Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 300 patients: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to assess short and mid-term results of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for 4 different indications. METHODS: From 1996 to 2010, 300 patients (80 female, 220 male, median age 67 years [20 to 88]) underwent TEVAR at our department. Among them were 137 descending thoracic aneurysms (DTA), 80 type B dissections (60 acute, 20 chronic), 59 perforating aortic ulcer (PAU), and 24 traumatic aortic transections (ATAT). Hospital mortality and mid-term survival among different indications for TEVAR were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality in our series was 5% (n = 15). Seven patients with DTA (5%), 4 patients with type B dissections (5%), 2 patients with PAU (3.4%), and 2 ATAT (8%) patients died during their hospital stay. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in survival rates according to the various indications for TEVAR (p < 0.001). Overall long-term mortality was 86%, 63%, and 44% at 1, 5, and 10 years. Early and late endoleak rate was 18% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TEVAR has evolved into a safe and effective therapy for different aortic pathology resulting in promising long-term results. Nevertheless, the indication for TEVAR has direct impact on the success of the procedure. Patients with acute type B aortic dissections and acute traumatic aortic lesions seem to benefit the most from TEVAR.

Effect of cerebral protection strategy on outcome of patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and mid- to long-term results of different cerebral protection techniques in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between April 1987 and January 2011, 329 patients (220 male patients; median age, 60 years; range, 16-87) with type A aortic dissection underwent replacement of the ascending aorta or aortic arch with an open distal anastomosis. Either hypothermic circulatory arrest alone at 18 °C (n = 116; 35%) or combined with retrograde cerebral perfusion (n = 122; 37%) or antegrade cerebral perfusion at 25 °C (n = 91; 28%) was used. RESULTS: The median circulatory arrest time was 30 minutes (range, 12-92). The overall 30-day mortality was 19% (62 of 329). The 30-day mortality stratified by group was 26% (30 patients) in the hypothermic circulatory arrest group, 16% in the retrograde cerebral perfusion group (20 patients), and 13% (12 patients) in the antegrade cerebral perfusion group (P = .047). Permanent neurologic dysfunction occurred in 53 patients (16%), with statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (23% for hypothermic circulatory arrest, 12% for retrograde cerebral perfusion, and 12% for antegrade cerebral perfusion; P = .033). Univariate analysis showed a significant effect of the brain protection strategy on 30-day mortality and neurologic outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hemodynamic instability, preoperative resuscitation, age, and operative year as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Regarding permanent neurologic dysfunction, the multivariate analysis could not identify any independent predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed statistically significant differences among the 3 groups with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate of 84%, 79%, and 77% with antegrade cerebral perfusion, 75%, 72%, and 66% with retrograde cerebral perfusion, and 66%, 62%, and 60% with hypothermic circulatory arrest alone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the antegrade cerebral perfusion group had the best short- and long-term survival rates. However, during the study period, several significant improvements in the treatment of patients with type A aortic dissection were achieved; therefore, independent predictors of mortality and permanent neurologic dysfunction were difficult to identify.