Comparison of Telfa Rolling and a Closed Washing System for Autologous Fat Processing Techniques in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the commonly used fat grafting techniques-Telfa rolling and a closed washing system-in breast reconstruction patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing fat grafting were retrospectively reviewed and grouped by technique. Patients with less than 180 days of follow-up were excluded. Demographics, operative details, and complications were compared using univariate analysis with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Between January of 2013 and September of 2017, 186 women underwent a total of 319 fat grafting procedures. There was no difference in demographics, number of procedures performed, volume of fat grafted, and number of days after reconstruction that fat grafting was performed between groups (p > 0.05). Telfa rolling patients had longer operative times for second fat grafting procedures (implant exchange often completed prior) [100.0 minutes (range, 60.0 to 150.0 minutes) versus 79.0 minutes (range, 64.0 to 94.0 minutes); p = 0.03]. Telfa rolling breasts had more palpable masses requiring imaging (26.0 percent versus 14.4 percent; p = 0.01) and an increased incidence of fat necrosis (20.6 percent versus 8.0 percent; p < 0.01). The closed washing system was found to be an independent predictor of decreased rates of imaging-confirmed fat necrosis (OR, 0.29; p = 0.048). There was no difference in fat necrosis excision or cancer recurrence between the groups. CONCLUSION: The closed washing system was independently associated with decreased rates of imaging-confirmed fat necrosis compared to Telfa rolling without an increase in other complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.

BACKGROUND: The numerous office visits required to complete expansion in implant-based breast reconstruction impact patient satisfaction, office resources, and time to complete reconstruction. This study aimed to determine whether prepectoral compared to subpectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction offers expedited tissue expansion without affecting complication rates. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with tissue expanders from January of 2016 to July of 2017 by a single surgeon were grouped into subpectoral (partial submuscular/partial acellular dermal matrix) or prepectoral (complete acellular dermal matrix coverage), and reviewed. The primary outcomes were total days and number of visits to complete expansion. Groups were compared by univariate analysis with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients (subpectoral, n = 69; prepectoral, n = 32) underwent 184 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions (subpectoral, n = 124; prepectoral, n = 60). There was no difference in age, body mass index, smoking, or diabetes between the groups (all p > 0.05). Follow-up was similar between groups (179.3 ± 98.2 days versus 218.3 ± 119.8 days; p = 0.115). Prepectoral patients took fewer days to complete expansion (40.4 ± 37.8 days versus 62.5 ± 50.2 days; p < 0.001) and fewer office visits to complete expansion (2.3 ± 1 .7 versus 3.9 ± 1.8; p < 0.001), and were expanded to greater final volumes than subpectoral patients (543.7 ± 122.9 ml versus 477.5 ± 159.6 ml; p = 0.017). Between prepectoral and subpectoral reconstructions, there were similar rates of minor complications (25 percent versus 18.5 percent; p = 0.311), readmissions (5 percent versus 2.4 percent; p = 0.393), seromas (8.3 percent versus 5.6 percent; p = 0.489), reoperations for hematoma (3.3 percent versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.597), and explantations (5 percent versus 2.4 percent; p = 0.393). CONCLUSION: This novel analysis demonstrates that prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction can facilitate expansion to higher total volumes in nearly half the office visits compared to subpectoral placement in similar populations without increasing complication rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Immediate Use of Uncuffed Tracheostomy after Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck.

Objective To determine if immediate postoperative uncuffed tracheostomy placement following oral cavity or oropharyngeal head and neck free flap reconstruction is associated with shorter hospital length of stay and higher inpatient decannulation rates without an increase in respiratory complications, as compared with immediate placement of cuffed tracheostomy. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Patients were included if they underwent free flap reconstruction for oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and had an intraoperative tracheostomy placed between 2005 and 2016. In 2012, head and neck surgeons changed from routine placement of cuffed to uncuffed tracheostomy tubes immediately after free flap reconstruction. This study compares length of hospital stay, inpatient decannulation rates, and respiratory complications between patients who had cuffed and uncuffed tracheostomies. Analysis of variance and chi-square test were used to examine continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether cuff status was independently associated with primary outcomes of length of hospital stay, decannulation, and respiratory complications. Results Of 752 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction, 493 patients met inclusion criteria (cuffed, n = 366; uncuffed, n = 127). Patient variables (ie, age, sex, body mass index, prior chemoradiation) and tumor characteristics (ie, location, stage) did not differ significantly between groups. Adjusted analysis showed that an uncuffed tracheostomy (vs a cuffed tracheostomy) was associated with shorter length of stay (7.7 vs 9.7 days, P < .001) and did not increase the rate of respiratory complications. Conclusion Immediate placement of a uncuffed tracheostomy after oral cavity or oropharyngeal free flap reconstruction is associated with shorter hospital stays without an increase in respiratory complications.