Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(5-6): 347-51, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15981008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalised medical patients are at significant risk of venous thromboembolic disease through fatal pulmonary embolism; low-molecular-weight heparins have been proved efficient in preventing deep venous thrombosis in surgical and medical patients, but their effect on mortality in bedridden medical patients remains unknown. METHODS: In a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 2,474 consecutive patients aged over 40 years admitted to internal medicine departments in the last 24 h and unable to move alone were randomised to receive 0.3 ml nadroparin (7,500 anti-Xa units) or placebo for up to 21 days. The primary end-point was overall mortality at day 21. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the patients' characteristics. Overall mortality between the two groups was not statistically different [10.08% (124 of 1,230) versus 10.29% (128 of 1,244), respectively, in the nadroparin and in the placebo groups; relative risk reduction 0.02, CI (-0.27, +0.25), P=0.89]. An autopsy was performed in 123 of the 252 patients who died (49%). Pulmonary embolism was discovered at autopsy in 10 of 63 patients in the nadroparin group and in 17 of 60 in the placebo group [relative risk reduction 0.38, CI (-0.27, +0.70), P=0.13]. CONCLUSION: Nadroparin does not have a significant effect on mortality in bedridden medical patients, based on the study results. The study provides no data suggesting that low-molecular-weight heparins might reduce the incidence of thromboembolic in-patients hospitalised for an acute medical disease.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Nadroparin/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Autopsy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Nadroparin/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Survival Analysis , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/mortality , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/mortality
2.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 43(3): 160-6, 1994 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8024227

ABSTRACT

This multicentre, randomised, open trial compared the efficacy and safety/acceptability of calcium nadroparin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, naproxen, in the treatment of superficial venous thrombosis of the lower limbs, in 117 patients. Calcium nadroparin was given at two dosage regimens: a fixed dose (daily subcutaneous injection of 0.6 ml, i.e. 6150 anti-Xa IU, n = 38) or a dose adjusted for body weight (31.5 anti-Xa IU/kg, n = 40). The naproxen was given orally (500 mg as a single daily dose, n = 39). Treatment duration was 6 days in both groups. A very marked difference was found to the advantage of calcium nadroparin, although this difference did not reach the threshold of statistical significance with regard to repermeabilisation of the thrombosed superficial vein at the end of treatment. The most striking result concerned the regression of symptoms and signs. At the end of treatment (D7), there was a significant difference to the advantage of the calcium nadroparin groups, particularly regarding feelings of heat and redness (p < 0.001 in both cases). The persistence of symptoms and signs at 8 weeks was statistically less frequent (p = 0.007) in the calcium nadroparin groups than in the naproxen group. Efficacy did not differ between the calcium nadroparin fixed dose and calcium nadroparin weight-adjusted dose groups. No adverse events nor clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were encountered. Antithrombotic treatment of superficial venous thromboses with calcium nadroparin is well tolerated and appears to be associated with a greater improvement in symptoms and signs, in the short and mid-terms, than that obtained with an oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory.


Subject(s)
Nadroparin/therapeutic use , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Thrombophlebitis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nadroparin/administration & dosage , Nadroparin/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Thrombophlebitis/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL