Rhinomanometry with and without decongestant used to select children for adenoidectomy: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Adenoid hypertrophy may coexist, and often does, with rhinitis. Therefore, in some cases, adenoidectomy alone, despite the fact that it reduces nasal resistance, may be insufficient to restore nasal breathing. Juliusson et al. suggested using rhinomanometry with and without nasal decongestant as a method for selecting patients for adenoidectomy. In this study, we aim to assess whether the decongestant test, when using normative data, is useful to select children for adenoidectomy. METHODS: Children between 4 and 15 years old undergoing adenoidectomy were selected from two tertiary referral university hospitals. Participants underwent anterior active rhinomanometry with and without nasal decongestant before and after surgery. Parents fill in the sinus and nasal quality-of-life survey (SN5). RESULTS: 47 participants were included, and mean age 6.5 ± 2.15. 2 cohorts were defined according to the result of the nasal decongestant test (> 40% improvement in nasal resistance or not). There is a statistically significant difference between groups, with a higher improvement in nasal resistance and airflow after adenoidectomy in the group with less than 40% improvement in nasal resistance. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study supports the use of the decongestant test with rhinomanometry to select children for adenoidectomy; especially as it has proven to be a simple technique, harmless, fast, and easily performed on collaborative children.

What is the relationship between the size of the adenoids and nasal obstruction? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: adenoidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedure in pediatric otolaryngology practice. Clinical guidelines (such as the Spanish or American) suggest adenoidectomy when the enlargement of the adenoids is associated with nasal obstruction. Nasal endoscopy and cephalograms are adequate methods to estimate the size of the adenoids. However, they do not measure nasal patency. This systematic review is designed with the objective of exploring the relationship between adenoid size and nasal ventilation through rhinomanometry. REVIEW METHODS: 3 authors members of the YO-IFOS rhinology study group independently analyzed the data sources (Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SciELO) for papers assessing both nasal resistance and/or nasal airflow in rhinomanometry and adenoid size by any method (endoscopy, cephalogram, direct examination). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with a total population of 969 participants met the inclusion criteria. 5 authors explored the size of the adenoids through endoscopy. 4 authors explored the adenoids through lateral cephalograms. Finally, a further 2 authors explored adenoid size studying the resected tissue. Five studies explored the correlation between adenoid size and nasal resistance in rhinomanometry, which ranged from 0.20 to 0.84. Finally, 5 studies used nasal decongestant. It was found higher sensitivity and specificity, a higher area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve, and higher correlation with adenoid size for rhinomanometry under nasal decongestion. CONCLUSION: Up to now, there is no ideal diagnostic method for adenoid hypertrophy. Therefore, it seems prudent to use a combination of all currently available tools, as they provide complementary, rather than supplementary information. Available evidence suggests that rhinomanometry combined with nasal decongestant could help to elucidate the existence of nasal obstruction in intermediate cases of adenoid hypertrophy, as well as throw light on other possible causes for nasal obstruction, mainly turbinate hypertrophy.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the sinus and nasal quality of life survey (SN-5) to Spanish.

OBJECTIVE: There is a high prevalence for rhinitis with an increasing trend. However, there is a lack of specific quality of life pediatric questionnaires for sinonasal symptoms. The Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey (SN-5) is the only validated instrument specifically designed with this objective. In this work we have translated and validated the Spanish version of the SN5 questionnaire. METHODS: The SN5 was translated according to the World Health Organization recommendation for the translation and adaptation of instruments. The final version of the Sp-SN5 was administered twice (day 0 and day 7) to 137 participants with and without sinonasal symptoms. Reliability was measured with Cronbach α, temporal stability was measured with intraclass correlation coefficient. External validity was assessed with a ROC curve comparing a cohort of cases (children going to turbinate radiofrequency ablation) and controls (asymptomatic children). RESULTS: A Spearman correlation between the total result of the Sp-SN-5 questionnaire and the QOL score showed a strong negative correlation in the general sample and all the age subgroups. Internal consistency measured with Cronbach α was 0.87 for 5 items and was still over 0.83 after removing each item of the test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest measurements was 0.94. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for all the included participants showed a very high area under the curve (0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The Sp-SN-5 questionnaire was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Spanish, and the translated version exhibited adequate properties. The survey was effective in assessing the quality of life of pediatric patients with sinonasal complaints and can be used for this purpose both in a clinical setting and in future research.