Ixazomib With or Without Rituximab Following Maintenance Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Phase I Trial.

BACKGROUND: Induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard first-line treatment for fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We conducted a single-center phase I trial investigating post-transplant maintenance with ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor. METHODS: Patients enrolled between days +70 and +180 post ASCT. Patients received ixazomib per dose cohort on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 10 cycles. During recruitment, published phase III data reported a survival benefit with rituximab maintenance, so all subsequent patients received ixazomib 4 mg at the same schedule along with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9. All patients were in complete remission at enrollment. RESULTS: Seven patients received ixazomib monotherapy; 1 dose limiting toxicity (grade 3 neutropenia) occurred at dose level 2 (4 mg). Five patients received combination Ixazomib plus rituximab, with 2 experiencing DLTs (both Grade 4 neutropenia). Grade 3-4 neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 57%, 8%, and 8% of patients, respectively. Non-hematologic adverse events (AE) included nausea (42%), peripheral neuropathy (42%), and abdominal discomfort (33%), all of which were grade 1 or 2 in severity. There were no infectious AEs. With a median follow up of 46 months, all patients are alive and in complete remission. CONCLUSION: The trial was closed to further accrual due to high rates of treatment-related myelosuppression. The current dose and schedule of ixazomib, especially when combined with rituximab, results in unacceptable hematologic toxicity when administered as post-transplant maintenance in MCL. Ixazomib maintenance micro abstract: The authors conducted a phase I study investigating the use of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, with or without rituximab in patients with mantle cell lymphoma in first remission following chemoimmunotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. All patients treated on study remain in complete remission with a median follow-up of 46 months, but the study was closed early due to a high rate of hematologic adverse events.

Safety and survival outcomes for bloodless transplantation in patients with myeloma.

High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are established components in the treatment of multiple myeloma; however, undergoing transplantation usually requires hematopoietic support, which poses a challenge among patients who are unwilling to receive blood products. Most transplant centers decline HDT/ASCT to these patients because of safety concerns. Here, the authors' institutional data on safety, engraftment parameters, and survival outcomes after bloodless ASCT (BL-ASCT) are examined among patients with myeloma. This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent BL-ASCT and Transfusion-supported ASCT (TS-ASCT) at Emory University Hospital between August 2006 and August 2016. In total, 24 patients who underwent BL-ASCT and 70 who underwent TS-ASCT were included. The median time for neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment and the median length of hospital stay all were equivalent for both groups. There were no transplant-related cardiovascular complications or mortality in either the BL-ASCT group or the TS-ASCT group. The median progression-free survival was 36 months and 44 months in the BL-ASCT and TS-ASCT groups, respectively (P = .277), and the median OS was not reached in either group at a median follow-up of 59 months after ASCT (P = .627). There was no transplant-related mortality at the 100-day or 1-year mark in either group. BL-ASCT is safe and feasible; transplant-related mortality, cardiovascular and hematologic complications are similar to those associated with TS-ASCT. Furthermore, BL-ASCT can yield similar engraftment and survival parameters comparable to those observed with TS-ASCT.

Intrathecal Central Nervous System Prophylaxis in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma at an Academic Healthcare System.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal chemoprophylaxis is often administered to patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to lower the rates of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, although its benefit has not been well-described. Prognostic models, including the CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), have been developed to aid in identifying patients at highest risk for CNS relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 112 patients diagnosed with DLBCL from 2009 to 2016 at Emory Healthcare and classified them as high (n = 44) or low risk (n = 68) for CNS relapse and compared CNS prophylaxis rates and relapse rates between groups. The primary outcome was to compare the CNS relapse rate in high-risk patients who received intrathecal prophylaxis with patients who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (14 high-risk and 12 low-risk) received intrathecal prophylaxis. Only 4 of 112 patients experienced a CNS relapse, including 1 in the high-risk group and 3 in the low-risk group. Among 14 high-risk patients who received intrathecal prophylaxis, no patient experienced CNS relapse compared with 1 of 30 high-risk patients without prophylaxis (P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Given the low rates of CNS relapse in this series, it is difficult to discern the impact of current risk stratification combined with intrathecal prophylaxis on outcomes. Our observation that many high-risk patients did not receive prophylaxis, whereas many low-risk patients received prophylaxis emphasizes the need for a standardized approach.

How to Decide Which DLBCL Patients Should Receive CNS Prophylaxis.

Secondary central nervous system (CNS) relapse in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a dismal diagnosis with poor outcomes. While prophylaxis against secondary CNS disease is recommended in patients with highly aggressive NHLs, such as Burkitt lymphoma, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) present a challenging clinical dilemma due to an inherently lower risk of CNS relapse. Current guidelines suggest that prophylaxis may benefit DLBCL patients at high risk for CNS relapse; however, it has been difficult to define which patients are truly at high risk. Many studies have attempted to clarify the issue, with conflicting results. Here we review current prognostic models, risk factors, and prophylaxis methods to provide a practical approach to preventing CNS relapse in patients with DLBCL.

Targeting the B cell receptor pathway in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Dysregulated B cell receptor (BCR) signaling has been identified as a potent contributor to tumor survival in B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). This pathway's emergence as a rational therapeutic target in NHL led to development of BCR-directed agents, including inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K). Several drugs have become valuable assets in the anti-lymphoma armamentarium. AREAS COVERED: We provide an overview of the BCR pathway, its dysregulation in B cell NHL, and the drugs developed to target BCR signaling in lymphoma. Mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity of currently available BTK, SYK, and PI3K inhibitors are described. EXPERT OPINION: While the excellent response rates and favorable toxicity profile of the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in certain NHL subtypes have propelled it to consideration as frontline therapy in selected populations, additional data and clinical studies are needed before other agents targeting BCR signaling influence clinical practice similarly. PI3K inhibitors remain an option for some relapsed indolent lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but their widespread use may be limited by adverse effects. Future research should include efforts to overcome resistance to BTK inhibitors, combination therapy using BCR-targeted agents, and exploration of novel agents.

