Characterization of urethral diverticula in males.

INTRODUCTION: Urethral diverticulum in a male is a rare entity and the literature is limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of our study is to characterize this disease in patients from three Mayo Clinic locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart analysis was performed of patients across all three Mayo Clinic sites that had International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to urethral diverticulum or urethral diverticulectomy via CPT code. Data were available for patients that were seen from 6/1/2003 through 10/5/2018. Patients were classified by age, etiology, presenting symptomatology, location, treatment, pathology, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 87 men met the initial search criteria with 52 having documented urethral diverticula. The most common presenting complaint in these men was incontinence (37%). The majority of diverticula (83%) were within the anterior urethra. The most common diagnostic modalities were retrograde urethrogram (46%) and cystoscopy (50%). Most diverticula were iatrogenic (77%). Of the men that were diagnosed, 42% went on to have diverticulectomy. Median follow up was 1.5 years. Eighteen percent of patients had persistent urinary symptoms following diverticulectomy with incontinence being the most common finding. Postoperative complications were experienced by 26% patients with the most prevalent complication being urethrocutaneous fistula. The patients who did not undergo diverticulectomy either had other surgical procedure to manage their coexisting conditions or were managed medically. CONCLUSION: Urethral diverticulum in males is a rare yet important entity that requires special consideration, especially in those who have had prior surgery within the lower urinary tract.

Characterization of Urethral Diverticula in Women.

OBJECTIVE: Urethral diverticulum is a rare, yet important condition for the female pelvic surgeon. We aimed to characterize the women who have been seen for this condition across the three Mayo Clinic locations. METHODS: Medical record review was performed for patients across all three Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, Arizona, Florida) that had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, (ICD-9) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, (ICD-10) codes corresponding to urethral diverticulum (ICD-9, 599.2; ICD-10, N36.1). We also performed a review of patients who underwent urethral diverticulectomy via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 53235. Data were available for patients from June 1, 2003, to October 5, 2018. Patients were classified by age, etiology, presenting symptomatology, location, treatment, pathology, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-seven women met initial coding criteria for urethral diverticula, with 228 women having documented urethral diverticula. The most common presentations were irritative voiding symptoms (93) and infections (92). The most common diagnostic modality was radiographic imaging (198/228) with magnetic resonance imaging accounting for 157 cases. Etiology was unknown in the majority of cases (181/228). Of women who were diagnosed, 172 underwent diverticulectomy with 51 concurrent urethral sling placements. Final pathology demonstrated 2 cases of malignancy. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 0 months to 15 years (mean, 1.4 years; median, 4 months). Forty-three patients had persistent urinary symptoms after diverticulectomy with stress incontinence being the most common. Eight patients underwent subsequent sling placement. Fourteen patients had recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This appears to be the largest reported series on female urethral diverticula, a rare yet important entity that requires special consideration. Most surgical cases found resolution of symptoms after diverticulectomy. Importantly, less than 2% of urethral diverticula were associated with malignancy.