ABSTRACT
Trichotillomania (TTM) is an obsessive-compulsive disorder in which affected individuals recurrently pull-out hair from any region of the body, causing hair loss or alopecia. The management of TTM is a therapeutic challenge for dermatologists and consists of a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives. Cognitive-behavioral therapy has successfully been used to treat TTM. However, not all patients are willing to follow this treatment strategy. Unconventional support tools are proposed, such as electronic devices, internet therapies and microneedling. N-acetylcysteine and memantine are considered suitable first-line therapies thanks to their favorable safety and efficacy profile, low risk of adverse effects, and significant benefits. The use of other drugs, including fluoxetine, clomipramine, olanzapine, and naltrexone has limited evidence of variable efficacy. The present review illustrates the current treatment modalities for the management of TTM.
ABSTRACT
El tratamiento de la alopecia androgénica (AGA) puede ser complejo para el clínico debido a la amplia gama de terapias disponibles, en muchos casos con escasos ensayos clínicos disponibles, y con muchas de las opciones de tratamiento sin aprobación de uso en la AGA según su ficha técnica. Este documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la AGA se ha elaborado siguiendo un método Delphi, en el que han participado 34 dermatólogos miembros del Grupo Español de Tricología de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. Tras 2 rondas de votaciones, se consensuaron 138 de los 160 ítems propuestos (86%), estructurados en 4 bloques de recomendaciones: generalidades, tratamiento farmacológico, procedimientos y trasplante capilar, y casos especiales. Este documento de consenso se apoya en la evidencia científica disponible y en la opinión de expertos para ayudar a los profesionales en el manejo de la AGA en la práctica clínica diaria.(AU)
Androgenetic alopecia can be challenging to treat due to the wide range of available treatments, most of which are not based on evidence from clinical trials. In addition many of the options do not include androgenetic alopecia among the approved indications according to their summaries of product characteristics. A panel of 34 dermatologists from the Spanish Trichology Society of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) used the Delphi method to develop a consensus statement on the management of androgenetic alopecia. Over a 2-round process the experts agreed on 138 (86%) of the 160 proposed items, which were structured into 4 blocks of recommendations: general considerations, pharmacologic treatment, procedures and hair transplant, and special cases. The resulting consensus statement based on expert opinion of the scientific evidence can guide professionals in the routine management of androgenetic alopecia.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Consensus , Complementary Therapies , Alopecia/drug therapy , Alopecia/therapy , Spain , DermatologyABSTRACT
El tratamiento de la alopecia androgénica (AGA) puede ser complejo para el clínico debido a la amplia gama de terapias disponibles, en muchos casos con escasos ensayos clínicos disponibles, y con muchas de las opciones de tratamiento sin aprobación de uso en la AGA según su ficha técnica. Este documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la AGA se ha elaborado siguiendo un método Delphi, en el que han participado 34 dermatólogos miembros del Grupo Español de Tricología de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. Tras 2 rondas de votaciones, se consensuaron 138 de los 160 ítems propuestos (86%), estructurados en 4 bloques de recomendaciones: generalidades, tratamiento farmacológico, procedimientos y trasplante capilar, y casos especiales. Este documento de consenso se apoya en la evidencia científica disponible y en la opinión de expertos para ayudar a los profesionales en el manejo de la AGA en la práctica clínica diaria.(AU)
Androgenetic alopecia can be challenging to treat due to the wide range of available treatments, most of which are not based on evidence from clinical trials. In addition many of the options do not include androgenetic alopecia among the approved indications according to their summaries of product characteristics. A panel of 34 dermatologists from the Spanish Trichology Society of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) used the Delphi method to develop a consensus statement on the management of androgenetic alopecia. Over a 2-round process the experts agreed on 138 (86%) of the 160 proposed items, which were structured into 4 blocks of recommendations: general considerations, pharmacologic treatment, procedures and hair transplant, and special cases. The resulting consensus statement based on expert opinion of the scientific evidence can guide professionals in the routine management of androgenetic alopecia.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Spain , DermatologySubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dermatology , Skin Diseases , Minoxidil/adverse effects , Small Doses , Hair , AlopeciaSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dermatology , Skin Diseases , Minoxidil/adverse effects , Small Doses , Hair , AlopeciaABSTRACT
Androgenetic alopecia can be challenging to treat due to the wide range of available treatments, most of which are not based on evidence from clinical trials. In addition many of the options do not include androgenetic alopecia among the approved indications according to their summaries of product characteristics. A panel of 34 dermatologists from the Spanish Hair Disorders Society of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) used the Delphi method to develop a consensus statement on the management of androgenetic alopecia. Over a 2-round process the experts agreed on 138 (86%) of the 160 proposed items, which were structured into 4 blocks of recommendations: general considerations, pharmacologic treatment, procedures and hair transplant, and special cases. The resulting consensus statement based on expert opinion of the scientific evidence can guide professionals in the routine management of androgenetic alopecia.
