Return to work during first year after intensive care treatment and the impact of demographic, clinical and psychosocial factors.

OBJECTIVES: To describe work participation in survivors during first year after intensive care unit discharge and examine the impact of selected demographic, clinical and psychosocial factors on return to work 12 months after discharge. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: A predefined sub-study (prospective cohort study) of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A Norwegian single-centre university hospital. Medical and surgical adult intensive care survivors, working/on sick leave before admission, in the intensive care unit ≥24 h, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return to work three, six and 12 months after discharge, and impact of age, pre-existing comorbidities, previous serious life events, coping ability, hope and social support on return to work 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: Included were 284 patients, with mean age 47 years (SD 13.9) and 47 % women. One year after discharge, 69 % were back at work. In the regression analysis, with working at 12 months (yes/no) as the dependent variable, 178 patients, completing questionnaires at three as well as 12 months, were included. Lower age (OR 0.96, 95 % CI [0.93-0.99]), lower pre-existing comorbidities (OR 0.65, 95 % CI [0.43-0.97]), previous serious life events (OR 6.53, 95 % CI [2.14-19.94]), and greater hope at three months (OR 1.09, 95 % CI [1.01-1.17]) were all independently associated with higher odds of returning to work. CONCLUSION: Following intensive care, age, pre-existing comorbidities, experience of previous serious life events and hope all have a significant impact on return to work, and are important variables to consider during intensive care treatment and rehabilitation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Attention must be paid to patients with prior working capability to ensure return to work after intensive care treatment. Older adults with pre-existing comorbidities might benefit from early, individualised rehabilitation to regain previous working capacity. In addition, there is also a need to support patients' hope during and after critical illness.

Occurrence and characteristics of pain after ICU discharge: A longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a serious problem for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but we are lacking data on pain at the hospital ward after ICU discharge. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe pain intensity, -interference with function and -location in patients up to 1 year after ICU discharge. To identify demographic and clinical variables and their association with worst pain intensity and pain interference. DESIGN: A longitudinal descriptive secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial on nurse-led follow-up consultations on post-traumatic stress and sense of coherence after ICU discharge. METHODS: Pain intensity, -interference, and -location were measured using Brief Pain Inventory at the hospital ward and 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge. For associations, data were analysed using multivariate linear mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: Of 523 included patients, 68% reported worst pain intensity score above 0 (no pain) at the ward. Estimated means for worst pain intensity and -interference (from 0 to 10) after ICU discharge were 5.5 [CI 4.6-6.5] and 4.5 [CI 3.7-5.3], and decreased to 3.8 [CI 2.8-4.8] (P ≤ .001) and 2.9 [CI 2.1-3.7] after 12 months (P ≤ .001). Most common pain locations were abdomen (43%), lower lumbar back (28%), and shoulder/forearm (22%). At 12 months, post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms ≥25 (scale 10-70), female gender, shorter ICU stay, and more traumatic ICU memories were significantly associated with higher worst pain intensity. PTS symptoms ≥25, female gender, more traumatic ICU memories, younger age, and not having an internal medical diagnosis were significantly associated with higher pain interference. CONCLUSIONS: Early after ICU discharge pain was present in 68% of patients. Thereafter, pain intensity and -interference declined, but pain intensity was still at a moderate level at 12 months. Health professionals should be aware of patients' pain and identify potentially vulnerable patients. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Longitudinal assessment of factors associated with pain early after ICU discharge and the following year is a first step that could improve follow-up focus and contribute to reduced development of chronic pain.

Effect of Nurse-Led Consultations on Post-Traumatic Stress and Sense of Coherence in Discharged ICU Patients With Clinically Relevant Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of nurse-led consultations on reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms and increasing sense of coherence in discharged ICU patients with clinically relevant post-traumatic stress symptoms and to identify variables associated with symptoms 12 months later. DESIGN: A pragmatic nonblinded randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Five surgical and medical ICUs at Oslo University Hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients treated in the ICU greater than or equal to 24 hours were screened with Post-Traumatic Stress Scale 10 intensive part B after ICU discharge. Those scoring greater than or equal to 25 were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to intervention group were offered three nurse-led consultations within 2 months, and patients in the control group received standard care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sense of Coherence Scale 13 and Post-Traumatic Stress Scale 10 intensive part B were completed after inclusion, and reevaluated after 3, 6, and 12 months. Linear mixed model for repeated measures and linear regression analyses were performed. Among 523 screened patients, 111 and 113 were randomized to intervention group and control group, respectively. Mean Post-Traumatic Stress Scale 10 intensive part B score was 37 (±10) before randomization. No differences in post-traumatic stress symptoms or sense of coherence were found between intervention group versus control group, with a mean Post-Traumatic Stress Scale 10 intensive part B score 39 (95% CI, 37-41) versus 37 (95% CI, 35-39), 32 (95% CI, 28-35) versus 32 (95% CI, 29-35), 31 (95% CI, 28-34) versus 30 (95% CI, 27-33), and 31 (95% CI, 28-34) versus 29 (95% CI, 26-33) at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There was a significantly reduced Post-Traumatic Stress Scale 10 intensive part B score for both groups during the year (p = 0.001). Low sense of coherence, pain, and previous psychiatric problems were associated with increased level of post-traumatic stress symptoms at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led consultations did not reveal any significant effect on post-traumatic stress symptoms or sense of coherence after ICU discharge in patients with clinically relevant symptoms.

Post-traumatic stress symptoms and sense of coherence in proximity to intensive care unit discharge.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms following intensive care unit (ICU) treatment can lead to post-traumatic stress disorder and represent a severe health burden. In trauma patients, a strong sense of coherence (SOC) is associated with fewer PTS symptoms. However, this association has not been investigated in a general ICU sample. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the occurrence of PTS symptoms in general ICU patients early after ICU discharge and to assess possible associations between PTS symptoms and SOC, ICU memory, pain, and demographic and clinical characteristics. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Adult patients aged ≥18 years admitted for ≥24 hours to five ICUs between 2014 and 2016 were recruited. PTS symptoms and SOC were measured at the ward within the first week after discharge from the ICU using the Posttraumatic Stress Scale-10 and Sense of Coherence Scale-13. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify associations between PTS symptoms and SOC and the selected independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 523 patients were included (17.8% trauma patients; median age 57 years [range 18-94]; 53.3% male). The prevalence of clinically significant PTS symptoms was 32%. After adjustments for gender and age, lower SOC (P < 0.001), more ICU delusional memories (P < 0.001), greater pain interference (P < 0.001), not being a trauma patient (P = 0.02), and younger age (P = 0.03) were significantly associated with more PTS symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: One third of patients experienced clinically relevant PTS symptoms early after discharge from the ICU. In the present study, SOC, delusional memory, pain interference, younger age, and not being a trauma patient were factors associated with more PTS symptoms. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Early individual follow up after ICU discharge focusing on pain relief and delusional memory may reduce PTS symptoms, with a potential of improving rehabilitation.