Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Foods ; 10(10)2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34681512

ABSTRACT

Oral food challenge (OFC) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of food allergies. However, this test is not without risks, given that severe allergic reactions can be triggered while it is conducted. The purpose of this study is to identify potential demographic variables, clinical characteristics of the patients and biomarkers that may be associated with severe reactions during the hazelnut oral challenge test. The sample included 22 children allergic to hazelnut who underwent a tree nut skin prick test (SPT), specific IgE (sIgE) to hazelnut, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) with different hazelnut allergens (Cor a 1, Cor a 8, Cor a 9, Cor a 11, Cor a 14), and a single-blind placebo-controlled challenge with hazelnut. A statistically significant relationship was found between the severity of the reaction and the highest values of sIgE to hazelnut, Cor a 11 and Cor a 14, cumulative symptom-triggering dose and sunflower seed sensitization. The use of the CRD is a useful tool to identify patients at higher risk of developing a severe reaction. In this pediatric population sample from Spain, storage proteins were confirmed to be most involved in hazelnut allergy and the development of severe reactions.

2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 5: 247, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30364207

ABSTRACT

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was first described in the 1990s, showing an increasing incidence and prevalence since then, being the leading cause of food impaction and the major cause of dysphagia. Probably, in a few years, EoE may no longer be considered a rare disease. Methods: This article discusses new aspects of the pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of EoE according to the last published guidelines. Results: The epidemiological studies indicate a multifactorial origin for EoE, where environmental and genetic factors take part. EoE affects both children and adults and it is frequently associated with atopic disease and IgE-mediated food allergies. In patients undergoing oral immunotherapy for desensitization from IgE-mediated food allergy the risk of developing EoE is 2.72%. Barrier dysfunction and T-helper 2 inflammation is considered to be pathogenetically important factors. There are different patterns of clinical presentation varying with age and can be masked by adaptation habits. Besides, symptoms do not usually correlate with histologic disease activity. The diagnostic criteria for EoE has evolved but mainly requires symptoms of esophageal dysfunction with histologic evidence of a peak value of at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field. Endoscopies have to be repeated in order to diagnose, monitor, and treat EoE. Treatment of EoE can be started either by drugs (PPIs and topical corticosteroids) or elimination diets. The multistage step-up elimination diet management approach of EoE is promising. Endoscopic dilation is used for patients with severe dysphagia/food impaction with inadequate response to anti-inflammatory treatment. Conclusions: Research in recent years has contributed to a better understanding of EoE's pathogenesis, genetic background, natural history, allergy workup, standardization in assessment of disease activity, evaluation of minimally invasive diagnostic tools, and new therapeutic approaches. However, several unmet needs are to be solved urgently, as finding a non-invasive disease-monitoring methods and biomarkers for routine practice, the development or new therapies, novel food allergy testing to detect triggering foods, drug, and doses required for initial therapy and safety issues with long-term maintenance therapy, amongst others. Besides, multidisciplinary management units of EoE, involving gastroenterologists, pediatricians, allergists, pathologists, dietitians, and ENT specialists are needed.

3.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 121(2): 235-244.e3, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29803713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic guidelines for penicillin allergy in children recommend cumbersome protocols based partially on data from adults, which may be suboptimal for pediatric use. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of tools for diagnosis of penicillin allergy in children. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in children with reported adverse events related to penicillin, excluding severe reactions. All patients underwent a uniform diagnostic protocol that consisted of clinical history, skin tests, serum specific IgE (sIgE), and, regardless of these results, drug provocation tests (DPTs). RESULTS: A total of 732 children (mean age, 5.5 years; 51.2% males) completed the allergy workup, including DPTs. Amoxicillin triggered 96.9% of all reactions. None of the patients with an immediate index reaction (IR) developed a reaction on DPT. Penicillin allergy was confirmed in 35 children (4.8%): 6 immediate reactions (17%) and 29 nonimmediate reactions (83%) on the DPT. No severe reactions were recorded. The allergist diagnosis based on the clinical history was not associated with the DPT final outcome. In 30 of 33 allergic patients (91%), the results of all skin tests and sIgE tests were negative. A logistic regression model identified the following to be associated with penicillin allergy: a family history of drug allergy (odds ratio [OR], 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-6.89; P = .008), an IR lasting more than 3 days vs 24 hours or less (OR, 8.96; 95% CI, 2.01-39.86; P = .004), and an IR treated with corticosteroids (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.30-5.54; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Conventional predictors of allergy to penicillin performed weakly. The authors propose straightforward penicillin provocation testing in controlled, experienced centers for the diagnosis of nonsevere penicillin allergy in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Penicillins/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Female , Humans , Immunization , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Medical History Taking , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Skin Tests
4.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res ; 9(1): 35-42, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27826960

