Human tear fluid PDGF-BB, TNF-alpha and TGF-beta1 vs corneal haze and regeneration of corneal epithelium and subbasal nerve plexus after PRK.

The aim was to determine the association of tear fluid cytokine levels and post-PRK corneal haze evaluated by in vivo confocal microscopy. In addition, the possible association between subbasal neural regeneration and haze formation, or epithelial regeneration were investigated. Twenty eyes of 20 patients (16 women and four men, age 30.7 +/- 7.5 years, range 21-48 years) underwent a myopic PRK. The spherical equivalent (SE) of the intended correction was -4.7 +/- 1.5 D (range -2.75 to -9.00 D). ELISA-methods were used to assess tear fluid concentrations of TGF-beta1, PDGF-BB and TNF-alpha pre-operatively, and post-operatively on day 2 and at 3 months. Tear fluid flow in the collection capillary was recorded, and rates of cytokine release (= tear fluid flow-corrected concentrations) were calculated. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed at 3 months to evaluate the corneal morphology and to determine numerical haze estimate. There was wide interindividual variation between pre-operative and post-operative concentrations and rates of release of TGF-beta1, PDGF-BB and TNF-alpha. Subepithelial haze was observed in all corneas and the mean haze estimate was 506 +/- 401 U (100-1410 U). However, no association was found between tear fluid cytokine levels and post-PRK haze. Regenerating subbasal nerve plexus was found in 18 out of 20 corneas; in two corneas it was absent or could not be visualized due to subepithelial haze. The density of the subbasal nerve fiber bundles had a positive correlation with the epithelial thickness (Pearson correlation, r = 0.56, P = 0.011), but not with the haze estimate or the thickness of the haze area. At 3 months post-PRK, haze could be observed in all patients. The results suggest that tear fluid cytokine analysis, as measured, may not be suitable for screening the potential candidates for haze formation. We did not find any correlation between haze and regeneration of subbasal nerve plexus, but we demonstrated that the regeneration of subbasal nerve plexus might have significant influence on regulation of epithelial healing.

Laser in situ keratomileusis flap margin: wound healing and complications imaged by in vivo confocal microscopy.

PURPOSE: To examine the healing response of laser in situ keratomileusis flap margin in vivo. METHODS: Forty-three eyes of 43 patients who had undergone myopic (n = 39) or hyperopic (n = 4) laser in situ keratomileusis were examined once after surgery. The flap margin was imaged by in vivo confocal microscopy at various depths, and the wound healing response, flap alignment, and complications were evaluated. Ten eyes were examined on day 3 postoperatively, 13 eyes at 1 to 2 weeks, 10 eyes at 1 to 2 months, five eyes at 3 months, and five eyes at 6 months or later. RESULTS: At 3 days after laser in situ keratomileusis, the surface epithelium and basal epithelium appeared normal. Keratocyte activation was strongest at 1 to 2 weeks and 1 to 2 months, and an increased amount of haze was observed correspondingly. Intrastromal epithelial cells forming a plug could occasionally be perceived in the wound gape. Wound constriction was completed in most cases by 3 to 6 months or later. Good alignment was observed in 12 of 43 flaps (27.9%) and moderate and poor alignment in 17 of 43 flaps (39.5%) and 13 of 43 flaps (30.2%), respectively. Poor alignment was not associated with lamellar epithelial ingrowth. Epithelial ingrowth was associated with dense haze at the interface. Diffuse lamellar keratitis was imaged in two corneas after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. CONCLUSIONS: The laser in situ keratomileusis incision wound at the flap margin appears to heal after the sequence observed in incisional wounds in nonhuman primates. Complications, such as lamellar epithelial in growth and diffuse lamellar keratitis, were often observed, particularly after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.