Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 51(1): 87-93, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608497

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify, appraise and summarize the available data concerning the impact of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection on reproductive outcome following in-vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Lilacs and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2017. Any type of HPV infection assessed through polymerase chain reaction, subfertility factors and IVF indications and protocols were considered. Our primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage, while secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory parameters. We planned subgroup analyses according to the status of cervical cytology and presence of infection in the male partner. We assessed the relative risk (RR), using a random-effects model; heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Quality of the evidence was evaluated using the recommendations of the GRADE Working Group. RESULTS: From the 14 studies eligible for inclusion, quantitative data from 10, evaluating 299 women with HPV infection and 2049 women without HPV infection, were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed no significant difference between HPV-infected and non-infected women in rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.53); I2 = 0%; six studies, 983 women), clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.74-1.54); I2 = 61%; eight studies, 1173 women) or miscarriage (RR, 1.58 (95% CI, 0.93-2.69); I2 = 8%; six studies, 290 clinical pregnancies). The overall quality of the evidence was very low, downgraded two levels because of serious limitations of the included studies (observational studies) and imprecision. In contrast, pooled results in the subgroup analysis based on the presence of infection in the male partner showed significant differences in rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.23-0.82); I2 = 0%; three studies, 429 participants; P = 0.01) and miscarriage (RR, 3.70 (95% CI, 1.94-7.05); I2 = 0%; two studies, 90 participants; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence is still inadequate to enable us to draw firm conclusions regarding the effect of HPV infection in women on the most important reproductive outcomes following IVF; however, it suggests that the effect is not large for rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy. When infection is present in the male partner, it seems that there is a negative effect on live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate and an increase in miscarriage rate, a finding that should be interpreted with caution, owing to the very low quality of evidence supporting it. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Fertilization in Vitro , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Pregnancy Rate , Abortion, Spontaneous/virology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
2.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 35(6): 635-40, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25556267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: The aim of the present study was to record how the treatment of female cancer may affect sexuality and interpersonal relations in the couple. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 2008 until February 2012, the authors prospectively studied 67 patients with breast cancer (Group A) and 43 with gynecological cancers (Group B). As control groups 33 patients with benign breast and 30 patients with benign gynecological lesions (group 0a and 0b respectively) were used. Sexuality and interpersonal relations were evaluated by a questionnaire. The authors also evaluated interpersonal relations focusing on sexual function at the time of diagnosis and a year after the initial treatment for cancer. RESULTS: A significant reduction of the "sexual desire", "sexual Arousal", and "orgasm" dimension was found in both cancer groups, in contrast to the control group, revealing no significant change. The "sexual enjoyment" scale was significantly decreased in gynecological cancer group but not in breast cancer group. While the score on the "relationship quality" dimension significantly increased in both cancer groups. In all groups, there was a significantly positive correlation between sexual function and enjoyment; on the contrary, there was a significantly negative correlation between relationship quality and sexual function and enjoyment. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunctions is a clinical problem which should be evidenced at the beginning of therapy, from the oncologists in order to provide integrated treatment to their patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/psychology , Sexuality , Adult , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...