The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. RESULTS: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). CONCLUSION: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test(BOT-8): Validation of a New Test in the Spanish Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. Results: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). Conclusions: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic (AU)

Introducción: Las olfatometrías son difíciles de implementar en la práctica clínica diaria por su larga duración. El objetivo del presente estudio fue desarrollar y validar una prueba simple, fácil y reutilizable para ser utilizada durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Se incluyeron 120 voluntarios sanos ≥18 años y 195 pacientes con disfunción olfatoria (DO) autoreportada. Se utilizó el Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) con 8 odorantes para la detección, memoria/reconocimiento e identificación. Además, se hizo una prueba de umbral de rosa (alcohol feniletílico) de 6 diluciones, escala visual analógica (EVA). Se compararon los resultados con una prueba validada Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT), para definir puntos de corte de hiposmia y anosmia se comparó en pacientes con DO con UPSITTM. Considerando la pandemia de COVID-19, se compararon hisopos de algodón desechables con los odorantes respecto a la prueba original. Resultados: BOT-8 se tarda entre 3 y 7 minutos en realizar. En población sana, la media de detección fue del 100%, memoria 94,5% (DE=1,07) e identificación 89,6% (DE=0,86). En pacientes con DO fue de 86% (DE=32,8), 73,2% (DE=37,9) y 77,1% (DE=34,2), respectivamente. BOT-8 demostró buena fiabilidad test-retest con 96,7% de concordancia observada y una kappa cuadrática de 0,84 (p<0,001). Presentó una fuerte correlación con SDOT (r=0,673, p <0,001) en población sana y con UPSITTM en pacientes con DO (r=0,86, p<0,001). Los hisopos de algodón desechables mostraron una excelente concordancia (kappa de 0,79) en comparación con la prueba original. El punto de corte para anosmia fue ≤ 3 (AUC=0,83, Se= 0,673, Sp=0,993) y de hiposmia ≤ 6 (AUC=0,451, Se= 0,088, Sp= 0,814). Conclusiones: BOT-8 ofrece un método eficiente y rápido para ser utilizado en la práctica clínica diaria para evaluar el sentido del olfato mediante la detección, memoria, identificación y umbral (AU)

Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test ̶ 6 (pBOT-6): Validation of a Combined Odor Identification and Threshold Screening Test in Healthy Spanish Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few odor tests have been developed for children. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a simple and quick olfactory test to evaluate odor identification and threshold in a Spanish pediatric population. METHODS: The Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test-6 (pBOT-6) consisted of a set of 6 odorants for a forced choice identification test and a 6-dilution phenyl ethyl alcohol geometric series for the threshold test. The pBOT-6 was compared with the Universal Sniff test (a validated international pediatric smell test) in 131 healthy Spanish volunteers aged 6-17 years. A Bland-Altman plot was used to determine the agreement between the 2 tests. Reliability was analyzed in 15 volunteers using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained, and 8 children diagnosed with subjective loss of smell were tested for validation. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a minimal bias of -1.71% with upper and lower limits of agreement of -31.1% and 27.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95%CI, 0.6-0.96) for the identification test and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.36-0.9) for the threshold test, with excellent and good consistency between measurements over time. Mean pBOT-6 scores were significantly higher in healthy volunteers than in patients with loss of smell. Discrimination between normosmia and loss of smell was achieved with a sensitivity of 96.9% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: pBOT-6 offers an effective and fast method that is useful in clinical routine to distinguish, with high sensitivity and specificity, between pediatric patients with normosmia and those with loss of smell.

Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test - 6 (pBOT-6): validation of a combined odor identification and threshold screening test in healthy Spanish children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: Few odor tests have been developed for children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a simple and quick olfactory test to evaluate odor identification and threshold in a Spanish pediatric population. METHODS: The Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test-6 (pBOT-6) consisted of a set of 6 odorants for a forced choice identification test and a 6-dilution phenyl ethyl alcohol geometric series for the threshold test. The pBOT-6 was compared with the Universal Sniff test (a validated international pediatric smell test) in 131 healthy Spanish volunteers aged 6-17 years. A Bland-Altman plot was used to determine the agreement between the 2 tests. Reliability was analyzed in 15 volunteers using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained, and 8 children diagnosed with subjective loss of smell were tested for validation. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a minimal bias of -1.71% with upper and lower limits of agreement of -31.1% and 27.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95%CI, 0.6-0.96) for the identification test and 0.73 (95%CI, 0.36-0.9) for the threshold test, with excellent and good consistency between measurements over time. Mean pBOT-6 scores were significantly higher in healthy volunteers than in patients with loss of smell. Discrimination between normosmia and loss of smell was achieved with a sensitivity of 96.9% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: pBOT-6 offers an effective and fast method that is useful in clinical routine to distinguish, with high sensitivity and specificity, between pediatric patients with normosmia and those with loss of smell

ANTECEDENTES: Existen pocas pruebas de olfato para niños. OBJETIVOS: Desarrollar y validar una prueba de olfato simple y rápida para evaluar la identificación y el umbral olfativo en la población pediátrica española. MÉTODOS: El Pediatric Barcelona Olfactory Test-6 (pBOT-6) consiste en un set de 6 odorantes para la prueba de identificación forzada y una serie de 6 diluciones de feniletil alcohol para la prueba de umbral. El pBOT-6 se comparó con el Universal Sniff Test (una prueba de olfato pediátrica validada internacionalmente) en 131 voluntarios españoles sanos de entre 6 y 17 años. Se utilizó el método gráfico de Bland-Altman para determinar la concordancia entre las 2 pruebas. La fiabilidad se analizó en 15 voluntarios utilizando el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Se obtuvieron los valores de normalidad y validó la prueba en 8 niños diagnosticados de pérdida subjetiva del olfato. RESULTADOS: El método de Bland-Altman demostró un sesgo mínimo de -1,71% con límites superior e inferior de acuerdo de -31,1% y 27,6%, respectivamente. El coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue de 0,83 (IC 95%, 0,6-0,96) para la prueba de identificación y 0,73 (IC 95%, 0,36-0,9) para la prueba de umbral, con excelente y buena concordancia entre las mediciones a lo largo del tiempo. Las puntuaciones medias del pBOT-6 fueron significativamente más altas en voluntarios sanos que en pacientes con pérdida del olfato. Se obstuvo la discriminación entre normosmia y pérdida del olfato con una sensibilidad del 96,9% y una especificidad del 100%. CONCLUSIONES: pBOT-6 ofrece un método eficaz y rápido que es útil en la práctica clínica para distinguir, con alta sensibilidad y especificidad, entre pacientes pediátricos con normosmia y aquellos con pérdida del olfato

Modified nasal floor and inferior meatus flap for septal perforation repair. Extension and limits.

BACKGROUND: The nasal floor and inferior meatus (NFIM) flap represents an available option for the reconstruction of a septal perforation (SP). This study explores the feasibility of repairing SPs using a modified simple and extended (including inferior turbinate) NFIM flap. METHODS: An anatomic study was achieved in fresh frozen cadaveric specimens to measure the area and lengths of NFIM flap. The repair of SP with simple and extended NIFM flaps was performed in some of these cadaveric specimens. Preoperative radiological evaluation of CT scans allowed studying the reconstruction limits of the simple or extended NFIM flap. A cohort of patients with SP who underwent reconstruction with an NFIM flap was also included. RESULTS: Complete SP repair with NFIM was achieved in all specimens (n=10). In 38 fresh cadaveric specimens, coronal and sagittal lengths and area of simple NFIM flaps were smaller than in extended NFIM flaps. The radiological analysis of 75 CT scans revealed that the septal height could be reconstructed with a simple and extended NFIM flap. Complete SP repair wasachieved in 5 patients (4 male, mean age 57.4 years) using modified NFIM flaps. CONCLUSION: The simple or expanded NFIM flap represents a feasible option to repair small or medium-sized perforations located at the lower 1/3 or 3/4 of the nasal septum.