Safety and Adverse Events of Medialization Thyroplasty: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Unilateral vocal fold paralysis or paresis (UVFP) is a condition that causes significant morbidity due to dysphonia, dysphagia, and aspiration. Type I medialization thyroplasty (MT) is the current mainstay surgical treatment for UVFP. Though widely considered a safe procedure, concerns exist over possible airway complications which can lead to overnight observation. Herein, we report a systematic review of the safety and adverse events of MT to aid in determining the safety of same-day discharge. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase databases. REVIEW METHODS: Our search identified studies investigating complications associated with MT. Articles were selected if published between January 1, 1989 and March 15, 2023. Abstracts were screened, and data were extracted from included studies. Only Type I MT procedures were included; case reports were excluded. Participant characteristics, intervention details, results, and adverse events were extracted. RESULTS: The database query identified 751 abstracts, of which 46 studies met eligibility criteria. A total of 2426 patients underwent MT. The most common implant was Silastic (n = 898, 37.0%) followed by Gore-Tex (n = 664, 27.4%). There were 254 (10.5%) total complications reported; 110 (4.5%) were considered major. The most common complication was nonobstructive hematoma (n = 59, 2.4%) followed by hemorrhage (n = 36, 1.5%). Implant extrusion (n = 24, 0.99%) or displacement (n = 15, 0.62%) occurred mostly in Silastic and Gore-Tex implants. Same-day discharge occurred with 429 patients and was not associated with adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: UVFP can be reliably improved by MT with a low risk of complications. Outpatient MT is a promising treatment with a favorable safety profile. Laryngoscope, 134:1994-2004, 2024.

A New Technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Retrograde Ureteroscopy and Laser Fiber to Achieve Percutaneous Nephrostomy Access: The Initial Case Report.

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) serves as the gold standard minimally invasive procedure to remove large renal stones. The puncture is made from the skin to the chosen calix under fluoroscopic guidance, although this remains a challenging technique. We describe the initial case of retrograde holmium laser acquired nephrostomy access. Case Presentation: In this study, we present the case of a 48-year-old woman with right renal colic with imaging revealing a 2.6 cm staghorn stone. With institutional approval, we performed a new technique utilizing retrograde access with a flexible ureteroscope and a holmium laser fiber to achieve nephrostomy access for PCNL in the prone position. With the ureteroscope confirmed in the desired calix, the ureteroscope and laser fiber were aimed and fired toward the flank and thus creating a subcostal nephrostomy tract. PCNL was then carried out per standard of care lithotripsy techniques utilizing the holmium laser. Conclusion: In this initial case, percutaneous retrograde laser access allowed for desired caliceal nephrostomy access under direct vision.

Ureteral Access Sheath Deployment: How Much Force Is Too Much? Initial Studies with a Novel Ureteral Access Sheath Force Sensor in the Porcine Ureter.

Introduction and Objectives: Ureteral injuries can occur during ureteral access sheath (UAS) deployment. The force exerted during deployment and the amount of force that results in ureteral injury is yet to be accurately quantitated. In this feasibility study, we developed and then tested a novel force-sensing device in our animal laboratory to identify the threshold force that results in a porcine ureteral injury. Methods: With Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, we measured ureteral dilator and UAS deployment force using our proprietary University of California, Irvine Ureteral Access Sheath Force Sensor (UAS-FS). The exerted force was measured during deployment from the moment that the tip of the UAS was passed into the urethral meatus until it reached the renal pelvis; progression of the UAS along the ureter was monitored with fluoroscopy. Ureteroscopic evaluation was performed after deployment of each catheter/sheath ≥8F to assess for ureteral injury using the Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS). Results: Six juvenile Yorkshire female pigs (12 ureters) were studied. No injuries were detected when the deployment force was <4 Newtons (N), which was the case when the catheter/access sheath was ≤13F. Increasing UAS size >13F resulted in greater peak forces. In five of the pigs, ureters selected for 14F UAS deployment without previous sequential dilation were injured (PULS ≥3) at a mean threshold force of 4.84 N. Serial dilation had a higher threshold for PULS ≥3 at 5.56 N. Overall, injury of PULS ≥3 was routinely noted when the force applied exceeded 8.1 N. Conclusions: The UAS-FS reliably measured forces while deploying a UAS. Significant ureteral injury can routinely be avoided if the applied force is <4.84 N; PULS ≥3 routinely occurred when forces exceeded 8.1 N. Serial dilation may allow safe passage at higher deployment forces, as much as 5.56 N.

