Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Aesthet Surg J ; 38(4): 448-456, 2018 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29087444

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is common in many plastic surgery procedures, but few measures to prevent its occurrence are taken. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of hypothermia in patients undergoing plastic surgery procedures and the effect of utilizing simple and inexpensive measures to prevent patient hypothermia during surgery. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed among 3 groups of patients who underwent body contouring surgery for longer than 3.5 hours. In group 1, no protective measures were taken to prevent hypothermia; in group 2, maneuvers were applied intraoperatively for the duration of the entire surgical procedure; and in group 3, measures were taken preoperatively and intraoperatively. The results were quantified and analyzed through a bivariate analysis, including degree of hypothermia, anesthesia recovery time, time spent in the recovery area, intensity of pain, cold perception, response to opioids, and nausea. RESULTS: There were 122 patients included in the study: 43 in group 1, 39 in group 2, and 40 in group 3. All patients in group 1 had a higher degree of hypothermia, longer recovery time from anesthesia, longer overall recovery time, increased pain, increased feeling of cold, and more nausea. These patients also required a greater amount of opioids compared with the patients in groups 2 and 3. Many of the results were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of simple and inexpensive measures before and during plastic surgery can prevent patient hypothermia during the procedures, leading to a shorter anesthesia recovery time and avoiding the undesirable effects associated with hypothermia. In addition, these measures may have significant economic savings.


Subject(s)
Body Contouring/adverse effects , Hypothermia/prevention & control , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Adult , Body Temperature Regulation , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hypothermia/epidemiology , Hypothermia/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Rev. colomb. anestesiol ; 45(1): 48-53, Jan.-June 2017.
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-900332

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Hypothermia is perhaps the most frequent undesirable event in elective surgery. It is estimated that 1 h after surgery has initiated 70-90% of patients will experience hypothermia. In elective surgery, there are several factors leading to temperatures under 34 °C. Hypothermia may increases infections, bleeding and need for transfusion as well as the occurrence of an undesirable effect of discomfort and feared such as cold and postoperative shivering that can lead to cardiac complications due to increased of sympathetic influence. Objectives: Review the causes of these low temperatures within intraoperative elective surgery and check if the current alternatives to prevent hypothermia are effective. Methods: Review of non-systematic literature in PubMed and Medline was performed. Results: Hypothermia is the most common and least diagnosed undesirable event of patients undergoing surgery although it is easy to detect and preventive measures do not present major difficulties in their implementation. Conclusions: There are effective measures easy to set up, economical and effective to prevent hypothermia; the most important is the patient warm with hot air under pressure for 1 h and maintenance of air conditioning in the room above 22 °C. We just need to understand these measures and start to implement them.


Resumen Introducción: La hipotermia es tal vez el evento indeseable mas frecuente en los pacientes que van a cirugía programada. Se considera que 1 hora después de iniciada la cirugía el 70 al 90% de los pacientes se encuentran hipotérmicos. En cirugía Electiva en pacientes sanos hay varios factores que llevan a que nuestros pacientes mantengan cifras de temperaturas de 34 °C e inclusive menores. El problema está en que la hipotermia aumenta las infecciones, el sangrado y la necesidad de trasfusión, la aparición de un efecto indeseable y temido por el paciente como es el frío y temblor postoperatorio que puede llevar a complicaciones cardiacas debido al aumento del influjo simpático. Objetivos: Revisarlas causas que llevan a estas bajas temperaturas intraoperatorias en cirugía programada y revisar si las opciones que tenemos hoy en día para prevenir la hipotermia pueden ser efectivas. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura no sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed y Medline. Resultados: La hipotermia es el evento indeseable más frecuente y menos diagnosticado en el paciente que va a cirugía a pesar que es fácil de detectar y las medidas preventivas son relativamente fáciles de instaurar. Conclusiones: Hay medidas efectivas, fáciles de instaurar, económicas y efectivas para evitar la hipotermia y entre ellas la más importante es el precalentamiento del paciente con aire caliente a presión por 1 hora, el mantenimiento del aire acondicionado de la sala por encima de 22 grados centígrados. Solo necesitamos entender cuales son estas medidas e iniciar a ponerlas en practica.


Subject(s)
Humans
4.
Anesth Analg ; 119(2): 276-285, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25046785

ABSTRACT

The increasing volume of office-based medical and surgical procedures has fostered the emergence of office-based anesthesia (OBA), a subspecialty within ambulatory anesthesia. The growth of OBA has been facilitated by numerous trends, including innovations in medical and surgical procedures and anesthetic drugs, as well as improved provider reimbursement and greater convenience for patients. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials to determine how office-based procedures and anesthesia affect patient morbidity and mortality. As a result, studies on this topic are retrospective in nature. Some of the early literature broaches concerns about the safety of office-based procedures and anesthesia. However, more recent data have shown that care in ambulatory settings is comparable to hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers, especially when offices are accredited and their proceduralists are board-certified. Office-based suites can continue to enhance the quality of care that they deliver to patients by engaging in proper procedure and patient selection, provider credentialing, facility accreditation, and incorporating patient safety checklists and professional society guidelines into practice. These strategies aiming at patient morbidity and mortality in the office setting will be increasingly important as more states, and possibly the federal government, exercise regulatory authority over the ambulatory setting. We explore these trends, their implications for patient safety, strategies for minimizing patient complications and mortality in OBA, and future developments that could impact the field.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia/methods , Accreditation , Ambulatory Care/standards , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/mortality , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/standards , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/mortality , Anesthesia/standards , Certification , Humans , Patient Safety , Patient Selection , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Anesth Analg ; 114(1): 94-100, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22052978

ABSTRACT

CLINICAL PROBLEM: Volatile anesthetics and/or succinylcholine may trigger a potentially lethal malignant hyperthermia (MH) event requiring critical care crisis management. If the MH triggering anesthetic is given in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC), then the patient will need to be transferred to a receiving hospital. Before May 2010, there was no clinical guide regarding the development of a specific transfer plan for MH patients in an ASC. MECHANISM BY WHICH THE STATEMENT WAS GENERATED: A consensual process lasting 18 months among 13 representatives of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States, the Ambulatory Surgery Foundation, the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians led to the creation of this guide. EVIDENCE FOR THE STATEMENT: Most of the guide is based on the clinical experience and scientific expertise of the 13 representatives. The list of representatives appears in Appendix 1. The recommendation that IV dantrolene should be initiated pending transfer is also supported by clinical research demonstrating that the likelihood of significant MH complications doubles for every 30-minute delay in dantrolene administration (Anesth Analg 2010;110:498-507). STATEMENT: This guide includes a list of potential clinical problems and therapeutic interventions to assist each ASC in the development of its own unique MH transfer plan. Points to consider include receiving health care facility capabilities, indicators of patient stability and necessary report data, transport team considerations and capabilities, implementation of transfer decisions, and coordination of communication among the ASC, the receiving hospital, and the transport team. See Appendix 2 for the guide.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Guidelines as Topic , Hospitals/standards , Malignant Hyperthermia/therapy , Patient Transfer/standards , Dantrolene/administration & dosage , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Malignant Hyperthermia/diagnosis , Malignant Hyperthermia/etiology , Muscle Relaxants, Central/administration & dosage , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...