Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 22 Suppl 2: 438-518, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35266615

ABSTRACT

For the first time in a decade, both the number of candidates added to the waiting list and the number of lung transplants performed decreased from the year prior; the number of lung donors also declined. This slowing of transplant activities in 2020 was associated with a modest increase in waitlist mortality. The year 2020 was notable for the global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which undoubtedly influenced all trends noted in lung transplantation. Time to transplant continued to decrease, with a median time to transplant of 1.4 months across all waitlist candidates. Posttransplant survival remained stable, with 89.4% of transplant recipients surviving to 1 year, 74.8% to 3 years, and 61.2% to 5 years.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tissue and Organ Procurement , COVID-19/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Lung , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tissue Donors , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists
2.
Am J Transplant ; 21 Suppl 2: 441-520, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595190

ABSTRACT

The number of lung transplants performed continues to increase annually and reached an all-time high in 2019, with decreasing waitlist mortality. These trends are attributable to an increasing number of candidates listed for transplant each year and a continuing increase in the number of donors. Despite these favorable trends, 6.4% of lungs recovered for transplant were not transplanted in 2019, and strategies to optimize use of these available organs may reduce the number of waitlist even further. Time to transplant continued to decrease, as over 50% of candidates waited 3 months or less in 2019, yet regional heterogeneity remained despite policy changes intended to improve allocation equity. Small gains continued in posttransplant survival, with 1-year survival at 88.8%; 3 year, 74.4%; 5 year, 59.2%, and 10 year, 33.1 %.


Subject(s)
Tissue and Organ Procurement , Graft Survival , Humans , Lung , Tissue Donors , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists
3.
Am J Transplant ; 20 Suppl s1: 427-508, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898416

ABSTRACT

The primary goal of US lung allocation policy is to ensure that candidates with the highest risk for mortality receive appropriate access to lung transplant. In 2018, 2562 lung transplants were performed in the US, reflecting a 31% increase over the past 5 years. More candidates are being listed for lung transplant, and the number of donors has increased substantially. Despite an increase of 84 lung transplants in 2018, 365 adult candidates died or became too sick to undergo transplant. In 2018, 24 new child (ages 0-11 years) candidates were added to the lung transplant waiting list. Fifteen lung transplants were performed in recipients aged 0-11 years, three in recipients aged younger than 1 year, two in recipients aged 1-5 years, and ten in recipients aged 6-11 years. Of 27 child candidates removed from the waiting list in 2018, 16 (59.3%) were removed due to undergoing transplant, six (22.2%) due to death, one (3.7%) due to improved condition, and one (3.7%) due to becoming too sick to undergo transplant.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Resource Allocation , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Waiting Lists , Graft Survival , Humans , United States
4.
Am J Transplant ; 19 Suppl 2: 404-484, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811892

ABSTRACT

Each year since 2012, the number of lung transplants has increased, reflecting an increase in the number of donors, improved use of recovered organs, and more candidates being listed for transplant. However, the need for organs continues to outpace available donors. Despite an increase of 126 donors in 2017, 1360 candidates remained on the waiting list at the end of the year, and 326 patients died or became too sick to undergo transplant. Approximately 14,000 individuals were living with a lung transplant in 2017; 9492 were aged 50 years or older, 4075 were aged 18-49 years, and 408 were aged younger than 18 years.


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Lung Transplantation/methods , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Annual Reports as Topic , Humans , United States , Waiting Lists
5.
Am J Transplant ; 18 Suppl 1: 363-433, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29292602

ABSTRACT

In 2016, 2692 candidates aged 12 years or older were added to the lung transplant waiting list; 2345 transplants were performed, the largest number of any prior year. The median waiting time for listed candidates in 2016 was 2.5 months, and waiting times were shortest for group D candidates. The transplant rate increased to 191.9 transplants per 100 waitlist years in 2016, with a slight decrease in waitlist mortality to 15.1 deaths per 100 waitlist years. Short-term survival continued to improve, with a 6-month death rate of 6.6% and a 1-year death rate of 10.8% among recipients in 2015 compared with 8.0% and 13.3%, respectively, among recipients in 2014. Long-term survival rates remained unchanged; 55.6% of recipients were alive at 5 years. In 2016, 23 new candidates aged 0-11 years were added to the waiting list and 16 lung transplants were performed. Incidence of posttransplant mortality for lung transplant recipients aged 0-11 years who underwent transplant in 2014-2015 was 13.8% at 6 months and 19.6% at 1 year. Changes in waitlist and transplant demographic features continued to evolve following implementation of the revised lung allocation score in 2015. Some early trends that may be attributable to the revised LAS are shorter waiting times, stabilization of the number of group D candidates listed for transplant, and convergence of LAS with lower prevalence of extremely high scores.


