ABSTRACT
Introduction: Hip impingement from slipped epiphysis and idiopathic cam is well known but not fully differentiated. Idiopathic cam can be a result of an undiagnosed slip. The mechanism of remodeling of slipped epiphysis deformity has also been controversial. The causes of recurrent femoral head deformity and new impingement beyond progression of the slip have not been studied. Materials and Methods: A consecutive series of hips treated by arthroscopic femoral neck osteoplasty for impingement from slipped epiphysis were compared with a series of hips treated for idiopathic cam impingement. Demographics and clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic features were retrospectively retrieved. The same parameters were studied in another consecutive series of hips treated for slipped epiphysis and developed recurrent pain from impingement. The deformity was analyzed to understand the causes of recurrence in these hips. The medial most point where the femoral head sphericity ended was called the Alpha point and the tissue covering the bone at the Alpha point was identified. Results: Children with idiopathic cam were older, had less pain and limp, and less clinical deformity compared to those with slipped epiphysis. The damage pattern was chondrolabral separation and acetabular cartilage debonding from the subchondral bone by an articular cartilage covered bump in idiopathic cam impingement, while it was labral crushing and labral and cartilage abrasion by metaphyseal bone in slip impingement. Recurrent cam deformities after initial slips were from epiphyseal extension similar to the idiopathic cam deformity in 7 out of 9 hips. Discussion: Slipped epiphysis and idiopathic cam seem to be distinct entities at the time of presentation. They were different in all findings except for having pain with flexion and internal rotation in both groups. Remodeling of slip deformity seems to occur by wear of the metaphyseal prominence on the acetabulum. Recurrence or worsening of cam deformity in slips occurred by growth of the epiphysis on to the neck anteriorly which can appear as a decrease in the posterior slip. The relationship of the Alpha point to the physeal scar and the tissue covering the femoral head at the Alpha point help differentiate between epiphyseal and metaphyseal cam deformities. Level of Evidence: Level 3 retrospective comparative study.
ABSTRACT
Background: Safe surgical dislocation of the hip is a versatile approach to the hip joint with a low complication rate. Hip joint instability is a devastating complication with poor prognosis. Methods: All hips treated surgically through the safe surgical dislocation approach were entered in a database and the complication of hip joint instability was studied prospectively from 2000 to 2021. Instability was diagnosed by intraoperative stress examination and on postoperative radiographs. The initial deformities treated, type of instability, presumed causes, treatment provided, response to the treatment, and final result were recorded as they happened during the course of the treatment. We considered patient's age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and initial diagnosis as risk factors. We evaluated the radiographs for femoral neck shortening, lack of greater trochanteric advancement, acetabular deformity, and incongruity of the hip joint. Anterior hip precautions were initiated in the middle of the study period. Results: 22/459 hips developed hip joint instability after surgical dislocation approach performed for hip preservation. Acetabular deficiency, coxa breva, coxa valga, posterior impingement, increased anteversion, lax soft tissues, medial thigh obesity and lack of postoperative precautions seemed to contribute to instability. 50% of the hips became normal. Chondrolysis and residual subluxation were common in the others. Conclusion: Surgical dislocation approach disrupts the soft tissue restraints of the hip and joint stability depends on bony morphology, abductor muscle tension, and postoperative precautions. Several risk factors were subjective and speculative, but awareness of all the potential risk factors and prevention and treatment options should decrease this complication. Level of Evidence: IV Case series.
