Preoperative volume prediction in adult live donor liver transplantation: 3-D CT volumetry approach to prevent miscalculations.

BACKGROUND: The precise preoperative calculation of functional liver volumes for both donor and recipient is a crucial part of the evaluation process in adult living donor liver transplantation. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate our modus 3-D CT volumetry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Native (unenhanced), arterial, and venous phase CT images from 62 consecutive live liver donors were subjected to 3-D CT liver volume calculations and virtual 3-D liver partitioning. Graft-volume estimates based on our modus 3-D volumetry, which subtracted intrahepatic vascular volume from the "smallest" (native) unenhanced CT phase, were subsequently compared to the intraoperative graft-weights obtained in all 62 cases. Calculated (preoperative) liver-volume-body-weight-ratios and measured (intraoperative) liver-weight-body-weight-ratios of liver grafts were analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative calculations of graft-volume according to our modus 3-D CT volumetry did not yield statistically significant over- or under-estimations when compared to the intraoperative findings independent of their age or gender. CONCLUSION: Our modus 3-D volumetry, when based on the "smallest" (native) unenhanced CT phase, accurately accounted for intrahepatic vascular volumes and offered a precise virtual model of individualized operative conditions for each potential live liver donor.

Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: how much can we rely on it?

Accurate preoperative prediction of functional donor and remnant hemiliver volumes in live donor liver transplantation is essential in preventing postoperative liver failure and optimizing safety. Our aim was (1) to evaluate volume variability associated with multiphasic CT imaging and (2) to determine over- or under-estimations of 3-D CT graft-volume assessments based on 'largest' versus 'smallest' CT phases with respect to intraoperative findings. Native, arterial and venous phase CT images from 83 potential live liver donors were subject to 3-D CT liver volume calculations and virtual 3-D liver partitioning. Estimates were compared to intraoperative volumes obtained in 43 cases. Calculated (preoperative) graft-volume-body-weight-ratios (GVBWR) versus measured (intraoperative) graft-weight-body-weight-ratios (GWBWR) were analyzed. Significant differences in total liver volume- and in graft-liver volume calculations were found among the largest (venous) and smallest (native) CT phases. High significant overestimations were observed in graft-volume determinations and in GVBWR-calculations based on the 'largest' CT phase when compared to intraoperatively obtained graft-weight and -GWBWR values. In contrast, differences among intraoperative measurements and preoperative calculations based on the 'smallest' CT phase yielded less significant overestimations. While 3-D CT volumetry based on the 'largest' (venous) CT phase is associated with considerable overestimation, 3-D volumetry based on the 'smallest' (native) CT phase accurately matches the intraoperative findings.

Computer-assisted operative planning in adult living donor liver transplantation: a new way to resolve the dilemma of the middle hepatic vein.

An adequate venous outflow is essential for securing viability of both graft and remnant in adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Seventy-five potential live liver donors were evaluated for LDLT by means of an "all-in-one" CT, which defined the biliary tree, portal vein, hepatic artery, and hepatic vein anatomy. The acquired data sets were further analysed by means of the software HepaVision (MeVis, Germany). Only a minority (29%) of potential donors were found to have a vascular and biliary anatomy consistent with the classically described "normal" patterns. The vast majority (71%) had "anatomical variations". Thirty-nine (52%) donors underwent ALDLT hepatectomy. The right hepatic vein was dominant in 64 cases, representing 48 +/- 6% of the total liver volume (TLV). The middle hepatic vein was dominant in 11 cases, making up 40 +/- 8% of the TLV. The left hepatic vein was never dominant. The volume contribution of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) was 114-782 ml for the right and 87-419 ml for the left hemiliver. Computer-assisted planning allows for the 3D reconstruction of the vascular and biliary anatomy, automatic calculation of the total and territorial liver volumes, and risk analysis of hepatic vein dominance relationships. This comprehensive data acquisition supports preoperative evaluation and provides a high degree of safety for donors and improved outcomes for recipients.