Subject(s)
Annual Reports as Topic , Graft Survival , Lung Transplantation , Resource Allocation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Waiting Lists , Humans , Registries , Tissue Donors , United States
6.
Am J Transplant ; 17 Suppl 1: 357-424, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28052607

ABSTRACT

In 2015, 2409 active candidates aged 12 years or older were added to the lung transplant waiting list; 2072 transplants were performed, the most of any year. The median waiting time for candidates listed in 2015 was 3.4 months; the shortest waiting time was for diagnosis group D. Despite the highest recorded transplant rate of 157 per 100 waitlist years, waitlist mortality continued a steady decade-long rise to a high of 16.5 deaths per 100 waitlist years. Measures of short- and long-term survival showed no trend toward improved overall survival in the past 5 years, except that 6-month death rates decreased from 9.4% in 2005 to 7.9% in 2014. At 5 years posttransplant, 55.5% of recipients remained alive. In 2015, 23 new child (ages 0-11 years) candidates were added to the list; 17 transplants were performed. Incidence of death was 6.1% at 6 months and 8.2% at 1 year for transplants in 2013-2014. Important policy changes will affect access to transplant. In February 2015, OPTN implemented a comprehensive revision of the lung allocation score to better reflect mortality risk. Broader geographic sharing of donor lungs for pediatric candidates and allowance for selected transplants across blood types for candidates aged younger than 2 years have been approved and are expected to improve pediatric access to transplant. The impact of these changes on lung transplant trends will be observed in the coming years.


Subject(s)
Annual Reports as Topic , Graft Survival , Lung Transplantation , Resource Allocation , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents , Treatment Outcome , United States , Waiting Lists
7.
Am J Transplant ; 16 Suppl 2: 169-94, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26755268

ABSTRACT

While the costs to Medicare of solid organ transplants are varied and considerable, the total Medicare expenditure of $4.2 billion for solid organ transplant recipients in 2013 remains less than 1% of all Medicare expenditures. Kidney transplant remains one of the most cost-effective surgical interventions in medicine and exhibits a rare feature in that it is generally known to be cost-saving in the long term. For patients covered by Medicare, lung transplant is one of the more costly solid organ transplants performed. This chapter reports pretransplant costs for lung candidates to allow investigators to further explore the relative cost of lung transplant compared with alternative management.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Organ Transplantation/economics , Organ Transplantation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Medicare , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Patient Readmission , United States , Young Adult
8.
Am J Transplant ; 16 Suppl 2: 141-68, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26755267

ABSTRACT

Lungs are allocated to adult and adolescent transplant candidates (aged ≥ 12 years) on the basis of age, geography, blood type compatibility, and the lung allocation score (LAS), which reflects risk of waitlist mortality and probability of posttransplant survival. In 2014, 2458 active candidates aged 12 years or older, the most of any year, were added to the list; 1949 transplants were performed. Overall median waiting time to transplant for candidates listed in 2014 was 3.7 months. Candidates undergoing lung transplant in 2014 were sicker than ever before with median LAS 44.4. Measures of short-term survival continue to improve; however, long-term survival has plateaued since the implementation of the LAS in 2005; at 5 years posttransplant, 42.4% of recipients had died. In 2014, 30 new active child (ages 0-11) candidates were added to the list; 19 transplants were performed. Incidence of patient death was 7.1% at 6 months and 10.8% at 1 year for transplants in 2013, 29.7% at 3 years for transplants in 2009-2010, and 42.7% at 5 years for transplants in 2007-2008. By age, 5-year patient survival was poorest for recipients aged younger than 1 year.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/surgery , Lung Transplantation/methods , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
9.
Am J Transplant ; 16(3): 930-7, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523747