Subject(s)
Dermatology , Humans , Alopecia/drug therapy , Academies and Institutes , Consensus , HairABSTRACT
Alopecia areata is an autoimmune form of non-scarring hair loss. It is usually characterized by limited areas of hair loss. However, the disease may progress to complete scalp and body hair loss (alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis). In patients with alopecia areata hair loss significantly impacts the quality of life. Children and adolescents with alopecia areata often experience bullying, including physical aggression. The disease severity evaluation tools used in clinical practice are: the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and the Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS). A SALT score equal to or greater than 20 constitutes a commonly accepted indication for systemic therapy in alopecia areata. When using the AAS, moderate to severe alopecia areata should be considered a medical indication for systemic treatment. Currently, the only two EMA-approved medications for alopecia areata are baricitinib (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) for adults and ritlecitinib (JAK 3/TEC inhibitor) for individuals aged 12 and older. Both are EMA-approved for patients with severe alopecia areata. Other systemic medications used off-label in alopecia areata include glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate and azathioprine. Oral minoxidil is considered an adjuvant therapy with limited data confirming its possible efficacy. This consensus statement is to outline a systemic treatment algorithm for alopecia areata, indications for systemic treatment, available therapeutic options, their efficacy and safety, as well as the duration of the therapy.
Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Adult , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Alopecia/drug therapy , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Systemic adverse effects (AE) are a major concern of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) treatment, especially in patients with arterial hypertension or arrhythmia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of LDOM in patients with hypertension or arrhythmia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of patients with hypertension or arrhythmia treated with LDOM for any type of alopecia. RESULTS: A total of 254 patients with hypertension [176 women (69.3%) and 78 men (30.7%)] with a mean age of 56.9 years (range 19-82) were included. From them, the dose of LDOM was titrated in 128 patients, allowing the analysis of 382 doses. Patients were receiving a mean of 1.45 (range 0-5) antihypertensive drugs. Systemic AE were detected in 26 cases (6.8%) and included lightheadedness (3.1%), fluid retention (2.6%), general malaise (0.8%), tachycardia (0.8%) and headache (0.5%), leading to LDOM discontinuation in 6 cases (1.5%). Prior treatment with doxazosin (P<0.001), or with three or more antihypertensive drugs (P=0.012) was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of LDOM. CONCLUSIONS: LDOM treatment showed a favorable safety profile in patients with hypertension or arrhythmia, similar to general population.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Minoxidil , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Alopecia/drug therapy , Alopecia/chemically induced , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Minoxidil/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Systemic adverse effects (AE) are a major concern of low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) treatment, especially in patients with arterial hypertension or arrhythmia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of LDOM in patients with hypertension or arrhythmia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of patients with hypertension or arrhythmia treated with LDOM for any type of alopecia. RESULTS: A total of 254 patients with hypertension [176 women (69.3%) and 78 men (30.7%)] with a mean age of 56.9 years (range 19-82) were included. From them, the dose of LDOM was titrated in 128 patients, allowing the analysis of 382 doses. Patients were receiving a mean of 1.45 (range 0-5) antihypertensive drugs. Systemic AE were detected in 26 cases (6.8%) and included lightheadedness (3.1%), fluid retention (2.6%), general malaise (0.8%), tachycardia (0.8%) and headache (0.5%), leading to LDOM discontinuation in 6 cases (1.5%). Prior treatment with doxazosin (P<0.001), or with three or more antihypertensive drugs (P=0.012) was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of LDOM. CONCLUSIONS: LDOM treatment showed a favorable safety profile in patients with hypertension or arrhythmia, similar to general population.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Minoxidil , Male , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Minoxidil/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Alopecia/drug therapy , Alopecia/chemically induced , Hypertension/drug therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Androgenetic alopecia can be challenging to treat due to the wide range of available treatments, most of which are not based on evidence from clinical trials. In addition many of the options do not include androgenetic alopecia among the approved indications according to their summaries of product characteristics. A panel of 34 dermatologists from the Spanish Trichology Society of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) used the Delphi method to develop a consensus statement on the management of androgenetic alopecia. Over a 2-round process the experts agreed on 138 (86%) of the 160 proposed items, which were structured into 4 blocks of recommendations: general considerations, pharmacologic treatment, procedures and hair transplant, and special cases. The resulting consensus statement based on expert opinion of the scientific evidence can guide professionals in the routine management of androgenetic alopecia.
Subject(s)
Dermatology , Venereology , Humans , Alopecia/drug therapy , Academies and Institutes , ConsensusABSTRACT
AIM: To achieve international expert consensus and give recommendations on best practices in hair transplantation surgery, focusing on pre- and post-transplantation care. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus. An international scientific committee developed an 81-statement questionnaire. A panel of 38 experts in hair transplantation from 17 countries across 4 continents assessed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Two consensus rounds were carried out, with 59 out of 81 statements (73%) reaching consensus. Expert recommendations emphasize the correct selection of candidates for hair transplantation and the need for patients to have received adequate medical treatment for alopecia before transplant. Comorbidities should be assessed and considered while planning surgery, and an individualized plan for perioperative care should be drawn up before transplant. Certain medications associated with increased risk of bleeding should be withdrawn before surgery. Specific recommendations for post-transplantation care are given. After transplantation, patients should gradually resume their normal haircare regimen. Close follow-up should be carried out during the first year after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents numerous consensus-based recommendations on general aspects of hair transplantation, including candidate selection, medical therapy prior to transplantation, anesthesia, and resuming haircare after transplantation.
