Anesthetics' role in postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse surgery with concomitant midurethral slings: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Spinal anesthesia can be a potential risk factor for postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Our objective was to compare POUR rates for outpatient vaginal pelvic floor surgeries when using spinal versus general anesthesia. Our hypothesis was that spinal anesthesia would have higher POUR rates compared with general anesthesia. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial on subjects undergoing outpatient pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with a concomitant midurethral sling (MUS). Subjects were discharged home the same day as surgery. Subjects were excluded if they had a preoperative post-void residual > 150 ml, they were < 40 years of age, surgery was < 1 h, or they had contraindications to spinal or general anesthesia. A standardized voiding trial was performed. The primary aim was to compare POUR rates between anesthesia groups. A power analysis estimated 28 subjects were required per group to detect a 37% difference with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 15, 2015. Sixty-one subjects were enrolled between June 22, 2015, and December 31, 2017. Three were excluded, leaving 29 in each group. Groups were similar in demographics. For the primary outcome, there was a 14.3% difference in POUR rates between spinal and general anesthesia, which did not reach statistical significance based on our power calculation (p = 0.2516). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, there is not an increased rate of POUR with the use of spinal anesthesia for POP surgery with MUS. However, since there was a trend toward higher rates of POUR in the spinal group, it is possible that a larger powered study design would be able to detect a statistically significant difference between the groups. Based on these findings, if surgical patients would benefit from spinal anesthesia, the risk of urinary retention should not be considered a reason to not utilize this form of anesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Does spinal anesthesia for prolapse surgery with concomitant sling lead to an increase in urinary retention compared to general anesthesia? https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02547155?term=laura+martin&rank=3 (NCT02547155).

Testicular Metastasis From Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Recurrent Epididymo-orchitis.

OBJECTIVE: To present a rare case of testicular metastasis from prostatic adenocarcinoma origin and to provide a meaningful discussion of currently available supporting literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pertinent health information was obtained by retrospective analysis of hospital electronic medical records. RESULTS: A 93-year-old man with history of castration-resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma presented with recurrent episodes of epididymo-orchitis with initial symptoms responsive to oral antibiotics. Further investigation with testicular ultrasound revealed two 1-cm cystic lesions in the right testicle, one complex in nature, with bilateral mild-to-moderate hydroceles. Repeat ultrasound confirmed growth of lesions to 1.4 and 1.6 cm, respectively. Patient underwent bilateral orchiectomy with resultant symptomatic resolution. Surgical pathology returned with an isolated right testicular parenchyma infiltrated by adenocarcinoma from a primary prostatic neoplasm. Follow-up at 2 and 8 weeks postoperatively revealed prostate-specific antigen levels of 2.60 ng/mL and 4.14 ng/mL, and with no further complaints of pain. CONCLUSION: The most commonly documented sites for metastasis from a prostatic carcinoma origin are to regional lymph nodes and bone, followed by the lungs, liver, and adrenal glands. However, patients with a history of prostate cancer presenting with recurrent symptoms of epididymo-orchitis should have a high suspicion for testicular metastasis. Treatment with bilateral orchiectomy offers patients the possibility for both favorable symptomatic and oncologic outcomes.

Intraoperative Cystoscopic Evaluation of Ureteral Patency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare different modalities to aid in the evaluation of intraoperative ureteral patency on cystoscopy in the postindigo carmine era. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, participants undergoing pelvic surgery were randomized into one of four groups: saline distention (control), 10% dextrose distention, oral phenazopyridine, or intravenous sodium fluorescein. Our primary outcome was visibility of the ureteral jets. Secondary outcomes included surgeon satisfaction; adverse reactions including allergies, urinary tract infections, urinary retention, cystoscopy times, and ureteral obstruction; and delayed diagnosis. Participants were followed for 6 weeks. A sample size of 176 participants was planned to demonstrate a 30% difference in the visibility scale. All analyses were performed in an intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: From February 25, 2015, through August 2015, 176 participants were enrolled; 174 completed the trial, and two did not undergo intervention. Forty-four participants were included in the phenazopyridine, dextrose, saline, and sodium fluorescein groups. Sodium fluorescein and 10% dextrose resulted in significantly improved visibility and satisfaction when compared with the control group (P<.001 and P=.004, respectively). Dextrose provided the highest satisfaction and phenazopyridine provided lowest, but visibility was not statistically different between the two groups (P=.101). Three ureteral obstructions were identified intraoperatively and none in the postoperative period. Mean total cystoscopy time varied between 4.0 and 4.8 minutes and postoperative urinary retention rate was 50% across all groups. Overall urinary tract infection rate was 24.1%, which was similar between interventions. There were no related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared with the control, 10% dextrose and sodium fluorescein resulted in improved visibility and provided significantly more satisfaction in the evaluation for ureteral patency with no considerable increase in operative time or morbidity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02476448.

Laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomies with simultaneous kidney transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Extirpation of polycystic kidneys for various medical reasons has been performed using many different approaches in attempts to limit morbidity from such a large operation. In indicated patients, it has usually been offered in a staged approach with renal transplantation to avoid graft complications. We published the first case of simultaneous laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy with kidney transplant in 2008. The present study shows our continued experience with offering this minimally invasive, single surgery alternative. The results are comparable to a staged laparoscopic approach with significantly shorter total hospital stay and one recovery for the patient and his/her family. OBJECTIVE: • To analyse the perioperative outcomes of native bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy (BLN) with simultaneous kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • From November 2000 to April 2011, 37 patients were seen for renal failure secondary to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and underwent renal transplant with native nephrectomies at a single tertiary academic centre. • In all, 15 patients underwent BLN for ADPKD followed by simultaneous kidney transplantation. • The other 22 patients underwent BLN for ADPKD with kidney transplant performed at a separate setting. • Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, complications regardless of need for intervention, and graft function were analysed in both groups. RESULTS: • The combined surgery was completed without intraoperative complication in all cases. • The median total operative duration was 372 min, estimated blood loss was 300 mL with two patients requiring transfusion, and the median (range) hospital stay was 5 (3-7) days. • All patients had immediate graft function with additional relief of compressive symptoms. • In comparison to our staged cohort, the simultaneous group had a significantly shorter total hospital stay. • All other outcomes and complication rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: • In ADPKD, a less invasive laparoscopic approach for native nephrectomies with simultaneous renal transplant offers comparable morbidity without graft compromise and the convenience of one operation and one recovery for the patient.