ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study reports on the risk of radiation-induced myelitis (RM) of the spinal cord from a large single-institutional experience with 1 to 5 fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the spine. Methods and Materials: A retrospective review of patients who received spine SBRT to a radiation naïve level at or above the conus medullaris between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Local failure determination was based on SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RM was defined as neurologic symptoms consistent with the segment of cord irradiated in the absence of neoplastic disease recurrence and graded by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Rates of adverse events were estimated and dose-volume statistics from delivered treatment plans were extracted for the planning target volumes and spinal cord. Results: A total of 353 lesions in 277 patients were identified that met the specified criteria, for which 270, 70, and 13 lesions received 1-, 3-, and 5-fraction treatments, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-52 months) for all surviving patients. The median overall survival was 33.0 months (95% CI, 29-43). The median D0.03cc to the spinal cord was 11.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5-12.4), 16.7 Gy (IQR, 12.8-20.6), and 26.0 Gy (IQR, 24.1-28.1), for 1-, 3-, 5-fractions. Using an a/b = 2Gy for the spinal cord, the median single-fraction equivalent-dose (SFED2) was 11.7 Gy (IQR, 10.2-12.5 Gy) and the normalized biological equivalent dose (nBED2/2) was 19.9 Gy (IQR, 15.4-22.8 Gy). One patient experienced grade 2 RM after a single-fraction treatment. The cumulative probability of RM was 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-2%). Conclusions: Spine SBRT is safe while limiting the spinal cord (as defined on treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelogram) D0.03cc to less than 14 Gy, 21.9 Gy, and 30 Gy, for 1, 3, and 5-fractions, consistent with standard guidelines.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to develop and evaluate an automated digitization algorithm for high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy, with the goal of reducing the duration of treatment planning, staff resources, variability, and potential for human error. METHODS: An automated digitization algorithm was developed and retrospectively evaluated using treatment planning data from 10 patients with cervix cancer who were treated with a titanium tandem and ovoids applicator set. Applicators were segmented, without human interaction, by thresholding CT images to isolate high-density voxels and assigning the voxels to applicator and nonapplicator structures using HDBSCAN, a density-based linkage clustering algorithm. The applicator contours were determined from the centroid of the clustered voxels on each image slice and written to a treatment plan file. Automated contours were evaluated against manual digitization using distance and dosimetric metrics. RESULTS: A close agreement between automatic and manual digitization was observed. The mean magnitude of contour disagreement for 10 patients equaled 0.3 mm. Hausdorff distances were ≤1.0 mm. The applicator tip coordinates had submillimeter agreement. The median and mean dose volume histogram parameter differences were less than or equal to 1% for high-risk clinical target volume D90, high-risk clinical target volume D95, bladder D2cc, rectum D2cc, large bowel D2cc, and small bowel D2cc. The average execution time for the automated algorithm was less than 30 s. CONCLUSION: The digitization of titanium tandem and ovoids applicators for high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning can be automated using straightforward thresholding and clustering algorithms. The adoption of automated digitization is expected to improve the consistency of treatment plans and reduce the duration of treatment planning.
