Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Acta Biomed ; 94(S3): e2023123, 2023 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rolling reviews have been widely used by the scientific community during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide guidelines and identify potential treatments in such a quickly evolving emergency. Throughout the two pandemic years, we provided independent and continuously updated (rolling) e-learning courses on COVID-19 targeted to Italian healthcare professionals with the aim of increasing dissemination based on the emerging evidence. The results of this project are presented in this brief report. METHODS: We launched five main courses on COVID-19 - with focus on treatments and vaccines - from February 2020 to December 2022. For each course, we collected and analised participation data and, via questionnaires, customer-satisfaction data on relevance, quality, efficacy and sponsor perception. RESULTS: From 22 February 2020 to 31 December 2022, a total of 224,459 enrollments were registered over the five courses with 192,966 passes (86%), for which Continuing Medical Education (CME) credits were awarded. Over 94% of participants considered the contents of high quality, relevant and effective for their educational needs. The absence of sponsorship perception, 83% overall, decreased relevantly for the two courses on COVID-19 vaccines (68.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Italian healthcare professionals working during the pandemic overwhelmingly appreciated and valued the rolling e-learning offer aimed at widening the dissemination of the best practices on COVID-19. This educational model provides independent, evidence-based and tailored information with the undoubted advantages of time flexibility, remote participation and continuous update, all elements that make it a useful tool in a pandemic as well as in a post-pandemic era.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19 Vaccines , Models, Educational , Delivery of Health Care
3.
J Contin Educ Health Prof ; 40(4): 289-292, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284182

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Distance learning efficacy on physician performances and patient health outcomes has been demonstrated. This study explored the participation and evaluation of CME e-learning courses for Italian health care professionals addressing leading causes of maternal mortality identified by the Italian Obstetric Surveillance System (ItOSS) at the Italian National Health Institute, namely postpartum hemorrhage and pregnancy hypertensive disorders. METHODS: A model for two online free 12-hour case-based training courses was used. Data on participants were collected, anonymized, and transferred to the Italian National Health Institute for later analysis. Participants were requested to sign an online informed consent form. RESULTS: Twenty-one thousand five hundred thirty-two health care professionals enrolled to the courses from 2014 to 2017 as follows: midwives (14,187, 65.9%); obstetricians (3,716, 17.2%); anesthesiologists (1,896, 8.8%); and other medical specialists (1,733, 8.0%). Overall, 85% of participants acquired CME credits. Participants' satisfaction on quality, efficacy, and relevance was very high. DISCUSSION: ItOSS courses were able to reach a substantial number of different professional profiles involved in perinatal care all over the country; ItOSS courses can be considered an effective way to spread evidence-based good clinical practices. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to verify the improvement in professional health care skills and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Education, Distance/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Obstetrics/education , Adult , Education, Distance/methods , Education, Distance/trends , Female , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Italy , Male , Maternal Health Services/trends , Middle Aged , Obstetrics/methods
4.
Med Lav ; 108(1): 24-32, 2017 02 15.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on individual risk factors for chronic diseases (smoking, physical activity, body mass) are collected by company physicians in heterogeneous ways. This makes comparisons, researches and evaluations difficult. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to find a consensus on evaluation tools for chronic diseases risk factors and for health promotion programs in workplaces that could be performed by company physicians during their clinical activity. METHODS: A first set of tools, proposed by a working group of occupational physicians in Bergamo, was submitted through the Delphi technique to a national expert panel of 22 persons including recognized national experts in specific fields and occupational physicians skilled in health promotion. RESULTS: In three Delphi rounds, the panel selected a set of tools to monitor the main individual risk factors for chronic diseases (smoking, alcohol, physical activity, nutrition, stress and mental health) as well as general data related to the worker and his job. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these specific tools, collected in a homogeneous format, should be recommended to all Italian company physicians, in particular those who work in WHP-programs, in order to allow analysis, comparison and evaluation of health promotion programs effectiveness at a national level.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Delphi Technique , Occupational Health , Occupational Medicine , Humans , Risk Factors
5.
Trials ; 17: 19, 2016 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26758509

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ECRAN (European Communication on Research Awareness Needs) project was initiated in 2012, with support from the European Commission, to improve public knowledge about the importance of independent, multinational, clinical trials in Europe. METHODS: Participants in the ECRAN consortium included clinicians and methodologists directly involved in clinical trials; researchers working in partnership with the public and patients; representatives of patients; and experts in science communication. We searched for, and evaluated, relevant existing materials and developed additional materials and tools, making them freely available under a Creative Commons licence. RESULTS: The principal communication materials developed were: 1. A website ( http://ecranproject.eu ) in six languages, including a Media centre section to help journalists to disseminate information about the ECRAN project 2. An animated film about clinical trials, dubbed in the 23 official languages of the European Community, and an interactive tutorial 3. An inventory of resources, available in 23 languages, searchable by topic, author, and media type 4. Two educational games for young people, developed in six languages 5. Testing Treatments interactive in a dozen languages, including five official European Community languages 6. An interactive tutorial slide presentation testing viewers' knowledge about clinical trials CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year project, our multidisciplinary and multinational consortium was able to produce, and make freely available in many languages, new materials to promote public knowledge about the importance of independent and international clinical trials. Sustained funding for the ECRAN information platform could help to promote successful recruitment to independent clinical trials supported through the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Clinical Trials as Topic , Communication , Language , Awareness , Europe , Health Literacy , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...