ABSTRACT
AIMS: The terms "patient activation" and "patient empowerment" are used to describe the extent to which individuals are able to manage their own healthcare. Health outcomes and quality of life improve in patients who are more active in health care. The aim of this study was to identify sociodemographic, clinical, sociological and psychological determinants associated with activation in a group of chronically anticoagulated patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients treated with oral antivitamin-k drugs attended at a specialized outpatient anticoagulant unit between November 2021 and June 2022. The main dependent variable was the level of patient activation according to the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13). Simple and multiple linear regression models were conducted to identify the determinants associated with PAM-13 score. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients who met all the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. The mean age was 59.6 years (SD 13.8; range 22-86) and 60.6% were male. Sixty per cent presented a level IV of activation according to the PAM-13 scale. Mean patient activation score was 73.9 (SD 15.4). The factors independently associated with significantly lower activation were: emergency department visits in the past 12 months, intermediate social risk, anxiety symptoms, stress symptoms and low self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Five determinants were found to be associated with activation. Knowing the factors that modify the level of activation can help to identify subgroups of chronic anticoagulated patients who are less likely to engage in self-management and are therefore candidates for tailored educational interventions.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Aged , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Administration, Oral , Patient Participation , Young Adult , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia de un programa de autocontrol en pacientes con tratamiento anticoagulante oral (TAO) en el mantenimiento del nivel ratio internacional normalizada (INR) en rango terapéutico vs. el método tradicional realizado antes de la intervención, así como las complicaciones, la calidad de vida y el tiempo invertido en los controles. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio piloto de factibilidad con medidas pre-post. Se incluyó a 15 pacientes mayores de 18 años que acudían al control desde hacía más de 6meses. En la fase pre, el paciente realizaba los controles y el seguimiento desde la consulta hospitalaria. Tras realizar una intervención educativa individual al paciente para capacitarlo en la punción, el uso del coagulómetro, el manejo de las tablas de dosificación y el posterior seguimiento desde la consulta virtual, se comparó el porcentaje de controles de INR en rango, las complicaciones, la calidad de vida, y el tiempo invertido para realizar los controles pre (tradicional) y postintervención (autocontrol). RESULTADOS: El porcentaje de controles de INR en rango terapéutico en la fase post fue significativamente mayor que en la pre (65,6% vs. 37,8% p < 0,001). Las complicaciones leves, como las complicaciones graves, disminuyeron en la fase post (20% vs. 0% y 6,7% vs. 0%). Mejoraron significativamente las 5dimensiones del cuestionario de calidad de vida y disminuyó el tiempo invertido. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra experiencia el autocontrol del TAO sugiere una mejora significativa en el control de pacientes, una disminución de las complicaciones, una mejora en la calidad de vida y un ahorro de tiempo
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a self-monitoring programme vs. the conventional method used before the intervention in maintaining the international normalised ratio (INR) in the therapeutic range in patients receiving oral anticoagulants, as well as complications, quality of life and the time invested in the tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-pospilot and feasibility study. The study included 15 patients over the age of 18 years who had been attending the monitoring programme for more than 6months. In the pre phase, patients performed the tests and follow-up in the outpatient clinic. After conducting an individual training session with each patient to teach them how to perform venipuncture, use the coagulometer, manage dosing tables and subsequent follow-up from the virtual clinic, we compared the percentage of in-range INR tests, complications, quality of life, and the time invested in performing the tests pre-(conventional) and post-intervention (intervention for self-monitoring). RESULTS: The percentage of INR tests in the therapeutic range was significantly higher in the post-phase than in the pre-phase (65.6% vs. 37.8%, p<.001). Likewise, the incidence of both minor and serious complications decreased in the post-phase (20% vs. 0%, and 6.7% vs. 0%, respectively). Finally, all 5dimensions of the quality of life questionnaire improved significantly, while the time invested decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, OAT self-monitoring is associated with a significant improvement in patient management, a reduction in the rate of complications, improved quality of life and timesaving
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Feasibility Studies , Quality of Life , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Self Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Patient Education as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a self-monitoring programme vs. the conventional method used before the intervention in maintaining the international normalised ratio (INR) in the therapeutic range in patients receiving oral anticoagulants, as well as complications, quality of life and the time invested in the tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pre-pospilot and feasibility study. The study included 15 patients over the age of 18 years who had been attending the monitoring programme for more than 6months. In the pre phase, patients performed the tests and follow-up in the outpatient clinic. After conducting an individual training session with each patient to teach them how to perform venipuncture, use the coagulometer, manage dosing tables and subsequent follow-up from the virtual clinic, we compared the percentage of in-range INR tests, complications, quality of life, and the time invested in performing the tests pre- (conventional) and post-intervention (intervention for self-monitoring). RESULTS: The percentage of INR tests in the therapeutic range was significantly higher in the post-phase than in the pre-phase (65.6% vs. 37.8%, p<.001). Likewise, the incidence of both minor and serious complications decreased in the post-phase (20% vs. 0%, and 6.7% vs. 0%, respectively). Finally, all 5dimensions of the quality of life questionnaire improved significantly, while the time invested decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, OAT self-monitoring is associated with a significant improvement in patient management, a reduction in the rate of complications, improved quality of life and timesaving.
