Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 26(10): 617-621, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325784

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluates the necessity and effect of an indwelling transurethral catheter in the early postoperative period following a robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial of patients who underwent a robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Patients were randomized to have their transurethral catheter removed 6 hours postoperative (intervention group) or the morning following surgery (control group). Our primary outcome was to compare the number of patients diagnosed with postoperative incomplete bladder empyting in each group. A sample size of 36 patients per group was needed to detect a 25% difference between the 2 groups. Anticipating a 20% patient withdrawal rate, we estimated that we would need a total of 88 participants. Outcome variable was analyzed using χ test, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, 2-proportions test, and 2-sample t test. RESULTS: From December 2015 through May 2017, 88 women were randomized and analyzed: 44 in the intervention group and 44 in the control group. Women in the intervention group were more likely to be diagnosed with incomplete bladder emptying, 14 (31%) of 44, compared with the control group, 2 (4.5%) of 44, P <0.001. Rate of urinary tract infections within the 30-day postoperative period was also increased in the intervention group, 4 (9%) of 44, compared with 0 in the control group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing a robotic sacrocolpopexy, early transurethral catheter removal (6 hours postoperative) is associated with an increased rate of incomplete bladder emptying, recatheterization, and urinary tract infections.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , ROC Curve , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Time Factors , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology
2.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 22(6): 420-424, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27465813

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the short-term outcomes in patients undergoing robotic or transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for symptomatic apical prolapse at the time of hysterectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study used hospital and office electronic medical records to identify patients with symptomatic stage 2 to 4 prolapse, who had undergone either a robotic or transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension from July 2010 to January 2014. The database was searched using procedural codes for uterosacral ligament suspension. Each patient was contacted 1 year postoperatively to answer the pelvic floor distress inventory-20 via telephone, and this was compared to their initial preprocedural baseline questionnaire. RESULTS: Our primary outcome included the fulfillment of 3 criteria: (1) Prolapse leading edge of 0 or less and apex of ½ total vaginal length or less; (2) the absence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms as reported on the pelvic floor distress inventory-20 question No. 3; and (3) no prolapse reoperations or pessary use during the study period. Ninety-two percent (24/26) in the robotic group and 85% (36/42) in the vaginal group (P = 0.46) successfully fulfilled these outcome criteria. There was no significant difference in the operative data between the 2 groups. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: These short-term outcomes are promising and show a high success rate for the uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of a hysterectomy regardless of whether it was performed vaginally or robotically.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Hysterectomy, Vaginal/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Ligaments/surgery , Middle Aged , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology
3.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 22(4): 190-3, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26945272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult malignancy found in morcellated specimens removed in the context of pelvic organ prolapse repair operations. METHODS: A total of 786 cases were reviewed from a single health system between October 2006 and July 2015. Thorough chart reviews were performed to include pathological specimens. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS: Four occult malignancies were identified including 3 endometrial adenocarcinomas of the uterus and 1 papillary serous carcinoma of the uterus. The overall prevalence of occult malignancy within morcellated specimens was 0.5% (4 of 786). On adopting universal screening with endometrial biopsy, 5 malignancies were identified (5 of 176) before morcellation and no postoperative malignancies in the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: Power morcellation is a low-risk procedure with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Universal screening is highly effective in detecting occult malignancy and in our small series eliminated the risk; studies in multiple institutions will be needed to determine its effectiveness in other hospital systems.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hysterectomy , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Incidental Findings , Leiomyoma/epidemiology , Leiomyoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Morcellation/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Unknown Primary/pathology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...