Grade II meningiomas and Gamma Knife radiosurgery: analysis of success and failure to improve treatment paradigm.

OBJECTIVE Grade II meningiomas, which currently account for 25% of all meningiomas, are subject to multiple recurrences throughout the course of the disease and represent a challenge for the neurosurgeon. Radiosurgery is increasingly performed for the treatment of Grade II meningiomas and is quite efficient in controlling relapses locally at the site of the lesion, but it cannot prevent margin relapses. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the technical parameters involved in producing marginal relapses and to optimize loco-marginal control to improve therapeutic strategy. METHODS Eighteen patients presenting 58 lesions were treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2010 and 2015 in Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière. The median patient age was 68 years (25%-75% interval: 61-72 years), and the sex ratio (M/F) was 13:5. The median delay between surgery and first GKRS was 3 years. Patients were classified as having Grade II meningioma using World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 criteria. The tumor growth rate was computed by comparing 2 volumetric measurements before treatment. After GKRS, iterative MRI, performed every 6 months, detected a relapse if tumor volume increased by more than 20%. Patterns of relapse were defined as being local, marginal, or distal. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between criterion and potential risk factors was tested by the log-rank test and univariable Cox model. RESULTS The median follow-up was 36 months (range 8-57 months). During this period, 3 patients presented with a local relapse, 5 patients with a marginal relapse, and 7 patients with a distal relapse. Crude local control was 84.5%. The local control actuarial rate was 89% at 1 year and 71% at 3 years. The marginal control actuarial rate was 81% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years. The distal control actuarial rate was 100% at 1 year, 81% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years. Median distal control was 38 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 71% at 1 year, 36% at 2 years, and 23% at 3 years. Median PFS was 18 months. Lesions treated with a minimum radiation dose of ≤ 12 Gy had significantly more local relapses than those treated with a dose > 12 Gy (p = 0.04) in univariate analysis. Marginal control was significantly influenced by tumor growth rate, with a lower growth rate being highly associated with improved marginal control (p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a relationship between dose and marginal control, but it was not significant (p = 0.09). PFS was significantly associated with delay between first surgery and GKRS (p = 0.03). The authors noticed few complications with no sequelae. CONCLUSIONS In order to optimize loco-marginal control, radiosurgical treatment should require a minimum dose of > 12 Gy and an extended target volume along the dural insertion. Ideally, these parameters should correspond to the aggressiveness of the lesion, based on genetic features of the tumor.

Predictors of Trigeminal Neuropathy After Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between dosimetric characteristics and symptoms related to trigeminal neuropathy (TN) observed after radiosurgery (RS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS); to propose guidelines to optimize planification in VS RS regarding TN preservation; and to detail the mechanism of TN impairment after VS RS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred seventy-nine patients treated between 2011 and 2013 for VS RS and without trigeminal impairment before RS were included in a retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of TN among characteristics of the patients, the dosimetry, and the VS. RESULTS: There were 20 Koos grade 1, 99 grade 2, 57 grade 3, and 3 grade 4. Fourteen patients (7.8%) presented a transitory or permanent TN. Between the patients with and without TN after VS RS, there was no significant difference regarding dosimetry or VS volume itself. Significant differences (univariate analysis P<.05, Mann-Whitney test) were found for parameters related to the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve: total integrated dose, maximum dose, mean dose, volume of the Vth nerve (Volv), and volume of the Vth nerve receiving at least 11 Gy (VolVcist>11Gy), but also for maximal dose to the Vth nerve nucleus and intra-axial portion (Dose maxVax). After multivariate analysis, the best model predicting TN included VolVcist>11Gy (P=.0045), Dose maxVax (P=.0006), and Volv (P=.0058). The negative predictive value of this model was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters VolVcist>11Gy, Dose maxVax, and Volv should be checked when designing dosimetry for VS RS.

Minimized doses for linear accelerator radiosurgery of brainstem metastasis.

PURPOSE: Treatment of cerebral metastases located inside the brainstem remains a challenge, as the brainstem is considered to be a neurological organ at risk, whatever the treatment strategy. We report a retrospective study of 30 consecutive patients treated in our institution between 2005 and 2007 with micromultileaf linear accelerator (LINAC)-radiosurgery for brainstem metastases, with reduced doses compared to those usually reported in the literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mean follow-up was 311 days (range, 41-1351). Median age was 57 years (range, 37-82), Mean Karnofsky Index (KI) was 80. Primary tumor site was lung (n = 13), breast (n = 4), kidney (n = 4), skin (melanoma; n = 3), and others (n = 6). Primary tumor was controlled in 17 cases; extracranial metastases were controlled in 12 cases. Mean number of metastases was 1.46 (one to three); median volume was 2.82 cc (0.06-18). Dose was delivered by a micromultileaf collimator 6-MV LINAC . RESULTS: Dose administered at the 70% isodose was 13.4 Gy (range, 8.2-15). Median survival was 10 months. Local control rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 100%, 100%, and 79% respectively. Median neurological control duration was 5 months. Neurological control rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 73%, 42%, and 25%, respectively. No parameter was found to significantly correlate with survival, local, or cerebral control. No patients had severe side effects (Grade III-IV), according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. CONCLUSION: Lower doses than previously reported can achieve the same local control and survival rates in brain metastases, with minimal side effects.

Predictive factors of radiation necrosis after radiosurgery for cerebral metastases.

The aim of this study was to determine if the risk of radiation necrosis after radiosurgery is related to the presence of normal tissue included in the prescription volume. Between 1994 and 2001, 377 patients representing 760 lesions were treated by radiosurgery in our center with a 10-MV LINAC. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 30-86 years), median tumor volume was 4.9 cm(3), median peripheral dose (70%) was 15.6 Gy and median dose at the isocenter was 21.6 Gy. Karnofsky index, disease control and number of lesions were the only parameters significantly influencing survival (median 8.6 months), while disease-free survival was correlated with the number of isocenters. Seven percent of the patients presented severe complications, including nine episodes of radiation necrosis. The only parameter influencing the risk of radiation necrosis was the conformity index (p = 0.001). These findings emphasize the importance of reducing falsely irradiated normal tissue during radiosurgery to prevent radiation necrosis.

Brachytherapy of glioblastoma recurring in previously irradiated territory: predictive value of tumor volume.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of tumor volume on survival of patients reirradiated with (192)Ir for recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 1997, 42 patients with recurrent glioblastomas (29 males and 13 females, age 18-69 years, median age 49) were treated with (192)Ir implantation. Previous treatments included surgery, external beam radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Maximum diameter of the recurrent tumor was 1.2-10.1 cm (median: 5.7 cm) and tumor volume was 1.6-122 cm(3) (median: 23 cm(3)). Karnofsky performance status score was 50-100 (median: 80). Brachytherapy dose was 40-60 Gy. RESULTS: Probability of overall survival was 80% at 6 months, 48% at 1 year, and 11% at 2 years. Median survival was 50 weeks. Univariate analysis showed that both tumor volume (T < or T > or = 30 cm(3)) and Karnofsky performance status score were significant predictors of survival. Multivariate analysis showed that smaller tumor volumes were associated with a higher probability of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor volume less than 30 cm(3) was associated with a higher probability of, and quality of, survival than larger lesions for patients reirradiated by brachytherapy for recurrent glioblastoma.