ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article aims to determine how Alzheimer's disease (AD) framing impacts on attitudes and self-reported emotions towards the disease. METHODS: We designed posters with framed messages based on the person with AD: Dualism of body and mind, Unity of body and mind, and control (Study 1, N = 261) and based on the relationship person with AD-family: No reciprocation, Good Mother, and control (Study 2, N = 240). To analyse the effect of the different frames, attitudes towards AD were measured twice (before and after the posters display). Emotions emerging from this exposure were also recorded. RESULTS: Data analysis yielded four significant findings regarding communication on AD: (1) deproblematizing frames (i.e., Unity of body and mind and Good Mother) lead to a positive attitude change; (2) Non reciprocation frame reduces positive attitudes; (3) problematizing frames (i.e., Dualism body and mind and Non reciprocation) trigger negative emotions; (4) deproblematizing frames induce higher positive feelings, which increase positive attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Negative representations about AD reinforce the negative attitudes towards it. Reframing AD is essential to achieve a positive attitudinal change. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The use of deproblematizing frames (i.e., Unity of body and mind or Good Mother) should be considered when developing and implementing policies targeted at communication and awareness of AD to reduce the stigma associated with this disease.
ABSTRACT
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are associated to social attention (SA) impairments. A gaze bias to non-social objects over faces has been proposed as an early marker of ASD. This bias may be related to the concomitant circumscribed interests (CI), which question the role of competing objects in this atypical visual behavior. The aim of this study was to compare visual attention patterns to social and non-social images in young children with ASD and matched typical controls (N = 36; age range 41-73 months) assessing the role of emotion in facial stimuli and the type of competing object. A paired preference task was designed pairing happy, angry, and neutral faces with two types of objects (related or not related to autism CI). Eye tracking data were collected, and three indexes were considered as dependent variables: prioritization (attentional orientation), preference, and duration (sustained attention). Results showed that both groups had similar visual pattern to faces (prioritization, more attention and longer visits to faces paired with objects non-related to their CI); however, the ASD group attended to faces significantly less than controls. Children with ASD showed an emotional bias (late orientation to angry faces and typical preference for happy faces). Finally, objects related to their CI captured attention in both groups, significantly reducing SA in children with ASD. Atypical SA is present in young children with ASD regardless the competing non-social object. Identifying strengths and difficulties in SA in this population may have substantial repercussion for early diagnosis, intervention, and ultimately prognosis.
