Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
J Med Screen ; 30(2): 92-95, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36071630

ABSTRACT

Controversy surrounding recommendations for supplemental screening (ultrasound and magnetic resonance screening) in women with dense breasts exists, as the long-term benefits from these additional modalities may not outweigh the harms. This study aimed to examine factors associated with supplemental screening intentions following a hypothetical breast density notification in a population of women who have not been routinely notified. Australian women of breast screening age participated in an online randomised experimental study where they were presented with one of two breast density notifications (with or without health literacy-sensitive information) and asked their screening intentions. After adjusting for covariates in multivariable analyses, women in both groups (n = 940) who indicated higher levels of breast cancer worry, had private health insurance, had a family history of breast cancer, and had a greater number of times previously attending mammography screening had higher intentions for supplemental screening. Understanding women's supplemental screening intentions following notification of dense breasts has important implications for health systems with breast screening considering the impacts of widespread notification. Personal, clinical and psychological factors should be considered when discussing both the benefits and harms of supplemental screening with women with dense breasts.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Australia , Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Intention , Mammography , Mass Screening
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35897399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence around Australian general practitioners' (GPs) views of issues surrounding breast density. The current study aimed to quantitatively assess GPs' current knowledge, understanding, and feelings around breast density information and notification. METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional survey using an online platform to collect quantitative data from Australian GPs. Survey data were analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total 60 responses from GPs were analysed. Most (n = 58; 97%) had heard or read about breast density and nearly 90% (n = 52; 87%) have had discussions about breast density with patients. Three-quarters (n = 45; 75%) were supportive of making breast density notification mandatory for patients with dense tissue and a similar proportion (n = 45/58; 78%) felt they need or want more education on breast density. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong support for notifying patients of breast density, and interest in further education and training among the surveyed GPs. As GPs play a central role in cancer prevention and control, their involvement in discussions related to breast density notification, evaluation and appraisal of evidence, development of communication strategies, and participation in ongoing research on the topic will be indispensable.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Attitude of Health Personnel , Australia , Breast Density , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emotions , Humans
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(6): e2216784, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35708691

ABSTRACT

Importance: Whether the benefits of notifying women about breast density outweigh the potential harms to inform current and future mammogram screening practice remains unknown. Objective: To assess the effect of mammographic breast density notification and information provision on women's intention to seek supplemental screening and psychological outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 3-arm online randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 10 to 31, 2021. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 20, 2021. Participants included Australian residents identifying as female, aged between 40 and 74 years, with no history of breast cancer who were residing in jurisdictions without existing breast density notification with screening mammograms. Interventions: Women were randomized to receive 1 of the following hypothetical breast screening test result letters: screening mammogram result letter without breast density messaging (control), screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and an existing density information letter taken from a screening service in Australia (intervention 1), and screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and a health literacy-sensitive version of the letter adapted for people with lower health literacy (intervention 2). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were intention to seek supplemental screening; feeling anxious (uneasy, worried, or nervous), informed, or confused; and having breast cancer worry. Results: A total of 1420 Australian women were randomized and included in the final analysis. The largest group consisted of 603 women aged 60 to 74 years (42.5%). Compared with the control cohort (n = 480), women who received density notification via intervention 1 (n = 470) and intervention 2 (n = 470) reported a significantly higher intention to seek supplemental screening (0.8% vs 15.6% and 14.2%; P < .001) and feeling anxious (14.2% vs 49.4% and 48.5%; P < .001), confusion (7.8% vs 24.0% and 23.6%; P < .001), and worry about breast cancer (quite/very worried: 6.9% vs 17.2% and 15.5%; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in these outcomes between the 2 intervention groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, breast density notification and information integrated with screening mammogram results increased women's intention to seek supplemental screening and made women feel anxious, confused, or worried about breast cancer. These findings have relevance and implications for mammogram screening services and policy makers considering whether and, if so, how best to implement widespread notification of breast density as part of mammography screening. Trial Registration: ACTRN12621000253808.


