Transition of Adolescents With Severe Asthma From Pediatric to Adult Care in Spain: The STAR Consensus.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of consensus among a multidisciplinary expert panel on the transition of adolescents with severe asthma from pediatric to adult care. METHODS: A 61-item survey was developed based on guidelines for other chronic diseases, covering transition planning, preparation, effective transfer, and follow-up. A 2-round Delphi process assessed the degree of consensus among 98 experts (49 pediatricians, 24 allergists, and 25 pulmonologists). Consensus was established with ≥70% agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 42 items (70%). Panelists were unable to agree on an age range for initiation of transition. The main goal during the transition identified by the experts is for adolescents to gain autonomy in managing severe asthma and prescribed treatments. The panelists agreed on the importance of developing an individualized plan, promoting patient autonomy, and identifying factors associated with the home environment. They agreed that the adult health care team should have expertise in severe asthma, biologics, and management of adolescent patients. Pediatric and adult health care teams should share clinical information, agree on the criteria for maintaining biological therapy, and have an on-site joint visit with the patient before the effective transfer. Adult health care professionals should closely follow the patient after the effective transfer to ensure correct inhaler technique, adherence, and attendance at health care appointments. CONCLUSION: This consensus document provides the first roadmap for Spanish pediatric and adult teams to ensure that key aspects of the transition process in severe asthma are covered. The implementation of these recommendations will improve the quality of care offered to the patient.

Transition of Adolescents With Severe Asthma From Pediatric to Adult Care in Spain: The STAR Consensus

Objective: To assess the degree of consensus among a multidisciplinary expert panel on the transition of adolescents with severe asthma from pediatric to adult care. Methods: A 61-item survey was developed based on guidelines for other chronic diseases, covering transition planning, preparation, effective transfer, and follow-up. A 2-round Delphi process assessed the degree of consensus among 98 experts (49 pediatricians, 24 allergists, and 25 pulmonologists). Consensus was established with ≥70% agreement. Results: Consensus was reached for 42 items (70%). Panelists were unable to agree on an age range for initiation of transition. The main goal during the transition identified by the experts is for adolescents to gain autonomy in managing severe asthma and prescribed treatments. The panelists agreed on the importance of developing an individualized plan, promoting patient autonomy, and identifying factors associated with the home environment. They agreed that the adult health care team should have expertise in severe asthma, biologics, and management of adolescent patients. Pediatric and adult health care teams should share clinical information, agree on the criteria for maintaining biological therapy, and have an on-site joint visit with the patient before the effective transfer. Adult health care professionals should closely follow the patient after the effective transfer to ensure correct inhaler technique, adherence, and attendance at health care appointments. Conclusions: This consensus document provides the first roadmap for Spanish pediatric and adult teams to ensure that key aspects of the transition process in severe asthma are covered. The implementation of these recommendations will improve the quality of care offered to the patient (AU)

Objetivo: Evaluar el grado de consenso con un panel multidisciplinar de expertos sobre la transición del adolescente con asma grave de los servicios de pediatría a atención de adultos. Métodos: Se elaboró un cuestionario de 61 ítems basado en recomendaciones de transición para otras patologías crónicas, abarcando la planificación de la transición, preparación, transferencia efectiva y seguimiento. Se evaluó el nivel de consenso entre 98 expertos (49 pediatras, 24 alergólogos y 25 neumólogos) mediante un proceso Delphi de dos rondas. El consenso se estableció con un acuerdo ≥70%. Resultados: Cuarenta y dos ítems (70%) alcanzaron consenso. Los panelistas no alcanzaron consenso en el rango de edad para iniciar la transición. El principal objetivo a conseguir durante la transición según los expertos fue que el adolescente gane autonomía en el manejodel asma grave y tratamientos prescritos. Asimismo, alcanzaron acuerdo en la importancia de desarrollar un plan individualizado, promover la autonomía del paciente e identificar los factores clave en el entorno familiar. Los especialistas de adultos deben tener experiencia en asma grave y tratamientos biológicos, así como en el manejo de pacientes adolescentes. Los equipos sanitarios de pediatría y de adultos deben compartir la información clínica, consensuar los criterios para mantener la terapia biológica y realizar una visita conjunta con el paciente antes de la transferencia. Los especialistas de adultos deben realizar un seguimiento estrecho del paciente tras la transferencia para asegurar una correcta técnica inhalatoria, el cumplimiento del tratamiento y la asistencia a las citas sanitarias. Conclusiones: Este documento de consenso proporciona la primera hoja de ruta en España para que los equipos especialistas de pediatría y adultos garanticen aspectos clave del proceso de transición en pacientes adolescentes con asma grave. La aplicación de estas (AU)

From rhinitis to asthma: Is small airway disfunction the clue?