Laser Endoscopic X-Ray-Guided Intrarenal Tract: Comparison Among Renal Access Modalities in the Porcine Kidney.

Introduction and Objectives: Laser endoscopic X-ray-guided intrarenal tract (LEXIT) is a recently described holmium laser retrograde access technique for creating percutaneous access during a percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We compared bleeding, ease of access, and the time to achieve access for each of the following three modalities: LEXIT, retrograde Lawson puncture wire, and antegrade 18-gauge nephrostomy needle access in the porcine kidney. Methods: Eight pigs underwent an average of five nephrostomy accesses per kidney under simultaneous laparoscopic vision at 5 mm Hg insufflation pressure. Data collected included: access time (seconds), bleeding intensity (scale: 1 [no bleeding] - 10 [severe bleeding]), bleeding duration (seconds), accuracy of caliceal entry, and surgeon comfort with the technique (scale: 1 [very easy] - 10 [very difficult]). Results: A total of 64 nephrostomy accesses were obtained. The speed of nephrostomy access with LEXIT was significantly faster than the nephrostomy needle and Lawson wire (p < 0.001). Bleeding intensity (p = 0.002) and severity (p = 0.001) were lower with the Lawson puncture wire, followed by LEXIT and then by the nephrostomy needle. LEXIT was rated as easier in acquiring access within the upper pole (p = 0.003) and interpolar calices (p < 0.001). Histopathology demonstrated no difference in parenchymal damage between LEXIT and nephrostomy needle (p = 0.18); however, LEXIT was associated with significantly increased peri-tract thermal injury, although within a narrow focus of 1.6 mm (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Among the three renal access techniques, LEXIT provided the fastest access times and greatest ease of access specifically for upper pole and interpolar calices. Also, bleeding with LEXIT was significantly less compared with the standard antegrade nephrostomy needle access. Histopathological analysis demonstrated that the holmium laser resulted in focal thermal tissue effects similar in range to the blunt tissue trauma caused by the 18-gauge nephrostomy needle.

A New Twist on an Old Technique: Lawson Retrograde Endoscopic-Guided Nephrostomy Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone Split-Leg Position.

Background: A minority of urologists performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) achieve their own nephrostomy access. In an effort to simplify the access part of PCNL, we herein describe our initial experience with endoscopic-guided retrograde percutaneous access in the prone split-leg position. Case Presentation(s): After informed consent, a confirmed negative urine culture, and 1 week pretreatment with tamsulosin, four carefully selected PCNL patients underwent endoscopic-guided retrograde access in a prone split-leg position using the Lawson catheter. In all the four patients, we achieved endoscopic-guided retrograde upper pole access in the prone split-leg position. A single Clavien 3B complication occurred. Total fluoroscopy time for the PCNL averaged 162 seconds (51-283). Complete stone-free rate at 1 week based on CT scan was 25%, and a stone-free rate defined as <4 mm was 100%. Conclusion: Endoscopic-guided retrograde percutaneous upper pole access can be established efficiently with a modified Lawson technique in the prone split-leg position.

Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Ureteroscopic Videos Using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale to Assess Ureteral Injury.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that crowdsourcing assessments could be applied to the Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) for ureteral injury. METHODS: At a single institution, we prospectively digitally recorded 14 ureters at the terminal portion of standard ureteroscopic procedures. Each recording was reviewed by 10 global experts to determine a mean PULS score. Following training, the Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills, C-SATS® (C-SATS, Inc., Seattle, WA) platform was used to obtain crowd-based reviews. The mean crowd PULS scores was determined using the linear mixed-effects (LME) model. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to measure the agreement among experts. Spearman's rank correlation (rho) was used to quantify the strength of the relationship between the crowd LME mean and the experts. RESULTS: Ten expert's reviews and 2100 layman reviews were obtained in 21 days and 49 hours, respectively. The ICC for the 10 experts was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.49, 0.86). When the expert mean PULS was <1, the crowd scored those recordings at 1 or greater. The highest scored recording by the experts was a 3.2, which the crowd scored at 2.25. The correlation between the crowd LME means and expert means across all videos was 0.70 (p = 0.0056) indicative of moderately strong agreement. CONCLUSION: In this initial application of crowd-sourced evaluation of ureteral injury, there was a moderately strong correlation between crowd and expert ratings. Refinement of the training, through exposure to the nuances of ureteral injuries, in particular for PULS <1 or ≥3, may lead to better crowd/expert correlation. Compared to expert review, crowd data can be collected with much greater efficiency.