Subject(s)
Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Australia , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Humans , Intention , Mammography , Middle Aged
4.
Breast ; 65: 23-31, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast density has become a topic of international discussion due to its associated risk of breast cancer. As online is often a primary source of women's health information it is therefore essential that breast density information it is understandable, accurate and reflects the best available evidence. This study aimed to systematically assess online international breast density information including recommendations to women. METHODS: Searches were conducted from five different English-speaking country-specific Google locations. Relevant breast density information was extracted from the identified websites. Readability was assessed using the SHeLL Editor, and understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). A content analysis of specific recommendations to women was also conducted. RESULTS: Forty-two eligible websites were identified and systematically assessed. The included informational content varied across websites. The average grade reading level across all websites was 12.4 (range 8.9-15.4). The mean understandability was 69.9% and the mean actionability was 40.1%, with 18/42 and 39/42 websites respectively scoring lower than adequate (70%). Thirty-six (85.7%) of the websites had breast density-related recommendation to women, with 'talk to your doctor' (n = 33, 78.6%) the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Online information about breast density varies widely and is not generally presented in a way that women can easily understand and act on, therefore greatly reducing the ability for informed decision-making. International organisations and groups disseminating breast density information need to ensure that women are presented with health literacy-sensitive and balanced information, and be aware of the impact that recommendations may have on practice.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Health Literacy , Breast Density , Comprehension , Female , Humans , Internet
5.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(3): 632-640, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34238650

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore Australian women's current knowledge, perspectives and attitudes about breast density (BD); and information needs to inform effective evidence-based communication strategies. METHODS: Fourteen online focus group sessions with a total of 78 women in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia aged 40-74 years without a personal diagnosis of breast cancer were conducted. Audio-recorded data was transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Women had a very limited knowledge of BD. Overall, women expressed a preference for more frequent mammograms and/or supplemental screening should they be told they had dense breasts, despite being presented with information on potential downsides of additional testing. The majority of women were supportive of the notion of BD notification, often suggesting they had a 'right to know' and they would prefer to be educated and informed about it. CONCLUSION: The potential of being informed and notified of BD is found to be of interest and importance to Australian women of breast screening age despite lacking current knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights that policy makers and screening services need to consider how to weigh up these views and preferences of women with current evidence surrounding BD in deciding about implementing population-based BD notification.


Subject(s)
Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Australia , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Focus Groups , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged
6.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 9(4): 397-403, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537578

