A comparative study evaluating C-reactive protein, sputum eosinophils and forced expiratory volume in one second in obese and nonobese asthmatics.

ntroduction: Asthma and obesity are considered inflammatory disorders. Inflammatory markers - sputum eosinophils, C-reactive protein (CRP) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were analysed to find their association in obese asthmatics and compared with their asthma control test (ACT) to understand these parameters in this phenotype. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After completing the asthma control test (ACT), the CRP, FEV1 and sputum eosinophils of sixty asthmatics were compared to find the association of them in obese and nonobese asthmatics and contrasted with their ACT. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS V20.0, Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric test), Pearson's correlation coefficient and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We found significant differences for CRP (P = 0.001) and sputum eosinophils (P = 0.001) between obese and nonobese asthmatics, both higher in obese asthmatics and with a significant association with body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05). The FEV1 levels were independent of the BMI levels of asthmatics. There was a significant correlation between the CRP and sputum eosin-ophils (0.52, P = 0.001) for all asthmatics. There was no significant correlation between FEV1 and sputum eosinophils (nonobese P = 0.120, obese P = 0.388) and between FEV1 and CRP (obese P = 0.423, nonobese P = 0.358) in both obese and nonobese asthmatics. Obesity had an association (P = 0.001) with ACT scores (≤ 19). CONCLUSIONS: Sputum eosinophils and CRP were raised in obese asthmatics and had a positive association with BMI. Obese asthmatics had a poorer subjective asthma control than nonobese asthmatics despite FEV1 being independent of the BMI levels. Measuring the systemic inflammatory markers could help in additional interventions in reducing systemic inflammation and thus possibly facilitating better symptom control.

Increased Likelihood of Bacterial Pathogens in the Coronal Sulcus and Urethra of Uncircumcised Men in a Diverse Group of HIV Infected and Uninfected Patients in India.

BACKGROUND: The biological mechanism of circumcision as potentiating HIV prevention is poorly understood. Foreskin microbiota has been postulated as having a potential role; however, little is known about the relationship between bacterial pathogens and circumcision in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We sampled the coronal sulcus of a diverse group of circumcised and uncircumcised men (n=315) from a government chest hospital and fertility clinic in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. Genital examination was conducted on three groups of men: Group 1 - HIV infected; Group 2 - TB infected; Group 3 - control. Aerobic and anaerobic specimens were cultured according to standard clinical protocols, and results were analyzed following multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen study participants - 47.6% of Group 1, 36.5% of Group 2, and 15.9% of Group 3 - were enrolled in the study and included in all analyses. Overall 37.1% of the participants were circumcised without variation across groups (P=0.29). Smegma was observed in 18.7% of the participants with no cases observed in Group 3 (P<0.001). Gram-negative pathogens were more prevalent among study participants in Group 1 (22.7%) and Group 2 (30.4%) as compared with those in Group 3 (6.0%) (P=0.003). In multivariate regression analysis, controlling for group, age, and presence of smegma, uncircumcised men were more likely to be colonized with gram positives [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.9; P<0.05)], gram negatives (AOR 2.4; P<0.05), or any pathogen (AOR 2.8; P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Uncircumcised men in this population in South India are more likely to harbor bacterial pathogens in the coronal sulcus than do their circumcised counterparts. Future studies should examine the relationship between foreskin microbiota and HIV transmission.