Effective management strategies for patients with marginal zone lymphoma.

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an uncommon indolent lymphoma classified into subtypes based on primary site of involvement: splenic, nodal and extranodal. MZLs' relative rarity has largely precluded adoption of a standard management strategy. Here, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical behavior and therapeutic approaches for each subtype. Biologic insights into lymphomagenesis have identified B-cell receptor signaling as a rational therapeutic target. Recent clinical data suggest that novel agents targeting this pathway, including the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ibrutinib, show significant promise in treatment of relapsed MZL. More work is needed to evaluate these agents' activity in the front-line setting, possible combination regimens and the impact of resistance to B-cell receptor-targeted agents in order to optimize therapy in MZL.

Efficacy and tolerability of anthracycline-based therapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Although diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with rituximab and anthracycline-based therapy, within the elderly population there are additional factors to consider in selecting a treatment regimen including comorbid conditions, decreased drug metabolism, decreased hematologic reserve, reduced performance status, and regimen-related toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with DLBCL aged ≥ 65 years at time of diagnosis treated with either an anthracycline-containing regimen (ACR; n = 59) or a non-ACR (n = 13) to assess factors that led to treatment selection, tolerability, and outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 73 years in the ACR and 77 years in the non-ACR group (P = .009), and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at diagnosis was 60% in the ACR group and 45% in the non-ACR group (P < .001). With an ACR, elderly DLBCL patients had a median overall survival of 28 months and a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 64%. After an ACR, 14 patients [24%] (out of 59 total patients) had a decrease in LVEF, 7 patients [15%] (% is based off of those who we had the data collected, so this is out of 45 with this specific data) required a dose reduction of the anthracycline, and 15 patients [33%] (% is based off of those who we had the data collected, so this is out of 45 with this specific data) could not complete the regimen as planned. Hospitalization due to toxicity occurred in 20 patients [44%] (% is based off of those who we had the data collected, so this is out of 45 with data) of patients in the ACR group and 3 patients [75%] (% is based off of those who we had the data collected, so this is out of 4 with this specific data) in the non-ACR group, and was the only predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that elderly patients with DLBCL experience meaningful PFS with ACRs, but a third experience toxicity requiring therapy modification. Future studies should examine larger patient populations and define treatments with outcomes similar to ACR that also decrease toxicity and hospitalization in the elderly DLBCL population.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib: efficiency practice variables and patient preferences.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous bortezomib is noninferior in efficacy to intravenous bortezomib and is associated with a lower incidence of neuropathy in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, there are no data assessing the effect of subcutaneous bortezomib administration on practice variables or patient preferences. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the difference in efficiency practice variables and patient preferences regarding subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib administration in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: This study was divided into 2 parts consisting of mutually exclusive patients: a retrospective efficiency study and a survey study. Patients' medical records were reviewed for efficiency data measures including length of infusion chair time and overall infusion center visit time in patients who received at least 6 doses of bortezomib. Patients who received at least 1 dose each of subcutaneous and intravenous administration were surveyed regarding preference, satisfaction, injection site reactions, and quality of life measures. A database was used to identify eligible patients for each portion of the study. RESULTS: A review of 92 medical records demonstrated a 38% reduction in chair time (143 vs 89 minutes; p < 0.001) and a 27% reduction in infusion center visit time (169 vs 123 minutes; p < 0.001) with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib. Of 47 eligible patients, 60% (28) completed the survey; 68% (19; p = 0.0002) of these patients preferred and were more satisfied with subcutaneous bortezomib administration. The overall incidence of injection site reactions was 39% (11) in the surveyed population and was not significantly different between the 2 preference groups. Limitations of the study include single-center design, small sample size, and nonvalidated survey. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous administration of bortezomib is more time efficient for the patient and institution and is preferred by patients compared to intravenous bortezomib.

Bevacizumab-induced oral mucositis in background of cutaneous plaque-type psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To report the serial development of oral mucositis following infusion of bevacizumab in a young woman with a malignant brain tumor and history of cutaneous psoriasis. CASE SUMMARY: A 29-year-old woman with a history of active cutaneous psoriasis and a malignant glioneuronal tumor was treated with bevacizumab for 2.5 years. With each infusion of bevacizumab, she developed oral mucositis within 36 hours. She received temozolomide as part of concurrent therapy with radiation and as maintenance therapy; it was discontinued after continuous therapy for 1.5 years. Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was added after 7 cycles of maintenance temozolomide, as the tumor had minimal response and evidence of increased perfusion with angiogenesis on imaging studies. All medication, including temozolomide, was evaluated and eventually discontinued, with the exception of bevacizumab, which remained the drug suspected of causing the mucositis. DISCUSSION: Oral mucositis is a frequent adverse effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy, but has not been reported with bevacizumab. The Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable adverse drug reaction. This likely indicates that bevacizumab is one of many drugs known to induce exacerbation of psoriatic disease. We speculate that oral mucositis developed as bevacizumab-induced generation of proinflammatory cytokines within the vascular endothelium, leading to mucosal damage and ulceration. In addition, interruption of reparative angiogenic pathways with bevacizumab likely contributed to the severity of mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that bevacizumab can potentially exacerbate psoriatic disease.