How does visual manipulation affect obstacle avoidance strategies used by athletes?

Research examining our ability to avoid obstacles in our path has stressed the importance of visual input. The aim of this study was to determine if athletes playing varsity-level field sports, who rely on visual input to guide motor behaviour, are more able to guide their foot over obstacles compared to recreational individuals. While wearing kinematic markers, eight varsity athletes and eight age-matched controls (aged 18-25) walked along a walkway and stepped over stationary obstacles (180° motion arc). Visual input was manipulated using PLATO visual goggles three or two steps pre-obstacle crossing and compared to trials where vision was given throughout. A main effect between groups for peak trail toe elevation was shown with greater values generated by the controls for all crossing conditions during full vision trials only. This may be interpreted as athletes not perceiving this obstacle as an increased threat to their postural stability. Collectively, findings suggest the athletic group is able to transfer their abilities to non-specific conditions during full vision trials; however, varsity-level athletes were equally reliant on visual cues for these visually guided stepping tasks as their performance was similar to the controls when vision is removed.

Control of steering in the presence of unexpected head yaw movements. Influence on sequencing of subtasks.

Control of the head during locomotion has been suggested as a means of facilitating overall postural control of the body. The control of online steering is challenging, as it requires the central nervous system (CNS) to simultaneously control body reorientation in a new direction while modifying the ongoing step cycle. Stable body posture during steering is maintained via appropriately organized postural responses to error signals detected by the visual, vestibular, and/or proprioceptive systems. Modifications to the gait cycle include step-width regulation and movement of body center of mass (COM) in the direction of travel, and may be preceded by independent control of head orientation to see where one is going. The purpose of this investigation was to examine how the ability to successfully steer is influenced by unexpected head perturbations and how various body segments are coordinated and controlled to successfully steer along different pathways. Body kinematics were monitored as participants changed their direction of travel by varying amounts when visually cued one stride before the turn. Perturbations to the head were applied to either assist or oppose the change in direction one step prior to initiation of the turn. Analyses focused on the timing of the changes in head yaw, trunk yaw, and COM trajectories in the mediolateral plane. Results indicate that the order of control over the body segments was head and trunk reorientation in the direction of travel and finally movement of the COM in the intended direction. Thus gaze, inferred from head movement, preceded changes in COM trajectory. This suggests that looking where you are going is critical for steering. When steering is potentially compromised by unexpected head movements, the CNS delays committing movement of the COM until it has a chance to look at the new travel path.