Offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia with different stimulus ranges.

INTRODUCTION: Offset analgesia (OA), a large reduction in pain after a brief increase in intensity of an otherwise stable painful stimulus, has been established by a large body of research. But the opposite effect, onset hyperalgesia (OH), a disproportional hyperalgesic response after a briefly decreased intensity of a painful stimulus, has only been investigated in one previous study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to induce OA and OH in healthy participants and explore the effects of different stimulus ranges (increase/decrease of temperature) on OA and OH. METHODS: A total of 62 participants were tested in 2 identical experiments. Offset analgesia and OH conditions included 2 different temperature deviations (±1°C/±2°C) from initial temperature and were compared with a constant temperature (control). RESULTS: Offset analgesia was successfully elicited in OA1°C in experiment 1, and in OA1°C and OA2°C in experiment 2. Results indicate a continuous stimulus-response relationship between the stimulus range and the resulting hypoalgesic response. Onset hyperalgesia was only elicited in OH2°C in experiment 1. Exploratory analysis showed that the lack of OH response in experiment 2 could be explained by sex differences, and that OA and OH responses were only weakly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: The asymmetry between pain responses after a brief temperature increase and decrease suggests that different mechanisms are involved in the pain responses to increasing and decreasing temperature. This asymmetry may also be explained by high temperatures in OA condition (+1°C/+2°C above baseline) that could be seen as salient "learning signals," which augment the response to following changes in temperature.

Predicting pain: differential pain thresholds during self-induced, externally induced, and imagined self-induced pressure pain.

ABSTRACT: During self-induced pain, a copy of the motor information from the body's own movement may help predict the painful sensation and cause downregulation of pain. This phenomenon, called sensory attenuation, enables the distinction between self-produced stimuli vs stimuli produced by others. Sensory attenuation has been shown to occur also during imagined self-produced movements, but this has not been investigated for painful sensations. In the current study, the pressure pain thresholds of 40 healthy participants aged 18 to 35 years were assessed when pain was induced by the experimenter (other), by themselves (self), or by the experimenter while imagining the pressure to be self-induced (imagery). The pressure pain was induced on the participants left lower thigh (quadriceps femoris) using a handheld algometer. Significant differences were found between all conditions: other and self (P < 0.001), other and imagery (P < 0.001), and self and imagery (P = 0.004). The mean pressure pain threshold for other was 521.49 kPa (SE = 38.48), for self 729.57 kPa (SE = 32.32), and for imagery 618.88 kPa (SE = 26.67). Thus, sensory attenuation did occur both in the self condition and the imagery condition. The results of this study may have clinical relevance for understanding the mechanisms involved in the elevated pain thresholds seen in patients with self-injury behavior and the low pain thresholds seen in patients with chronic pain conditions. Imagery of sensory attenuation might also be used to alleviate the pain experience for patients undergoing procedural pain.