Inflammatory profile in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and sarcopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia is characterized by the loss of muscle mass and strength associated with aging; however, individuals with chronic diseases are at risk at the early stages. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sustained chronic inflammation influences muscle deterioration. It may expedite the development of sarcopenia, which has been linked to physical disability, cardiovascular events, disease activity of RA, and premature death. We aimed to compare the inflammatory profiles of patients with RA with and without sarcopenia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 165 women with RA. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to criteria established by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. To assess the inflammatory profile, concentrations of cytokines such as EGF, IL-17, IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNFα, TNFß, and creatine kinase (CK) were measured. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 15.8% (95% CI: 8.9-18.2). The median age of patients with sarcopenia was 59.5 years (49.8-65.3), compared to 50 years (43-59 years) p = 0.001. The disease duration was also longer in patients with sarcopenia, 21 years (15-30), compared to those without sarcopenia, 13 years (7.3-20) p = 0.001. The inflammatory profile differed between patients with and without sarcopenia, revealing that the cytokines IL-1α, IL-6, and TNFß concentrations were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients with sarcopenia, adjusted for BMI, age, and disease duration. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA and sarcopenia were older and exhibited longer disease duration and higher levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to those without sarcopenia. These findings suggest potential implications for clinical outcomes. Key Points • The prevalence of sarcopenia in women with rheumatoid arthritis was 15.8% (95% CI, 8.9-18.2). • Levels of IL-1α, IL-6, and TNFß cytokines were significantly higher in women with rheumatoid arthritis and sarcopenia compared with those without sarcopenia, adjusted for BMI, age, and disease duration.

Humoral response to different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy data of the different types of available vaccines is still needed. The goal of the present analysis was to evaluate the humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccines in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. METHODS: Participants were included from February to September 2021. No prioritized vaccination roll call applied for OLT patients. Controls were otherwise healthy people. Blood samples were drawn after 15 days of the complete vaccine doses. The samples were analyzed according to the manufacturer's instructions using the Liaison XL platform from DiaSorin (DiaSorin S.p.A., Italy), and SARS-COV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA). RESULTS: A total of 187 participants (133 OLT, 54 controls, median age: 60 years, 58.8% women) were included for the analysis; 74.3% had at least one comorbidity. The serologic response in OLT patients was lower than in controls (median 549 AU/mL vs. 3450 AU/mL, respectively; p = 0.001). A positive humoral response was found in 133 OLT individuals: 89.2% with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), 60% ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), 76.9% with CoronaVac (Sinovac, Life Sciences, China), 55.6% Ad5-nCov (Cansino, Biologics), 68.2% Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) and 100% with mRNA-1273. In controls the serological response was 100%, except for Cansino (75%). In a multivariable model, personal history of COVID-19 and BNT162b2 inoculation were associated with the serologic response, while the use of prednisone (vs. other immunosuppressants) reduced this response. CONCLUSION: The serologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in OLT patients is lower than in healthy controls. The BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with a higher serologic response.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Rate in Patients With Cancer and Health Care Workers in a Chemoradiotherapy Unit During the Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort in Mexico.

PURPOSE: Cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic represents a challenge. Hospital visits to receive treatment and interaction with health care workers (HCW) represent potential contagious events. We aimed to determine SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among patients with cancer and HCW of a chemoradiotherapy unit localized in a center designated as a COVID-19 priority facility in Mexico City. We also determined the diagnostic performance of a clinical questionnaire (CQ) as a screening tool and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rate. METHODS: HCW and patients with solid tumors attending the chemoradiotherapy unit signed informed consent. To determine SARS-CoV-2 infection rate prospectively, a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed every 2 weeks in asymptomatics. An electronic CQ interrogating COVID-19-related symptoms was sent daily. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured at baseline and at the end of the study period. RESULTS: From June to September 2020, we included 130 asymptomatic participants, 44.6% HCW and 55.4% patients with cancer. During a median follow-up of 85 days, 634 nasopharyngeal swabs were performed. Average SARS-CoV-2 monthly incidence was 4.6% (3.15%-7.47%), and cumulative infection rate was 13.8% (18 of 130). Cases were mostly asymptomatic (66%), and no hospitalizations or deaths were recorded. The CQ as a screening tool provided a sensitivity of 27.7%, a positive predictive value of 26.3%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 12. SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion rate was 27.7% among those with a positive RT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer on treatment can have uncomplicated COVID-19 outcomes. Biweekly RT-qPCR testing detects asymptomatic infections, prevents transmission, and should be implemented in units to increase patient safety. CQ increase RT-qPCR diagnostic yield and may prioritize testing in resource-deprived settings. Post-infection IgG seroconversion is unreliable.