The influence of accessory right inferior hepatic veins on the venous drainage in right graft living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proper venous outflow reconstruction is essential for the success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). It has also a decisive impact on postoperative graft dysfunction. The accessory right inferior hepatic veins (IHVs) usually drain parts of the lateral sector of the right hemiliver graft (RHL). The purpose of our study was to: (1) evaluate the drainage patterns of the IHVs in right hemiliver grafts; (2) analyze the influence of IHVs on the dominance relationships between the right and middle hepatic veins in RHL's; (3) evaluate some potential correlation between drainage patterns of IHVs and the portal vein anatomy. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed 3-dimensional CT-imaging reconstructions of 71 potential live liver donors evaluated at our Institution between January 2003 and October 2004. RESULTS: (1) Thirty-six (51%) donors had inferior hepatic veins (IHV) with detectable venous drainage territories, (2) the RHV/IHV-complex was dominant in 97% of cases, and the RHV as a single veinwithout anatomical IHV was dominant in 94% of right hemiliver grafts, (3) 27 of 71 livers (38%) showed a central (n=11) or peripheral (n=16) PV anomaly, (4) IHV provided a mean 32% of venous drainage in the right lateral sector, and in some cases drained up to 25% of the right medial sector irrespective of the PV anatomy, (5) such cases required IHV reconstruction to prevent severe tissue congestion in the right hemiliver graft. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate insight into the drainage patterns of the right and middle hepatic veins and precise knowledge of the functional volume drained by the IHV are essential when planning for the proper outflow reconstruction of right hemiliver grafts in LDLT.

Target range maximum of cyclosporine blood concentration two hours post dose in stable liver transplant patients.

Recently, single blood level measurement 2 hours after cyclosporine administration (C2) is taken as a more sensitive indicator of drug exposure in de novo transplant recipients than trough levels (C0). However, few studies focused on the determination of the C2 target range maximum and its associated adverse events in stable liver recipients. This prospective study was designed to assess the relative risk of developing CsA related side effects in patients with high C2-levels. Adverse effects were determined clinically, and by using a specially designed questionnaire. Eventual adverse events as well as C2 levels were determined repeatedly up to 4 times in 3-months intervals (observation period 9 +/- 3 months) in 36 long-term liver recipients (1-13.5 years post-transplant), in addition to conventional C0 levels. Cyclosporine dose was adjusted according to a predefined C0 target level range and clinical status. Totally 103 questionnaires and the corresponding paired CsA blood level records were obtained. C0 levels and C2 levels ranged from 90 to 287 (143 +/- 31) ng/ml and from 212 to 1358 (672 +/- 203) ng/ml respectively. No patient experienced a rejection episode during the observation period, demonstrating the efficiency of the immunosuppressive therapy. However, 33/36 patients (91%) showed symptoms attributable to CsA therapy. C2 levels above 750 ng/ml, determined at least twice in an interval of 3 months, were identified as a relevant risk factor for the presence of multiple adverse effects, which were defined as the combination of hypertension, renal insufficiency and more than two neurological complaints (RR = 3.11, p<0.01). This risk population was not completely identified by determination of C0 level.

The "territorial belonging" of the middle hepatic vein: a troublesome dilemma in adult live donor liver transplantation--anatomical evidence based on virtual 3-dimensional-computed tomography-imaging reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: The venous drainage of the liver plays an essential role in securing viability of both graft and remnant in live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). There is still controversy on whether the middle hepatic vein (MHV) should be routinely included as part of the graft or retained with the remnant liver. The purpose of this study was to analyze hepatic venous drainage patterns based on information obtained by 3-dimensional CT-imaging reconstructions. METHODOLOGY: Fifty five potential live liver donors were evaluated between January 2003 and May 2004 at our Institution. We analyzed two anatomical definitions of liver dominance: total liver dominance (TLD) and hemiliver dominance (HLD). The following concepts were addressed: 1) Hepatic vein territories, 2) Hepatic vein dominance relationship, 3) Territorial belonging- patterns of the MHV to the right and left hemilivers, additionally an analysis of venous outflow in the central liver sectors was performed. RESULTS: Our results showed that: 1) The definitions of dominance: TLD vs. HLD overlap, displaying the MHV belonging, by taking into account the individual right hepatic vein (RHV) variability; 2) A dominant RHV for the whole liver indicates that the RHV is also dominant in the right hemiliver; 3) The MHV belongs predominantly to the left hemiliver (LHL); 4) The left hepatic vein (LHV) is dominant in the LHL. CONCLUSION: Both dominance definitions provide independent mappings of the liver and offer helpful insight into venous dominance relationship.