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Assessing whether interventions are implemented as intended (fidelity) is critical to establishing efficacy in clinical research yet rarely applied in advance care planning (ACP) interventions. We aimed to develop and implement a fidelity audit tool for an ACP intervention. METHODS: We developed a fidelity audit tool assessing: (A) content; (B) quality (general communication, eliciting EOL preferences and prognostic communication); and (C) family/caregiver involvement. We audited (double-coded) 55 audio-recordings of ACP discussions delivered to advanced cancer patients and caregivers, within a clinical trial. RESULTS: Fidelity to content was high: mean=9.38/11 but lower for the quality of general communication (mean=12.47/20), discussion of patient preferences (mean=4.67/7), prognosis (mean=3.9/6) and family/caregiver involvement (mean=2.67/4). Older patient age and caregiver religiosity were associated with higher fidelity. Higher fidelity to content was associated with the trial primary outcome of family caregiver report of patient wishes being discussed and met. CONCLUSIONS: Fidelity to content, but not quality, of the ACP intervention is strong. Communication skills training is critical for ACP interventionists. Adherence was higher with older patients and religious carers, factors that may influence acceptance of death and readiness to undertake ACP, making the discussion easier. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613001288718.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Caregivers , Communication , Documentation , Family , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Preference , Prognosis , Religion , Socioeconomic Factors , Terminal Care
7.
Psychooncology ; 28(9): 1862-1870, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31257660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Psychological therapies combined with medication are effective treatments for depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. However, the psycho-oncology workforce is insufficient to meet patient need and is hard to access outside of the major cities. To bridge this gap, innovative models of care are required. Implementation of a new model of care requires attention to the facilitators and barriers. The aim of this study was to explore stakeholders' attitudes to the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based, shared care model for the treatment of depression and anxiety. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community-based clinical psychologists (n = 10), general practitioners (n = 6), and hospital-based psychologists working in psycho-oncology (n = 9). Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes. RESULTS: All stakeholders perceived the model as feasible and acceptable. Potential barriers/facilitators to implementation were summarised under six key themes: (a) initiative, ownership, and autonomy; (b) resources; (c) pathway establishment; (d) support; (e) skill acquisition; and (f) patient engagement. Facilitators included quality communication between health professionals across primary and tertiary care and appropriate education and support for community-based clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: This in-depth exploration of Australian health professionals' perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a community-based model of psycho-oncology care revealed that most clinicians were willing to adopt the proposed changes into practice. An RCT of a shared care intervention for depressed patients with cancer is needed.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Health Personnel/psychology , Psycho-Oncology/organization & administration , Adult , Australia , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Qualitative Research
8.
Psychooncology ; 28(5): 989-996, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30825239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is common, debilitating, and costly to the health system. While there has been a rising trajectory in FCR-related research, there remain many unanswered questions. A research agenda is required to clarify priorities and ensure that research dollars and effort are expended wisely. This study aimed to elicit research topics and priorities from clinical and academic experts in FCR. METHODS: Phase 1 consisted of elicitation by survey of prioritised FCR research topics from 20 members of the Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) FCR special interest group, followed by a focus group discussion with 28 clinicians, researchers, and cancer survivors, at which survey results were presented and further reflection was encouraged. This resulted in 28 research topics that were then subjected to a Delphi process to establish consensus (phase 2). RESULTS: Thirty-one participants completed round 1 of the Delphi process and 23 round 2, after which satisfactory consensus was reached. Five broad areas of research were identified as priorities. In rank order, they were (1) intervention models; (2) definition, predictors, and outcomes of FCR; (3) detection and screening; (4) training for health professionals; and (5) reaching specific populations. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the current findings will guide FCR researchers towards clinically relevant, significant research that will move the field forward. Experts nominated intervention research as the top priority, specifically exploring optimal formats of delivery including stepped care and blended models incorporating online or phone elements to increase accessibility.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/psychology , Fear/psychology , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Adult , Attitude to Health , Australia , Delphi Technique , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Psychology/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 120, 2019 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30764822

