Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 61(6): e10-e13, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172407

ABSTRACT

The continued advancement of pharmacy practice demands highly skilled and knowledgeable pharmacy technicians to enhance the services provided. As technician responsibilities continue to evolve to include more advanced roles, the need for standardized technician training and certification is essential to advance the profession of pharmacy technicians and pharmacy practice. With only 45% of states requiring technician certification, great variation exists in the education and training competencies required for technicians practicing in the health system setting. While the gap in certified pharmacy technician workforce is significant, the advancing skills demanded of our technician workforce underscore the need for national standardization of technician certification requirements in the health system setting. Pharmacists, health systems, and legislators must commit to advancing the profession of pharmacy and advocate for a uniform, certified technician workforce as a professional standard.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy , Certification , Humans , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Technicians
3.
J Pharm Pract ; 32(6): 679-682, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30189781

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To raise awareness of cefotetan-induced hemolytic anemia, a known rare but serious side effect that occurred in 5 patients at our medical center. SUMMARY: Five cases of cefotetan-induced hemolytic anemia, which presented over the period of a single year at our center, are described. In each case, hemolytic anemia was confirmed by testing for the presence of anti-cefotetan antibodies. Each case occurred approximately 1 to 2 weeks following exposure to the drug. All five patients survived. A brief review of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is also discussed. CONCLUSION: DIIHA may be difficult to distinguish from other causes of hemolytic anemia, but should be included in the differential in patients exposed to medications associated with DIIHA. Once suspected, antibody testing should be performed, and once diagnosed, further exposure should be avoided.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Hemolytic/chemically induced , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefotetan/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Male
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 35(5): 536-45, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25940658

ABSTRACT

Leishmaniasis is a protozoan infection native to various countries, including those in South America and Southeast Asia. Although the incidence of leishmaniasis is low in the United States, it is an important cause of infection in individuals traveling to endemic areas. Various treatment modalities are available, depending on their availability in the geographic region. In the United States, the treatment of choice is considered to be liposomal amphotericin, although other therapies have been explored. In 2014, miltefosine became the first orally available medication approved for the treatment of leishmaniasis in the United States. Based on available data, miltefosine is a first-line option for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Miltefosine is equally efficacious to and may be as tolerable as liposomal amphotericin B. The most common adverse effects of miltefosine are vomiting, diarrhea, and transient liver enzyme level elevation. Miltefosine has not been readily available in the United States due to marketing delays and is expected to become available later this year. In the meantime, the drug may be obtained through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expanded-access investigational new drug protocol.


Subject(s)
Antiprotozoal Agents/therapeutic use , Leishmaniasis/drug therapy , Phosphorylcholine/analogs & derivatives , Drug Resistance , Humans , Leishmaniasis/parasitology , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/parasitology , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/parasitology , Phosphorylcholine/therapeutic use , United States
5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 72(12): 1013-9, 2015 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26025992

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) in the management of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is reviewed. SUMMARY: IVIG has a wide range of uses in clinical practice, including STSS and CDI. It is an attractive option for these two infections because both infections are toxin mediated, and IVIG may contain antibodies that neutralize these toxins. For STSS and CDI, IVIG is often considered for use in critically ill patients who are not responding to traditional therapies. Several encouraging case reports and retrospective chart reviews have been published, highlighting the potential benefit of IVIG in such patients. However, its definitive role remains unclear, mainly due to the lack of high-level evidence. Data supporting its use have been extrapolated from retrospective chart reviews and case reports in which profound heterogeneity in patient populations and treatment modalities exist. The use of IVIG must be weighed carefully because it is not a benign product. As with the use of IVIG for STSS, the role of IVIG for CDI is unclear. Nonetheless, IVIG may serve as a useful adjunct therapy for patients suffering from severe complicated CDI (shock, ileus, or megacolon) who do not respond to conventional treatment. Adverse reactions to IVIG are mild and transitory and occur during or immediately after drug infusion. CONCLUSION: Although randomized, controlled trials supporting the use of IVIG for STSS and CDI are lacking, IVIG may be considered a last-line adjunct therapy in those patients for whom the clinical benefit outweighs the potential adverse effects of therapy.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Animals , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Shock, Septic/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology
6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 34(10): 1091-101, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25052207

ABSTRACT

Hemophilia A (HA) represents one of the most common genetic bleeding disorders worldwide and results from a deficiency in factor VIII (FVIII). The mainstay of treatment for HA is repletion of FVIII. Numerous plasma-derived and recombinant factor concentrates are available, each with clinical advantages and disadvantages. Nonfactor products including desmopressin and antifibrinolytic agents can also be used, depending on the clinical situation and severity of FVIII deficiency. Turoctocog alfa is the most recent addition to recombinant FVIII concentrates available for the treatment of HA. Pharmacokinetic trials in animals and humans have demonstrated characteristics similar to those of other recombinant FVIII concentrates. Clinical trials have supported efficacy and safety in the management of HA in treatment-experienced patients; study results of turoctocog alfa in treatment-naïve patients are pending. A smaller study in hemophilic patients undergoing surgery has demonstrated positive results. Although turoctocog alfa was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2013, it will not be available on the market until 2015. Turoctocog alfa appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently available recombinant FVIII concentrates; however, its place in therapy among these products has yet to be elucidated.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/trends , Drug Approval/methods , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Humans , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Pharm Pract ; 26(5): 476-82, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24064436

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) describes any unexplained diarrhea associated with the use of an antibiotic. AAD also includes infection caused by Clostridium difficile, however this organism only accounts for a small percentage of diarrhea caused by antibiotics. AAD can be caused by multiple other organisms including C perfringens, S aureus, and Candida. Some antibiotics are more likely to cause non-C difficile AAD, such as erythromycin and the penicillin class. AAD develops through the loss of normal flora and reduced colonic bacterial carbohydrate metabolism during antibiotic administration. There is an increasing interest in the use of probiotics for the prevention of AAD. There are several meta-analyses that report a relative risk reduction of AAD with the use of probiotics during antibiotic administration. Interpretation of these studies has been challenging due to the heterogeneity and size of the patient populations, unclear probiotic regimen, and unclear safety profile. Since AAD can be a reason for a patient to become non-compliant or receive incomplete treatment, clinicians should monitor for this potential adverse effect caused by antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Carbohydrate Metabolism/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Colon/metabolism , Colon/microbiology , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/microbiology , Drug Monitoring/methods , Humans , Medication Adherence , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Probiotics/adverse effects
8.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 17(1): 12-30, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23118656

ABSTRACT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare and serious reaction to unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins in children. Quick recognition, discontinuation of heparin, and subsequent treatment with an alternative anticoagulant are essential steps to prevent serious complications such as thrombus and limb amputation. The purpose of this review is to describe the clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in children and to summarize the data available for its management. This paper summarizes data and relates the use of direct thrombin inhibitors with clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted with Ovid, using the key terms argatroban, bivalirudin, hirulog, danaparoid, lepirudin, direct thrombin inhibitor, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, warfarin, and fondaparinux. Articles were excluded if they were classified as editorials, review articles, or conference abstracts or if they involved patients 18 years of age or older or described disease states not related to thrombosis. Nineteen articles containing 33 case reports were identified and evaluated for this review. Of the 33 cases, 14, 10, 4, and 2 cases described the use of lepirudin, danaparoid, argatroban, and bivalirudin, respectively. Two cases did not report the type of anticoagulant used, and 1 case used aspirin. The most commonly reported complication was bleeding.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...