Integrated feathering for craniospinal irradiation improves patient safety and departmental efficiency.

This paper presents to the dosimetrist audience an integrated feathering technique for craniospinal irradiation which improves dosimetry, physics, physician and therapist efficiencies while increasing patient safety and decreasing portal imaging time. This technique has been presented by other authors in physics journals stressing technical and quality assurance aspects, this article is presented to the treatment planners with a focus on the planning process including field design and weighting, efficiency improvements and patient safety.

Efficacy of scalp-sparing volumetric-modulated arc therapy approach in reducing scalp radiation dose for patients with glioblastoma: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Radiation is integral to the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). However, radiation-induced scalp toxicity can negatively impact patients' quality of life. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) optimizes the dose to organs at risk (OARs). We hypothesize that a scalp-sparing VMAT (SSV) approach can significantly reduce undesirable doses to the scalp without compromising the target dose. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of GBM patients who originally received radiation with non-SSV. We contoured the scalp as a 5 mm rind-like structure beneath the skin above the level of the foramen magnum. We replanned our patients using SSV techniques. We compared dosimetric data for the scalp, planning target volume (PTV), and select critical normal structures between non-SSV and SSV plans. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed GBMs were included in our study. All patients received 60 Gy in 30 fractions. 9 patients received it in a single course. The rest received 46 Gy in 23 fractions to an initial volume followed by 14 Gy in 7 fractions to a cone-down volume (split course). New VMAT plans were generated after adding the scalp as an OAR. The median scalp volume was 416 cm3 (363-468 cm3). The median reductions in scalp Dmin, Dmax, and Dmean were 43.5% (-100% to 0%), 2.8% (+13.4% to -24.9%), and 15.7% (+2.1% to -39.9%) respectively. Median reductions in scalp D20cc and D30 cc were 19.5% (-2.7% to -54.5%), and 19.0% (-5.3% to -39.5%) respectively. The median volumes of the scalp receiving 30 Gy, 40 Gy, and 50 Gy were reduced by 42.3% (-70.6% to -12.5%), 72% (-100% to -2.3%), and 92.4% (-100% to +5.4%) respectively. There were no significant differences in the doses delivered to the PTV, brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm between SSV and non-SSV plans. CONCLUSIONS: SSV can significantly reduce scalp radiation dose without compromising target coverage or critical normal structure doses. This may translate into reduced acute and late radiation toxicity to the scalp. A prospective trial evaluating the clinical benefits of SSV is ongoing (NCT03251027).

Avoidance sectors to reduce dosimetric impact of an irreproducible pannus on setup uncertainty in prostate SBRT VMAT: A case study.

This work investigates whether the use of an avoidance sector in a two-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plan reduces dosimetric variations due to an irreproducible pannus. A morbidly obese patient with favorable-risk prostate cancer elected treatment with SBRT. The patient was treated with the avoidance arcs across the pannus to eliminate reproducibility issues created by daily pannus variability in set up. For post-treatment assessment, the case was planned using Varian Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS) with two VMAT arcs with and without 100° avoidance sectors across the pannus. The dose was re-calculated using the external body contour from four daily treatment cone-beam computer tomography scans, and on two virtual body contours created by expanding the pannus region of the external contour by 5 and 10 mm. Dose differences between planned and re-calculated rectal wall mean dose and the V24Gy were numerically larger in the absence of the avoidance sector for all fractions and for both simulated pannus variations, with maximum changes of 2.6% and 1.3%. Maximum point dose variations in the PTV, CTV, rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were 105 cGy or less for all cases, with and without the avoidance sector. The use of an avoidance sector across this large, asymmetrical pannus did not inhibit achieving dose constraints and provided a reduction in dose variability which was nominal in this case for 10 mm variations. Avoidance sectors can be safely implemented in cases with obvious reproducibility concerns in the setting of prostate VMAT SBRT.

Optimizing patient positioning for intensity modulated radiation therapy in hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Sparing the hippocampus during whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) offers potential neurocognitive benefits. However, previously reported intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans use multiple noncoplanar beams for treatment delivery. An optimized coplanar IMRT template for hippocampal-sparing WBRT would assist in clinical workflow and minimize resource utilization. In this study, we sought to determine the optimal patient position to facilitate coplanar treatment planning and delivery of hippocampal-sparing WBRT using IMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A variable angle, inclined board was utilized for patient positioning. An anthropomorphic phantom underwent computed tomography simulation at various head angles. The IMRT goals were designed to achieve target coverage of the brain while maintaining hippocampal dose-volume constraints designed to conform to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 protocol. Optimal head angle was then verified using data from 8 patients comparing coplanar and noncoplanar WBRT IMRT plans. RESULTS: Hippocampal, hippocampal avoidance region, and whole brain mean volumes were 1.1 cm(3), 12.5 cm(3), and 1185.1 cm(3), respectively. The hippocampal avoidance region occupied 1.1% of the whole brain planning volume. For the 30-degree head angle, a 7-field coplanar IMRT plan was generated, sparing the hippocampus to a maximum dose of 14.7 Gy; D100% of the hippocampus was 7.4 Gy and mean hippocampal dose was 9.3 Gy. In comparison, for flat head positioning the hippocampal Dmax was 22.9 Gy with a D100% of 9.2 Gy and mean dose of 11.7 Gy. Target coverage and dose homogeneity was comparable with previously published noncoplanar IMRT plans. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional supine positioning, an inclined head board at 30 degrees optimizes coplanar whole brain IMRT treatment planning. Clinically acceptable hippocampal-sparing WBRT dosimetry can be obtained using a simplified coplanar plan at a 30-degree head angle, thus obviating the need for complex and time consuming noncoplanar IMRT plans.

Radiation therapy for locally recurrent breast cancer.

Approximately one-third of all breast cancer patients experience local recurrence of their tumor after initial treatment. As initial treatment often employs the use of radiation therapy (RT), the standard of care for local breast cancer recurrence after initial breast conserving therapy has traditionally been surgical intervention with mastectomy. However, recent attempts to preserve the intact breast after recurrence with local excision have revealed a potential need for RT in addition to repeat breast conserving surgery as rates of local failure with resection alone remain high. Additionally, local recurrence following initial mastectomy and chest wall RT can be treated with reirradiation to increase local control. Repeating RT, however, in a previously irradiated area, is a complex treatment strategy, as the clinician must carefully balance maximizing treatment effectiveness while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. As a result, physicians have been hesitant to treat recurrent disease with repeat RT with limited data. Results from the current literature are promising and current clinical trials are underway to explore reirradiation modalities which will provide additional information on treatment-related toxicity and outcomes. This paper will review the current literature on repeat radiation therapy for locally recurrent breast cancer.