No disponible

Exhaled nitric oxide in school children: Searching for the lost variability

OBJECTIVE: The factors including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis - which influence FeNO values in a general population of school children have been studied in order to know to what extent the variability of those values can be explained. METHODS: FeNO was measured in a population of 240 school children aged 6-12 years by means of a Niox-Mino(TM) device in a standardised way. Parents filled in an ISAAC-validated questionnaire of symptoms and environmental factors. Diagnoses were checked against clinical records. Height and weight were measured. A multivariate regression analysis including all variables in the questionnaire was performed, which was followed by two Xi stepwise tests in order to build a predictive model which included the main variables influencing FeNO values. RESULTS: Among the 240 children, 10 suffered from asthma, 16 from rhinoconjunctivitis and 15 from both conditions. FeNO values (GM ± GSD) in children with rhinoconjunctivitis (19.61 ± 1.20 ppb), with asthma (18.62 ± 1.32 ppb), and with both conditions (17.62 ± 1.19 ppb) tended to be significantly higher than control children (11.42 ± 1.04 ppb), p = 0.0016, p = 0.08 and p = 0.01, respectively. The different predictive models were able to explain only 20-27% of FeNO variability. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of FeNO inter-individual variability which can be explained by individual (including suffering from asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis), family, and environmental factors is very low (20-27%). This could have implications on the usefulness of FeNO as a diagnostic tool in asthma

No disponible

Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual / Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: La identificación adecuada del paciente pediátrico con asma grave es esencial para su correcto manejo. Sin embargo, los criterios para definir el asma grave y las recomendaciones para su control varían mucho entre las distintas guías. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se elaboró una encuesta telemática para analizar las opiniones relativas a la definición y control del asma grave pediátrica. Para lograr un consenso se siguió una metodología Delphi modificada. Con los resultados se elaboraron recomendaciones prácticas. RESULTADOS: El cuestionario fue respondido por 11 neumólogos y alergólogos pediátricos expertos en asma grave. Hubo consenso en 50 de los 65 ítems planteados (76,92%). Se consideró que un paciente tiene asma grave si en el último año ha requerido 2 o más ciclos de corticoides orales, si requiere tratamiento diario con corticoides inhalados a dosis medias (con otra medicación controladora) o dosis altas (con o sin otra medicación controladora), si no responde a un tratamiento convencional optimizado, o si la enfermedad pone en riesgo su vida o deteriora gravemente su calidad de vida. La definición de asma grave también podría incluir a los pacientes que consumen recursos sanitarios de manera regular y justificada, o tienen factores psicosociales o ambientales que impiden su control. Para la monitorización, se recomienda usar cuestionarios específicos de población pediátrica (CAN o ACT). Respecto al tratamiento, se debería considerar el uso de omalizumab en un escalón anterior al de los corticoides orales. CONCLUSIONES: El presente trabajo ofrece recomendaciones consensuadas que pueden ser de utilidad en el manejo del asma grave pediátrica

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma

[Consensus-based approach for severe paediatric asthma in routine clinical practice]. / Consenso para el abordaje del asma grave pediátrica en la práctica clínica habitual.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of paediatric patients with severe asthma is essential for an adequate management of the disease. However, criteria for defining severe asthma and recommendations for control vary among different guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted to explore expert opinions about the definition and management of severe paediatric asthma. To reach a consensus agreement, a modified Delphi technique was used, and practice guidelines were prepared after the analysis of the results. RESULTS: Eleven paediatric chest disease physicians and allergy specialists with wide expertise in severe asthma responded to the survey. Consensus was reached in 50 out of 65 questions (76.92%). It was considered that a patient has severe asthma if during the previous year they have required 2 or more cycles of oral steroids, required daily treatment with medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (with other controller medication) or high doses (with or without other controller medication), did not respond to optimised conventional treatment, or if the disease threatened the life of the patient or seriously impairs their quality of life. The definition of severe asthma may also include patients who justifiably use health resources on a regular basis, or have psychosocial or environmental factors impeding control. For monitoring, the use of questionnaires designed specifically for paediatric population, such as CAN or ACT, is recommended. As regards treatment, the use of omalizumab should be considered prior to the use of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides consensus recommendations that may be useful in the management of severe paediatric asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide in school children: Searching for the lost variability.

OBJECTIVE: The factors - including asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis - which influence FeNO values in a general population of school children have been studied in order to know to what extent the variability of those values can be explained. METHODS: FeNO was measured in a population of 240 school children aged 6-12 years by means of a Niox-Mino™ device in a standardised way. Parents filled in an ISAAC-validated questionnaire of symptoms and environmental factors. Diagnoses were checked against clinical records. Height and weight were measured. A multivariate regression analysis including all variables in the questionnaire was performed, which was followed by two Xi stepwise tests in order to build a predictive model which included the main variables influencing FeNO values. RESULTS: Among the 240 children, 10 suffered from asthma, 16 from rhinoconjunctivitis and 15 from both conditions. FeNO values (GM±GSD) in children with rhinoconjunctivitis (19.61±1.20ppb), with asthma (18.62±1.32ppb), and with both conditions (17.62±1.19ppb) tended to be significantly higher than control children (11.42±1.04ppb), p=0.0016, p=0.08 and p=0.01, respectively. The different predictive models were able to explain only 20-27% of FeNO variability. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of FeNO inter-individual variability which can be explained by individual (including suffering from asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis), family, and environmental factors is very low (20-27%). This could have implications on the usefulness of FeNO as a diagnostic tool in asthma.