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy to induce clinical desensitization to cow's milk (CM) of an oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocol in a pediatric population with cow's milk allergy (CMA). In addition, the immune responses against ß-casein, of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CMA patients, before and after the protocol were evaluated and compared to a nonallergic population. METHODS: A group of 20 children with IgE-mediated CMA and 15 nonallergic children were recruited. Allergic subjects underwent an OIT protocol based on weekly doses of commercial semi-skimmed ultra-high temperature treated (UHT) CM, followed by a maintenance phase. Immune profiles and changes in all subjects were investigated by measuring Th1, Th2, and Treg cytokines, transcription factors, and specific IgE and IgG4 levels. RESULTS: The CM-OIT protocol enabled to desensitize 70% of the allergic patients. Successful OIT was accompanied by significant increases in casein-specific IgG4 levels, together with a reduction in the concentration of antigen-specific IgE and in IL-5, IL-13, and IL-10 production by ß-casein-stimulated PBMCs. Baseline significant differences observed between allergic and nonallergic children in IL-13 and IL-5 levels were no longer found once the protocol had finished. CONCLUSIONS: The OIT protocol was safe and effective in inducing milk desensitization in 70% of the children with CMA, leading to alterations in their immune profiles toward a nonallergic phenotype.

5.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 114(6): 504-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25935429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the efficacy of food oral immunotherapy (OIT) is not robust enough to change clinical practice from current standard management. Furthermore, the immunologic changes underlying food desensitization are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To establish the immunologic basal status and differences between an egg-allergic group of children and a population of nonallergic children and to investigate the safety and efficacy of a specific egg OIT protocol to induce clinical desensitization and the associated immune responses. METHODS: Children with or without egg allergy were recruited. Allergic subjects underwent an OIT protocol based on weekly doses of egg protein and a maintenance phase. Immune profile and changes in all subjects were investigated by measuring T-helper cells types 1 and 2 (TH1 and TH2) and T-regulatory cytokines and transcription factors and egg-specific IgE and IgG4 levels. RESULTS: At baseline, a significantly lower production of ovalbumin-specific interleukin (IL)-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α and a trend toward higher IL-5 and IL-13 were found in allergic children. The egg OIT protocol enabled 60% of them to ingest 32 mL of egg white. Significant increases in egg-specific IgG4 levels and IL-10 production, with a trend toward lower IL-5 and IL-13 and higher tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ levels, and significant decreases in egg-specific IgE concentration were observed. CONCLUSION: Egg-allergic individuals display a bias toward TH2 type cytokine production and decreased TH1 and IL-10 responses compared with nonallergic individuals. The OIT protocol was safe and effective in inducing egg desensitization, leading to a shift in the immune profile of allergic individuals toward a nonallergic phenotype.


Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Egg Hypersensitivity/therapy , Egg Proteins/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Allergens/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytokines/blood , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Egg Hypersensitivity/immunology , Egg Proteins/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Lymphocyte Count , Male , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 19(7): 573-9, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18950323

ABSTRACT

Fish and its derived products play an important role in human nutrition, but they may also be a potent food allergen. Fish can be an ingested, contact, and inhalant allergen. Gad c I, a Parvalbumin, the major allergen in codfish, is considered as fish and amphibian pan-allergen. Prevalence of fish allergy appears to depend on the amount of fish eaten in the local diet. In Europe, the highest consumption occurs in Scandinavian countries, Spain and Portugal. In Spain, fish is the third most frequent allergen in children under 2 yr of age after egg and cow's milk. An adverse reaction to fish may be of non-allergic origin, due to food contamination or newly formed toxic products, but the most frequent type of adverse reactions to fish are immunologic-mediated reactions (allergic reactions). Such allergic reactions may be both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated. Most cases are IgE-mediated, due to ingestion or contact with fish or as a result of inhalation of cooking vapors. Some children develop non-IgE-mediated type allergies such as food protein induced enterocolitis syndrome. The clinical symptoms related to IgE-mediated fish allergy are most frequently acute urticaria and angioedema as well as mild oral symptoms, worsening of atopic dermatitis, respiratory symptoms such as rhinitis or asthma, and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. Anaphylaxis may also occur. Among all the species studied, those from the Tunidae and Xiphiidae families appear to be the least allergenic.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Fish Products/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Child, Preschool , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/pathology , Humans , Infant , Male , Urticaria/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...