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Collaborative care involves active engagement of primary care and hospital physicians in shared care of patients beyond usual discharge summaries. This enhances community-based care and reduces dependence on specialists and hospitals. The model, successfully implemented in chronic care management, may have utility for treatment of depression in cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to identify components, delivery and roles and responsibilities within collaborative interventions for depression in the context of cancer. METHODS: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library and Central Register for Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify studies of randomised controlled trials comparing a treatment intervention that met the definition of collaborative model of depression care with usual care or other control condition. Studies of adult cancer patients with major depression or a non-bipolar depressive disorder published in English between 2005 and January 2018 were included. Cochrane checklist for risk of bias was completed (Study Prospero registration: CRD42018086515). RESULTS: Of 8 studies identified, none adhered to the definition of 'collaborative care'. Interventions delivered were multi-disciplinary, with care co-ordinated by nurses (n = 5) or social workers (n = 2) under the direction of psychiatrists (n = 7). Care was primarily delivered in cancer centres (n = 5). Care co-ordinators advised primary care physicians (GPs) of medication changes (n = 3) but few studies (n = 2) actively involved GPs in medication prescribing and management. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlighted joint participation of GPs and specialist care physicians in collaborative care depression management is promoted but not achieved in cancer care. Current models reflect hospital-based multi-disciplinary models of care. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO. The registration number is CRD42018086515.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Depression/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Participation , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Psychiatry/organization & administration , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Specialization/statistics & numerical data
10.
Br J Cancer ; 119(10): 1182-1190, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30369600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We modified and evaluated an advance care planning (ACP) intervention, which had been shown to improve compliance with patient's end of life (EoL) wishes, in a different patient population. METHODS: Patients with incurable cancer, and a Family Member (FM), were randomised one-to-one to usual care or usual care plus an ACP intervention, between April 2014 and January 2017. Oncologists and participants were non-blinded. ACP was based on the Respecting Patient Choices model, with an offer to provide individualised ranges for typical, best-case and worst-case scenarios for survival time. Seven facilitators (two oncology nurses, two nurses and three allied health professionals) delivered the intervention within 2 weeks of study enrolment. The primary outcome measure, assessed by interviewing the FM 3 months after patient death, was the FM perception that the patient's wishes were discussed, and met. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-five patients from seven Australian metropolitan oncology centres were referred for consideration by their oncologists, 444 (67%) met the study inclusion criteria and were approached by a study researcher. Two hundred and eight patients (47%) and their FM entered the trial as dyads. Fifty-three (46%) dyads in the ACP group and 63 (54%) dyads in the usual-care group had complete primary outcome data (p = 0.16). Seventy-nine patients and 53 FMs attended an ACP discussion. Mean length of discussion was 57 min. FMs from 23 (43%) dyads allocated to ACP and 21 (33%) dyads allocated usual care reported the patient's EoL wishes were discussed and met (difference 10%, 95% CI: -2 to 8, p = 0.27). There were no differences in EoL care received, patient satisfaction with care; FM satisfaction with care or with death; or FM well being. Rates of palliative care referral were high in both groups (97% vs 96%). CONCLUSIONS: A formal ACP intervention did not increase the likelihood that EoL care was consistent with patients' preferences.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Participation , Terminally Ill , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Caregivers/psychology , Family , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/nursing , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies
11.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 26(7): 1222-1229, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28162880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection is a difficult challenge in shoulder arthroplasty. This study investigated 1-stage modular component exchange vs. 1-stage complete removal and reimplantation (CRR) vs. 2-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: Between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012, 79 patients received a component exchange (n = 15), CRR (n = 45), or a 2-stage (n = 19) revision for infection. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors presenting the greatest risk of reinfection. Complications and functional outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 4 of 15 (27%) component exchanges, 2 of 45 (4%) CRRs, and 4 of 19 (21%) 2-stage procedures required a reoperation for infection with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. The difference between the CRR group and exchange group was significant (P = .030); however, the difference between the CRR group and 2-stage group did not reach statistical significance (P = .059). No preoperative and intraoperative selection bias between the groups was found. Binary logistic regression predicted that reinfection was highest in patients whose cultures grew Staphylococcus aureus (P = .004) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (P = .041) or those treated with a component exchange (P = .015). The difference between groups for noninfection-related complications was not significant (P = .703). All procedures provided improved functional outcomes and pain relief. CONCLUSION: Patients with infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species may require additional operations to treat the infection. Although effective in some cases, component exchange presents an increased risk for reinfection. A 1-stage CRR procedure had similar reinfection rates as a 2-stage procedure in our patient population.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Physical Therapy Modalities , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Hand Surg Am ; 40(6): 1106-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25840478

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of radiographs taken 2 weeks following plate fixation of distal radius fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients requiring operative fixation of distal radius fractures was performed with the objective of determining the utility of a 2-week postoperative radiograph in patient management. RESULTS: Three out of 268 (1%) patients had loss of fixation noted radiographically at the 2-week visit that resulted in a reoperation. There was no statistically significant difference in radial inclination, radial height, or volar tilt measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, or final follow-up. The average cost of a series of wrist radiographs was $85 with no additional radiology reading fees. CONCLUSIONS: Routine 2-week postoperative radiographs of operatively treated distal radius fractures rarely resulted in a change in patient management; however, they may have added unnecessary cost to the patient and health care system. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision analysis IV.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Radiography/economics , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Florida , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
13.
Hand (N Y) ; 10(1): 80-4, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25767424

