Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0241785, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33175899

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: After having an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), racial and ethnic minorities have less access to care, decreased rates of invasive treatments such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and worse outcomes compared with white patients. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid eligibility was associated with changes in racial disparities in access, treatments, and outcomes after AMI. METHODS: Quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences-in-differences analysis of non-Hispanic white and minority patients with acute myocardial infarction in California and Florida from 2010-2015, using linear regression models to estimate the difference-in-differences. This population-based sample included all Medicaid and uninsured patients ages 18-64 hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in California, which expanded Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act beginning as early as July 2011 in certain counties, and Florida, which did not expand Medicaid. The main outcomes included rates of admission to hospitals capable of performing PCI, rates of transfer for patients who first presented to hospitals that did not perform PCI, rates of PCI during hospitalization and rates of early (within 48 hours of admission) PCI, rates of readmission to the hospital within 30 days, and rates of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 55,991 hospital admissions met inclusion criteria, 32,540 of which were in California and 23,451 were in Florida. Among patients with AMI who initially presented to a non-PCI hospital, the likelihood of being transferred increased by 12 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 21) for minority patients relative to white patients after the Medicaid expansion. The likelihood of undergoing PCI increased by 3 percentage points (95% CI 0 to 5) for minority patients relative to white patients after the Medicaid expansion. We did not find an association between the Medicaid expansion and racial disparities in overall likelihood of admission to a PCI hospital, hospital readmissions, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in racial disparities in transfers and rates of PCI after AMI. We did not find an association between the Medicaid expansion and admission to a PCI hospital, readmissions, and in-hospital mortality. Additional factors outside of insurance coverage likely continue to contribute to disparities in outcomes after AMI. These findings are crucial for policy makers seeking to reduce racial disparities in access, treatment and outcomes in AMI.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Adult , California , Female , Florida , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , United States , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0232097, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324827

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Uninsured patients have decreased access to care, lower rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and worse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to determine whether expanding insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid eligibility affected access to PCI hospitals, rates of PCI, 30-day readmissions, and in-hospital mortality after AMI. METHODS: Quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences analysis of Medicaid and uninsured patients with acute myocardial infarction in California, which expanded Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act, and Florida, which did not, from 2010-2015. This study accounts for the early expansion of Medicaid in certain California counties that began as early as July 2011. Main outcomes included rates of admission to PCI hospitals, rates of transfer for patients who initially presented to non-PCI hospitals, rates of PCI, rates of early PCI defined as within 48 hours of hospital admission, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: 55,991 hospital admissions between 2010-2015 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 32,540 were in California, which expanded Medicaid, and 23,451 were in Florida, which did not. 30-day readmission rates after AMI decreased by an absolute difference of 1.22 percentage points after the Medicaid expansion (95% CI -2.14 to -0.30, P < 0.01). This represented a relative decrease in readmission rates of 9.5% after AMI. No relationship between the Medicaid expansion and admission to PCI hospitals, transfer to PCI hospitals, rates of PCI, rates of early PCI, or in-hospital mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmissions decreased by 9.5% after the Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility, although there was no association found between Medicaid expansion and access to PCI hospitals or treatment with PCI. Better understanding the ways that Medicaid expansion might affect care for vulnerable populations with AMI is important for policymakers considering whether to expand Medicaid eligibility in their state.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Adult , California , Case-Control Studies , Eligibility Determination , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicaid , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 54(4): 327-332, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567626

ABSTRACT

GOAL: We sought to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a treatment protocol for nausea and vomiting using the combination of chlorpromazine, a dopamine antagonist antiemetic, and ketamine, a nonopioid analgesic. BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with cannabis use disorder are presenting to emergency departments with a poorly understood syndrome characterized by intractable nausea and vomiting. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study involving a convenience sample of patients with unexplained nausea and vomiting. Subjects were given ketamine 15 mg slow intravenous push and chlorpromazine 12.5 mg intravenous over 15 minutes. Outcomes were number of episodes of emesis after study drug administration; change in nausea severity; change in pain severity; adverse events; and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: We enrolled 28 subjects on 30 emergency department visits. Twenty-three subjects (82%) reported at least weekly cannabis use with 19 reporting daily use. Initial symptoms were severe, with median pain and nausea scores both 10. After receiving study medication, the mean decrease in pain score over 120 minutes was 4.1 (95% confidence interval: 3.2, 5.0) and the mean decrease in nausea score was 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 4.0, 5.8). There were no adverse events. All 28 subjects who were asked reported they would want to receive these medications again. CONCLUSION: In this single-center study, the majority of patients presenting with intractable nausea and vomiting reported heavy cannabis use, and symptoms were severe. The combination of chlorpromazine plus ketamine resulted in rapid, definitive cessation of symptoms in most of these patients without the need for opioids or benzodiazepines.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic , Antiemetics , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...