year cumulative incidences of adverse events were 20% (95% CI 18%-22%) for inappropriate shock, 6% (95% CI 5%-8%) for device-related infection, and 17% (95% CI 14%-21%) for lead failure. CONCLUSION: After long-term follow-up of ICD (12 years) and CRT-D (8 years) recipients, 49% of ICD recipients and 55% of CRT-D recipients had died. Appropriate ICD therapy was received by the majority (58%) of ICD recipients and by almost 40% of CRT-D recipients.

How adequate are the current methods of lead extraction? A review of the efficiency and safety of transvenous lead extraction methods.

Currently several extraction tools are available in order to allow safe and successful transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of pacemaker and ICD leads; however, no directives exist to guide physicians in their choice of extraction tools and approaches. To aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the success and complication rates of different extraction methods and tools available. A comprehensive search of all published literature was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Central. Included papers were original articles describing a specific method of TLE and the corresponding success rates of at least 50 patients. Fifty-three studies were included; the majority (56%) utilized 2 (1-4) different venous extraction approaches (subclavian and femoral), the median number of extraction tools used was 3 (1-6). A stepwise approach was utilized in the majority of the studies, starting with simple traction which resulted in successful TLE in 7-85% of the leads. When applicable the procedure was continued with non-powered tools resulting in a successful extraction of 34-87% leads. Subsequently, powered tools were applied whereby success rates further increased to 74-100%. The final step in TLE was usually utilized by femoral snare leading to an overall TLE success rate of 96-100%. The median procedure-related mortality and major complication described were, respectively, 0% (0-3%) and 1% (0-7%) per patient. In conclusion, a stepwise extraction approach can result in a clinical successful TLE in up to 100% of the leads with a relatively low risk of procedure-related mortality and complications.

Epicardial leads in adult cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients: a study on lead performance, durability, and safety.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous left ventricular (LV) lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) delivery is unsuccessful in 8% to 10% of cases. These patients might benefit from an epicardial lead. However, data on long-term epicardial lead performance are scarce. Furthermore, extracting an epicardial lead requires a rethoracotomy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine data on almost a decade of experience with epicardial leads and investigate the safety of partially leaving this lead in place after device infection. METHODS: All adult patients receiving an epicardial lead (Medtronic CapSure Epi, model 4968) for CRT-D in the Leiden University Medical Center were included. Leads were implanted during a standalone procedure or in combination with other cardiothoracic procedures. Electrical lead parameters were assessed at implantation and every 6 months thereafter. In case of device infection the epicardial lead was cut off parasternal, just outside the thoracic cavity, leaving the distal part of the lead in place. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixteen patients were included with a median follow-up of 3 years (25th-75th percentile 1.0-5.5). LV pacing threshold decreased within 6 months after implantation [1.1 V (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.2) vs 0.8 V (95% CI 0.7-0.9), P = .01] and stabilized thereafter. Mean LV electrogram was 15.2 ± 7.5 mV, and average lead impedance was 633.5 ± 174.0 Ω. Five-year cumulative incidence was 1.6% for lead failure and 9.6% for device infection. The retained epicardial lead caused skin erosion in 3 patients and fistula formation in 1. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that epicardial LV leads have an excellent long-term performance. Partially retaining the lead after device infection was associated with a risk of reinfection with limited long-term clinical implications for the patient.

Super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy remain at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and benefit from defibrillator treatment.

AIMS: Mortality and ventricular arrhythmias are reduced in patients responding to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This response is accompanied by improvement in LVEF, and some patients even outgrow original eligibility criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. It is however unclear if these patients still benefit from ICD treatment. The current study aimed to evaluate if the incidence of ICD therapy is related to the extent of CRT response. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent primary prevention CRT-defibrillator implantation were included. They were divided into subgroups according to the reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) 6 months after implantation. Pre-defined subgroups were: negative responders (increased LVESV), non-responders (decreased LVESV 0-14%), responders (decreased LVESV 15-29%), and super-responders (decreased LVESV ≥30%). During a median follow-up of 57 months (25th-75th percentile 39-84), 512 patients were studied [101 (20%) negative responders, 101 (20%) non-responders, 149 (29%) responders, and 161 (31%) super-responders]. In the first year of follow-up super-responders received significantly less appropriate ICD therapy (3% vs. 12%; P < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was 31% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19-43] in negative responders, 39% (95% CI 25-53) in non-responders, 34% (95% CI 25-43) in responders, and 27% (95% CI 18-35) in super-responders, respectively (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of CRT response was associated with a parallel reduction of appropriate device therapy during the first year of follow-up. Thereafter, no association was observed. Furthermore, 23% of super-responders were treated for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias and benefit from ICD treatment.