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to compare the outcomes of patients with severe basilar thumb osteoarthritis treated with trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon versus a suture button device. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for patients undergoing trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty with APL tendon or suture button fixation. Outcome measures included disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH); visual analog score (VAS); grip strength; key pinch; tip pinch; and thumb opposition. Radiographic measurements, surgical times, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients in the APL tendon group and 27 patients in the suture button group had a minimum 6-month follow-up. VAS, DASH, and functional measurements improved after surgery for both groups. Mean operative time was 68 min for the APL tendon group and 48 min for the suture button group. Complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of suture button fixation when compared to APL tendon suspensionplasty offers similar clinical outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

14.
Oncologist ; 20(5): 523-31, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25802406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiethnic societies face challenges in delivering evidence-based culturally competent health care. This study compared health-related quality of life and psychological morbidity in a hospital-based sample of first-generation migrants and Australian-born Anglo cancer patients, controlling for potential confounders related to migrant status. Further, it explored the relative contribution of ethnicity versus migrant-related variables. METHODS: Eligible participants, recruited via 16 oncology clinics in Australia, included those over the age of 18, diagnosed with cancer (any type or stage) within the previous 12 months and having commenced treatment at least 1 month previously. RESULTS: In total, 571 migrant patients (comprising 145 Arabic, 248 Chinese, and 178 Greek) and a control group of 274 Anglo-Australian patients participated. In multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, socioeconomic status, time since diagnosis, and type of cancer, migrants had clinically significantly worse health-related quality of life (HRQL; 3.6-7.3 points on FACT-G, p < .0001), higher depression and anxiety (both p < .0001), and higher incidence of clinical depression (p < .0001) and anxiety (p = .003) than Anglo-Australians. Understanding the health system (p < .0001 for each outcome) and difficulty communicating with the doctor (p = .04 to .0001) partially mediated the impact of migrancy. In migrant-only analyses, migrant-related variables (language difficulty and poor understanding of the health system), not ethnicity, predicted outcomes. CONCLUSION: Migrants who develop cancer have worse psychological and HRQL outcomes than Anglo-Australians. Potential targets for intervention include assistance in navigating the health system, translated information, and cultural competency training for health professionals.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Australia , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Transients and Migrants/psychology
15.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 46(3): 265-70, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22391284

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether climate change has impacted on the nature of the obsessions or compulsions experienced by patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). METHODS: The sample comprised 50 patients with OCD checking subtype who had presented at the Anxiety Disorders Clinic at The University of Sydney seeking treatment during the period March 2008 to November 2009. Details of the type of obsessions and compulsions directly related to climate change phenomena were identified. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 50 participants (28%) were identified as having OCD concerns directly related to climate change. The most frequent concerns involved electricity, water and gas wastage. Less frequent concerns included pets dying of thirst and one participant was concerned about house damage due to floors cracking, pipes leaking; roof problems and white ant activity. Compulsions included checking and rechecking pet water bowls, light switches, taps, stoves, skirting boards, pipes, roofs and wooden structures. While these behaviours are not particularly unusual for people with this condition, it was the rationale they provided for carrying them out that was surprising. Instead of checking and rechecking so as to prevent fire or flood, the rituals were specifically performed so as to reduce their global footprint, or respond to climate change-induced negative events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the types of obsessions and compulsions experienced by 28% of our sample were directly aligned with the current issue of climate change and the perceived dangers associated with this phenomenon. To our knowledge this represents the first documentation of the significant impact of climate change on the nature of the concerns experienced by people with OCD checking subtype. We suggest that mental health professionals need to be aware of, and assess for the presence of such concerns.


Subject(s)
Climate Change , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Sex Characteristics , Stress, Psychological/psychology
16.
Case Rep Psychiatry ; 2012: 394603, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346442

ABSTRACT

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is one of the most frequently occurring psychiatric conditions in older adults. While exposure and response prevention (ERP) is considered the most effective psychological treatment for children and adults with OCD, research investigating its effectiveness for older adults is scarce. This clinical case study investigates the effectiveness of ERP in an 80-year-old man with a 65-year history of OCD. The client received 14 individual, 50-minute ERP treatment sessions. Clinician-based Y-BOCS scores reduced by 65% from 20 (moderate) at pretreatment to 7 (subclinical) at 7-month posttreatment followup. OCI-R total scores reduced by 45% from 38 at baseline to 21 at 7-month follow-up. Despite his long history of the disorder, ERP was effective and well tolerated. The application of ERP for older adults with OCD, including age-specific modifications that may be required for this treatment approach, is discussed.