Living donor liver transplantation.

The introduction of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been one of the most remarkable steps in the field of liver transplantation (LT). First introduced for children in 1989, its adoption for adults has followed only 10 years later. As the demand for LT continues to increase, LDLT provides life-saving therapy for many patients who would otherwise die awaiting a cadaveric organ. In recent years, LDLT has been shown to be a clinically safe addition to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and has been able to significantly extend the scarce donor pool. As long as the donor shortage continues to increase, LDLT will play an important role in the future of LT.

[Living organ donor transplantation--the German experience in comparison to others]. / Leberlebendspende. Die deutsche Erfahrung im internationalen Vergleich.

Living liver donation is a prominent and innovative method in the therapy of terminal liver disease in children and adults. Live donation of livers was first used in 1989 for children. After only 10 years, the concept was also established for application in adults. Due to the imminent lack of donor organs and the constantly increasing need of liver transplantation, this method will continue to grow in importance.

Biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation using the right liver lobe: techniques and complications.

Since the introduction of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe of the liver, biliary problems have led the list of complications resulting in postoperative morbidity. We report our experience with the first 30 living donor liver transplantations performed in our institution from August 1998 to January 2000. Patients were 21 men and 9 women, with a mean age 45 +/- 16 years. Mean recipient weight was 65.1 +/- 17.9 kg, mean graft weight was 877 +/- 146 g, and the mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.5 +/- 0.6. Patient and graft survival rates were 83.3% and 80%, respectively. Biliary anastomosis was either an end-to-end hepaticocholedochostomy with a T-drain or hepaticojejunostomy. Mean follow-up was 217.4 +/- 149.8 days. The overall complication rate was 26.6% (8 of 30 procedures) and was directly correlated to the type of anastomosis and number of bile ducts. Surgical revision was necessary in all cases. Biliary complications were not the primary cause of graft loss. Adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe is a successful procedure, with graft and patient survival similar to those in cadaver full-organ transplantation. Postoperative morbidity, mainly caused by biliary leak, was directly related to the number of ducts and type of anastomosis. With increasing experience, we have better defined our plane of transection on the hilar plate, with the goal of obtaining only 1 biliary duct for the anastomosis. We also improved our parenchymal transection technique, which resulted in a decreased incidence of leak at the cut-surface area.

Living donor liver transplantation in adults: outcome in Europe.

1. Eleven European centers have performed 228 living donor liver transplants (LDLT): 105 in children and 123 in adults. 2. Right lobe donation was used in 111 of 123 adult cases (90%). 3. There was 1 donor death ( approximately 0.8%), and 17.8% of donors experienced significant complications. 4. Eighty-six percent of recipients and 83% of grafts survived. Biliary complications occurred in 14.6%.

[Aneurysms of the splenic artery in patients with liver transplantation]. / Aneurismas de la arteria esplénica en pacientes con trasplante hepático.

Splenic artery aneurysms (SAA) are not uncommon in patients with hepatic transplant (HT). Three in 150 transplanted patients in our institutions were diagnosed with SAA and two of them had a spontaneous rupture. In two patients embolization with interventionist radiology was performed with excellent results. SAA should be investigated before and after HT and be treated with embolization as soon as possible because of the high risk of rupture.