ABSTRACT

US pediatric transplant candidates have limited access to lung transplant due to the small number of donors within current geographic boundaries, leading to assertions that the current lung allocation system does not adequately serve pediatric patients. We hypothesized that broader geographic sharing of pediatric (adolescent, 12-17 years; child, <12 years) donor lungs would increase pediatric candidate access to transplant. We used the thoracic simulated allocation model to simulate broader geographic sharing. Simulation 1 used current allocation rules. Simulation 2 offered adolescent donor lungs across a wider geographic area to adolescents. Simulation 3 offered child donor lungs across a wider geographic area to adolescents. Simulation 4 combined simulations 2 and 3. Simulation 5 prioritized adolescent donor lungs to children across a wider geographic area. Simulation 4 resulted in 461 adolescent transplants per 100 patient-years on the waiting list (range 417-542), compared with 206 (range 180-228) under current rules. Simulation 5 resulted in 388 adolescent transplants per 100 patient-years on the waiting list (range 348-418) and likely increased transplant rates for children. Adult transplant rates, waitlist mortality, and 1-year posttransplant mortality were not adversely affected. Broader geographic sharing of pediatric donor lungs may increase pediatric candidate access to lung transplant.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/trends , Lung Transplantation/trends , Residence Characteristics , Resource Allocation/trends , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prognosis , Regional Health Planning/trends , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Waiting Lists , Young Adult
10.
Am J Transplant ; 15 Suppl 2: 1-28, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25626342

ABSTRACT

Lungs are allocated to adult and adolescent transplant candidates (aged ⩾ 12 years) on the basis of age, geography, blood type compatibility, and the lung allocation score (LAS), which reflects risk of waitlist mortality and probability of posttransplant survival. In 2013, the most adult candidates, 2394, of any year were added to the list. Overall median waiting time for candidates listed in 2013 was 4.0 months. The preferred procedure remained bilateral lung transplant, representing approximately 70% of lung transplants in 2013. Measures of short-term and longterm survival have plateaued since the implementation of the LAS in 2005. The number of new child candidates (aged 0-11 years) added to the lung transplant waiting list increased to 39 in 2013. A total of 28 lung transplants were performed in child recipients, 3 for ages younger than 1 year, 9 for ages 1 to 5 years, and 16 for ages 6 to 11 years. The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension was associated with higher survival rates than cystic fibrosis or other diagnosis (pulmonary fibrosis, bronchiolitis obliterans, bronchopulmonary dysplasia). For child candidates, infection was the leading cause of death in year 1 posttransplant and graft failure in years 2 to 5.


Subject(s)
Annual Reports as Topic , Lung Diseases/surgery , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors , Waiting Lists , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Resource Allocation , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
11.
Am J Transplant ; 14(1): 178-83, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24330259

ABSTRACT

On June 5, 2013, a US Federal Court ordered a temporary restraining order to allow two children within the court's jurisdiction to be registered on the adolescent lung transplant waiting list. On June 10, 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network's Executive Committee altered lung allocation policy to offer candidates aged younger than 12 years greater access to adult lungs at the discretion of the national Lung Review Board. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients reviewed trends over time in deceased donor lung transplant waitlist mortality and transplant rates, comparing children and adults. Mortality rates of candidates active on the waiting list have been higher for children aged 0-5 years, but have not differed for children aged 6-11 years compared with adolescents aged 12-17 years or adults aged 18 years or older. Transplant rates among active waitlist candidates have been comparable across all age groups. Thus, there is little evidence that the allocation system led to differences in waitlist mortality or transplant rates for children compared with adults. However, these comparisons are difficult to interpret given that current policies likely led to unaccounted differences in the severity of illness at the time of listing.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Waiting Lists/mortality , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Tissue Donors , United States
12.
Am J Transplant ; 14 Suppl 1: 139-65, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24373171

ABSTRACT

Lung transplants are increasingly used as treatment for end-stage lung diseases not amenable to other medical and surgical therapies. Lungs are allocated to adult and adolescent transplant candidates on the basis of age, geography, blood type compatibility, and the Lung Allocation Score, which reflects risk of wait-list mortality and probability of posttransplant survival. The overall median waiting time in 2012 was 4 months, and 65.3% of candidates underwent transplant within 1 year of listing; however, this proportion varied greatly by donation service area. Unadjusted median survival of lung transplant recipients was 5.3 years in 2012, and median survival conditional on living for 1 year posttransplant was 6.7 years. Among pediatric lung candidates in 2012, 32.1% were wait-listed for less than 1 year, 17.9% for 1 to less than 2 years, 16.7% for 2 to less than 4 years, and 33.3% for 4 or more years. Both graft and patient survival have continued to improve; survival rates for recipients aged 6-11 years are better than for younger recipients. Compared with recipients of other solid organ transplants, lung transplant recipients experienced the highest rates of rehospitalization for transplant complications: 43.7 per 100 patients in year 1 and 36.0 in year 2.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Graft Survival , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Infant , Lung Transplantation/economics , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Patient Readmission , Reoperation , Resource Allocation , Survival Rate , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Waiting Lists/mortality
13.
Am J Transplant ; 13 Suppl 1: 149-77, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23237700

