Quality of life measures in older adults after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: On average older adults experiencing TBI are hospitalized four times as often, have longer hospital stays, and experience slower recovery trajectories and worse functional outcomes compared to younger populations with the same injury severity. A standard measure of Qol for older adults with TBI would facilitate accurate and reliable data across the individual patient care continuum and across clinical care settings, as well as support more rigorous research studies of metadata. PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate patient reported Qol measures in studies with older adults post TBI. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out focusing on the various tools to measure Qol in older adults, ≥ 65 years of age with a diagnosis of TBI. Data bases searched included Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychInfo from date of inception to September 25, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. Nine different tools were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Findings based on the comparison of reliability and construct validity of the Qol measures reported in this review suggest that no single instrument is superior to all others for our study population. Future research in this field should include the enrollment of larger study samples of older adults. Without these future efforts, the ability to detect an optimal Qol measure will be hindered.

Common Data Elements for Concussion in Tertiary Care: Phase One in Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Standardized data collection for traumatic brain injury (TBI) (including concussion) using common data elements (CDEs) has strengthened clinical care and research capacity in the United States and Europe. Currently, Ontario healthcare providers do not collect uniform data on adult patients diagnosed with concussion. OBJECTIVE: The Ontario Concussion Care Strategy (OCCS) is a collaborative network of multidisciplinary healthcare providers, brain injury advocacy groups, patient representatives, and researchers with a shared vision to improve concussion care across the province, starting with the collection of standardized data. METHODS: The International Framework of Functioning Disability and Health was selected as the conceptual framework to inform the selection of CDEs. The CDEs recommended by the OCCS were identified using key literature, including the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Zurich Consensus Statements for concussion in sport and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation Concussion/mTBI clinical guidelines. RESULTS: The OCCS has recommended and piloted CDEs for Ontario that are readily available at no cost, clinically relevant, patient friendly, easy to interpret, and recognized by the international scientific community. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of CDEs can help to shift Ontario toward internationally recognized standard data collection, and in so doing yield a more comprehensive evidence-based approach to care while also supporting rigorous research.

Identification of hidden health utilization services and costs in adults awaiting tertiary care following mild traumatic brain injury in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

AIM: The cognitive, emotional, behavioral and physical impairments experienced by adults after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can produce substantial disability, with 15-20% requiring referral to tertiary care (TC) for persistent symptoms. METHODS: A convenience sample of 201 adult patients referred to TC as a result of mTBI was studied. Self-reported data were collected at first TC visit, on average 10 months postinjury. Patients reported the type and intensity of healthcare provider visit(s) undertaken while awaiting TC. RESULTS: On average males reported 37 and females 30 healthcare provider visits, resulting in over $500,000 Canadian dollars spent on potentially excess mTBI care over 1 year. DISCUSSION: Based on conservative estimate of 15% of mTBI patients receiving TC, this finding identifies a possible excess in care of $110 million for Ontario. Accurate diagnosis of mTBI and early coordination of follow-up care for those needing TC could increase cost-effectiveness.

Driving problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess driving problems experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine the relationship between functional status and driving difficulty. METHODS: Using the South Eastern Ontario Medical Organization (SEAMO) database, we identified 721 patients with RA from both urban and rural backgrounds. They completed a cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey that included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and a co-morbidity questionnaire. We assessed the proportion of drivers versus non-drivers and patients who reported difficulty driving and who used vehicle adaptations. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 74% and 92.2% of the subjects were current drivers. Fifty percent of the current drivers reported a little difficulty, 6.8% reported quite a bit of difficulty, and 1.5% a great deal of difficulty driving. Major reasons given for why RA limited their driving were stiffness and pain. Frequent use of mobility aids (adjusted odds ratio, OR: 5.85), HAQ-DI > or = 1 (adjusted OR: 3.40), and older age (adjusted OR: 1.04) were significant predictors of an individual with RA discontinuing driving. Higher levels of disability (HAQ-DI) were associated with a greater number of problems reported with driving and with curtailment of driving. A multivariate logistic regression determined that having a HAQ-DI > or = 1 (adjusted OR: 4.3) and difficulties sitting in the vehicle (adjusted OR: 2.9) were associated with RA limiting driving. CONCLUSION: Over 50% of respondents reported some degree of difficulty driving due to their RA. Scores on HAQ-DI > or = 1 were associated with difficulty driving. Further validation of our findings needs to be performed.