17.
Cogn Behav Ther ; 39(4): 293-301, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21104477

ABSTRACT

Danger Ideation Reduction Therapy (DIRT) is a cognitive treatment package developed in the mid-1990s to treat obsessive-compulsive (OC) washing. DIRT is solely directed at decreasing threat expectancies and does not involve direct or indirect exposure. The effectiveness of the DIRT package for OC washers has been examined, and to date a number of publications, including two randomised controlled trials, support its efficacy. Recently, the DIRT package was modified to treat people with the OC checking subtype. In the current study, three adult OC checkers received DIRT in 12 to 14 individual 1-hr sessions conducted by a clinical psychologist. At posttreatment, substantial and clinically significant reductions in scores on a range of standardized outcome measures of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptom severity were apparent for all three participants. Crucially, these improvements were maintained at 4-month follow-up. Although further research is clearly warranted, these preliminary findings suggest that DIRT for checkers may prove as effective as DIRT for OC washers.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Fear/psychology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
18.
Behav Res Ther ; 47(5): 437-43, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19249747

ABSTRACT

Attentional biases have been proposed as maintaining and causal factors in anxiety, and it has been suggested that training attentional bias can impact on emotional responding. Given the severity of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and the considerable number of clients who do not respond to traditional therapies, understanding the factors that maintain anxiety in OCD is critical for the development of effective treatments. This study investigated attentional biases in a homogenous group of OCD patients whose primary concern was checking (OCD-Check; n=18) compared to a Control group individually matched for age, gender and level of education (Control; n=18) using a dot probe task. No evidence of attentional bias, or of differences in orienting to or disengaging from checking-relevant stimuli, was found in the OCD group compared to the matched Control group. From this data, it would appear that attentional bias may not be a feature of obsessive compulsive checking. The limitations of the present study and future research directions are discussed.


Subject(s)
Attention , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Avoidance Learning , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reaction Time , Verbal Behavior , Young Adult
19.
ANZ J Surg ; 72(4): 258-64, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11982511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with common bile duct stones associated with stones in the gall bladder remains controversial. METHODS: Over the three-year period from 1996 to 1999, patients with cholelithiasis and known choledocholithiasis, or choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were initially treated by placing a stent across the sphincter of Oddi. The stent was pushed along a guide wire through the cystic duct and then down the common bile duct, before the cystic duct was closed. Subsequently, the stent was used to facilitate performance of a needle knife endoscopic sphincterotomy. The stent was then removed, a cholangiography was performed and the common bile duct was cleared. Patients with persistent jaundice usually had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. RESULTS: Transcystic stenting was the 'intention-to-treat' basis of therapy for 56 of the patients. The placement of the stent only failed once when the stent became trapped in the cystic duct. Complications of the operation included: pain and jaundice (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 1), and pulmonary embolus (n = 1). The median postoperative hospitalization was 2 days (range: 1-15). Five further patients had common bile duct stones removed via a choledochotomy; a stent was placed through the choledochotomy before its closure. The selective common bile duct cannulation rate at the first endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography, was 98%. A second endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was required in 15% of patients. The only complication of all the endoscopic procedures was a single case of mild cholangitis; there were no cases of pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: A treatment option open to all surgeons for non-jaundiced patients with known choledocholithiasis or choledocholithiasis found at operative cholangiogram, is the transcystic stenting of the sphincter of Oddi at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At a subsequent sitting, the common bile duct can be safely cleared endoscopically using a sphincterotomy facilitated by the stent.


Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Gallstones/surgery , Stents , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholangiography , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholelithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Cholelithiasis/surgery , Female , Gallstones/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...