ABSTRACT

Lungs are allocated in part based on the Lung Allocation Score (LAS), which considers risk of death without transplant and posttransplant. Wait-list additions have been increasing steadily after an initial decline following LAS implementation. In 2011, the largest number of adult candidates were added to the waiting list in a single year since 1998; donation and transplant rates have been unable to keep pace with wait-list additions. Candidates aged 65 years or older have been added faster than candidates in other age groups. After an initial decline following LAS implementation, wait-list mortality increased to 15.7 per 100 wait-list years in 2011. Short- and long-term graft survival improved in 2011; 10-year graft failure fell to an all-time low. Since 1998, the number of new pediatric (aged 0-11 years) candidates added yearly to the waiting list has declined. In 2011, 19 pediatric lung transplants were performed, a transplant rate of 34.7 per 100 wait-list years. The percentage of patients hospitalized before transplant has not changed. Both graft and patient survival have continued to improve over the past decade. Posttransplant complications for pediatric lung transplant recipients, similar to complications for adult recipients, include hypertension, renal dysfunction, diabetes, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and malignancy.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists
14.
Am J Transplant ; 12(12): 3213-34, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22974276

ABSTRACT

Lung and heart allocation in the United States has evolved over the past 20-30 years to better serve transplant candidates and improve organ utilization. The current lung allocation policy, based on the Lung Allocation Score, attempts to take into account risk of death on the waiting list and chance of survival posttransplant. This policy is flexible and can be adjusted to improve the predictive ability of the score. Similarly, in response to the changing clinical phenotype of heart transplant candidates, heart allocation policies have evolved to a multitiered algorithm that attempts to prioritize organs to the most infirm, a designation that fluctuates with trends in therapy. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and its committees have been responsive, as demonstrated by recent modifications to pediatric heart allocation and mechanical circulatory support policies and by ongoing efforts to ensure that heart allocation policies are equitable and current. Here we examine the development of US lung and heart allocation policy, evaluate the application of the current policy on clinical practice and explore future directions for lung and heart allocation.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/trends , Lung Transplantation/trends , Tissue and Organ Procurement/trends , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , United States , Waiting Lists
15.
Clin Transplant ; 25(2): 185-90, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21158924

ABSTRACT

Living organ donors - 50% of solid organ donors in the United States - represent a unique population who accept medical risk for the benefit of another. One of the main justifications for this practice has been respect for donor autonomy, as realized through informed consent. In this retrospective study of living donors, we investigate two key criteria of informed consent: (i) depth of understanding and (ii) degree of voluntariness. In our survey of 262 living kidney donors 2-40 months post-donation, we found that more than 90% understood the effects of living donation on recipient outcomes, the screening process, and the short-term medical risks of donation. In contrast, only 69% understood the psychological risks of donation; 52% the long-term medical risks of donation; and 32% the financial risks of donation. Understanding the effects of living donation on recipient outcomes was the only factor that would affect donors' decision to donate again. A total of 40% of donors reported feeling some pressure to donate. Donors who are related to the recipient were more likely to report feeling pressure to donate. We conclude that more studies of informed consent are needed to identify factors that may compromise the validity of informed consent.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Informed Consent/psychology , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Living Donors/psychology , Attitude to Health , Humans , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , United States
16.
Am J Transplant ; 9(4 Pt 2): 942-58, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19341417

ABSTRACT

This article highlights trends and changes in lung and heart-lung transplantation in the United States from 1998 to 2007. The most significant change over the last decade was implementation of the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) allocation system in May 2005. Subsequently, the number of active wait-listed lung candidates declined 54% from pre-LAS (2004) levels to the end of 2007; there was also a reduction in median waiting time, from 792 days in 2004 to 141 days in 2007. The number of lung transplants performed yearly increased through the decade to a peak of 1 465 in 2007; the greatest single year increase occurred in 2005. Despite candidates with increasingly higher LAS scores being transplanted in the LAS era, recipient death rates have remained relatively stable since 2003 and better than in previous years. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis became the most common diagnosis group to receive a lung transplant in 2007 while emphysema was the most common diagnosis in previous years. The number of retransplants and transplants in those aged > or =65 performed yearly have increased significantly since 1998, up 295% and 643%, respectively. A decreasing percentage of lung transplant recipients are children (3.5% in 2007, n = 51). With LAS refinement ongoing, monitoring of future impact is warranted.


Subject(s)
Heart-Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists , Adult , Age Distribution , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Child , Emphysema/epidemiology , Emphysema/surgery , Heart-Lung Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Pulmonary Fibrosis/epidemiology , Pulmonary Fibrosis/surgery , Registries , Resource Allocation/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Survivors , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...