Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Engl J Med ; 349(9): 847-58, 2003 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12944570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft vasculopathy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing everolimus with azathioprine in recipients of a first heart transplant. METHODS: A total of 634 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg of everolimus per day (209 patients), 3.0 mg of everolimus per day (211 patients), or 1.0 to 3.0 mg of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight per day (214 patients), in combination with cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and statins. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, graft loss or retransplantation, loss to follow-up, biopsy-proved acute rejection of grade 3A, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. RESULTS: At six months, the percentage of patients who had reached the primary efficacy end point was significantly smaller in the group given 3.0 mg of everolimus (27.0 percent, P<0.001) and the group given 1.5 mg of everolimus (36.4 percent, P=0.03) than in the azathioprine group (46.7 percent). Intravascular ultrasonography showed that the average increase in maximal intimal thickness 12 months after transplantation was significantly smaller in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. The incidence of vasculopathy was also significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (35.7 percent, P=0.045) and the 3.0-mg group (30.4 percent, P=0.01) than in the azathioprine group (52.8 percent). The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (7.7 percent, P<0.001) and the 3.0-mg group (7.6 percent, P<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (21.5 percent). Rates of bacterial infection were significantly higher in the 3.0-mg group than in the azathioprine group. Serum creatinine levels were also significantly higher in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was more efficacious than azathioprine in reducing the severity and incidence of cardiac-allograft vasculopathy, suggesting that everolimus therapy may alleviate this serious problem.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Heart Transplantation , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Everolimus , Female , Graft Rejection/physiopathology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Sirolimus/adverse effects , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Transplantation, Homologous , Tunica Intima/pathology , Ultrasonography, Interventional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...