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in elderly patients: is it justified to withhold treatment?

Implementation of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in the current clinical guidelines led to a significant increase in patients that may benefit from implantation of an ICD. Currently non-guideline-guided patient selection takes place by physicians whereby patients at higher age are more frequently excluded for ICD implantation. This editorial focuses on ICD treatment in the elderly and aims to clarify whether it is justified to withhold ICD treatment in these patients.

Chronic kidney disease and implantable cardioverter defibrillator related complications: 16 years of experience.

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has become an accepted therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, serious comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) are influencing the beneficial effects of ICD therapy. In this study, the association between kidney function and the occurrence of ICD related complications was assessed. METHODS: All patients receiving an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator between 1996 and 2012 were included. Renal function was categorized as: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >90, GFR 30-90 or GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . Registered complications were pocket hematoma, pneumothorax, lead complications, and device infection. RESULTS: In 3,147 device recipients, 236 patients (7.5%) suffered from at least 1 complication. Patients with a GFR <30 (n = 110) had a higher event rate for hematoma, pneumothorax, and infection. These patients were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes, and a lower body mass index (BMI; P < 0.05). After correcting for these risk factors, hematoma remained independently associated with a GFR <30 mL/min (OR 2.7, CI: 1.05-6.9, P = 0.04). Device infection, pneumothorax, and lead complications were not independently associated with a GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) . CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD suffered from more ICD related complications than patients without kidney disease. This was partially associated with kidney dysfunction itself as was the case with the occurrence of hematoma. However, the high burden of risk factors associated with device complications in patients with renal disease played an important role as well.

Gender-specific differences in clinical outcome of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in men and women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University Medical Center. PATIENTS: 1946 primary prevention ICD recipients (1528 (79%) men and 418 (21%) women). Patients with congenital heart disease were excluded for this analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality, ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing and shock) and ICD shock. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (25th-75th percentile 1.4-5.4), 387 (25%) men and 76 (18%) women died. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence for all-cause mortality was 20% (95% CI 18% to 23%) for men and 14% (95% CI 9% to 19%) for women (log rank p<0.01). After adjustment for potential confounding covariates all-cause mortality was lower in women (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.84; p<0.01). The 5-year cumulative incidence for appropriate therapy in men was 24% (95% CI 21% to 28%) as compared with 20% (95% CI 14% to 26%) in women (log rank p=0.07). After adjustment, a non-significant trend remained (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.06; p=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, 21% of primary prevention ICD recipients are women. Women have lower mortality and tend to experience less appropriate ICD therapy as compared with their male peers.

Effect of supplementation with zinc and other micronutrients on malaria in Tanzanian children: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain to what extent oral supplementation with zinc can reduce episodes of malaria in endemic areas. Protection may depend on other nutrients. We measured the effect of supplementation with zinc and other nutrients on malaria rates. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a 2×2 factorial trial, 612 rural Tanzanian children aged 6-60 months in an area with intense malaria transmission and with height-for-age z-score≤-1.5 SD were randomized to receive daily oral supplementation with either zinc alone (10 mg), multi-nutrients without zinc, multi-nutrients with zinc, or placebo. Intervention group was indicated by colour code, but neither participants, researchers, nor field staff knew who received what intervention. Those with Plasmodium infection at baseline were treated with artemether-lumefantrine. The primary outcome, an episode of malaria, was assessed among children reported sick at a primary care clinic, and pre-defined as current Plasmodium infection with an inflammatory response, shown by axillary temperature ≥37.5°C or whole blood C-reactive protein concentration ≥ 8 mg/L. Nutritional indicators were assessed at baseline and at 251 days (median; 95% reference range: 191-296 days). In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, we adjusted for pre-specified baseline factors, using Cox regression models that accounted for multiple episodes per child. 592 children completed the study. The primary analysis included 1,572 malaria episodes during 526 child-years of observation (median follow-up: 331 days). Malaria incidence in groups receiving zinc, multi-nutrients without zinc, multi-nutrients with zinc and placebo was 2.89/child-year, 2.95/child-year, 3.26/child-year, and 2.87/child-year, respectively. There was no evidence that multi-nutrients influenced the effect of zinc (or vice versa). Neither zinc nor multi-nutrients influenced malaria rates (marginal analysis; adjusted HR, 95% CI: 1.04, 0.93-1.18 and 1.10, 0.97-1.24 respectively). The prevalence of zinc deficiency (plasma zinc concentration <9.9 µmol/L) was high at baseline (67% overall; 60% in those without inflammation) and strongly reduced by zinc supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence from this trial that zinc supplementation protected against malaria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00623857