Identifying severe asthma in pediatrics: The glass half full or half empty

No disponible

Ictiosis arlequín / Harlequin ichthyosis

No disponible

Anales de Pediatría: ayer, hoy y mañana / Anales de Pediatría: The past, the present and the future

No disponible

Asociación entre la exposición a paracetamol y el asma: estado de la cuestión y recomendaciones prácticas / Association between paracetamol exposure and asthma: update and practice guidelines

La prevalencia del asma ha aumentado en las últimas décadas, especialmente en los países desarrollados, por motivos no bien esclarecidos. En los últimos años se ha observado una asociación entre el uso de paracetamol en distintas etapas de la vida, incluyendo la gestación y la infancia, y la prevalencia de asma. El carácter observacional de los estudios publicados no permite establecer una relación causal. Sería necesario realizar ensayos clínicos para comprobar la naturaleza de la asociación, que podría deberse a la presencia de diversos factores de confusión. Las sociedades pediátricas españolas firmantes de este artículo consideran que los datos disponibles hasta la fecha no son suficientes para desaconsejar el uso de paracetamol durante la gestación ni en niños asmáticos o con riesgo de asma (AU)

Asthma prevalence has increased over the last few decades, especially in developed countries, and possibly due to different reasons. An association between paracetamol use or exposure at different periods of life, including gestation and childhood, and asthma prevalence has been observed in the last few years. Causality can not be established from observational reports, due to the arguable presence of many confounding factors and biases. Randomised trials are needed to elucidate the nature of this association. The Spanish Paediatric societies subscribing to this paper consider that current evidence is insufficient to discourage the use of paracetamol during gestation or in children with or at risk of asthma (AU)

Crisis asmática en los servicios de urgencias en Espa˜na, ¿cuál es nuestra práctica habitual? / Asthma crisis in emergency departments in Spain: what is our usual practice?

Introducción: A pesar de la existencia de múltiples guías y documentos de consenso sobre el asma, persiste todavía una gran variabilidad en su abordaje, situación poco analizada en los Servicios de Urgencias (SU). Objetivo: Describir el manejo habitual de las crisis asmáticas en los SU españoles, conocer el grado de variabilidad entre sus diferentes profesionales y analizar los factores que pueden influir en su manejo. Material y métodos: Se elaboró un cuestionario, basado en supuestos clínicos, que se distribuyó entre los socios de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría y asistentes a la reunión en 2011. Resultados: Se analizan 300 encuestas. En 190 casos, el lugar de trabajo habitual es un hospital de tercer nivel. Existe una alta coincidencia en la valoración de la gravedad de los casos. Más del 90% utiliza beta 2 agonistas inhalados en la crisis asmática leve, el 75,3% utiliza corticoides orales en crisis moderadas y el 79% utiliza bromuro de ipratropio en las crisis graves. El 98% considera importante hacer educación terapéutica en los SU. Solo 8 (2,7%) utilizan la medición del pico de flujo espiratorio máximo. Los encuestados que trabajan en un hospital de tercer nivel utilizan con más frecuencia escalas de gravedad (90,5% vs. 80%, p = 0,009) y administran corticoides parenterales con menos frecuencia (53,2% vs. 66,4%, p = 0,017). Conclusiones: Aunque un porcentaje elevado de pediatras que trabajan en los SU siguen las guías de práctica clínica, se han detectado aspectos en los que el abordaje del asma es discordante entre los diferentes profesionales(AU)

Background: Despite there being various guidelines and consensus statements on asthma, great variability still exists in its treatment approach; although this has been little discussed in Emergency Departments (ED). Objective: To describe the usual management of asthma exacerbations in Spanish ED, and to determine the degree of variability among different professionals, as well as analyse factors that may influence their management. Material and methods: A questionnaire was developed based on clinical cases, which was distributed among members of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Emergencies and attendees at the meeting in 2011. Results: A total of 300 surveys were analysed. In 190 cases the place of work was in a tertiary care hospital. There was high agreement in the assessment of the severity of the cases mentioned. Over 90% use inhaled beta 2 agonists in mild asthma exacerbations, 75.3% used oral corticosteroids in moderate exacerbations, and 79% use ipratropium bromide in severe exacerbations. Almost all (98%) considered Therapeutic Education important in the Emergency Department. Only 8 (2.7%) used peak expiratory flow measurements. Respondents working in a tertiary hospital used severity scales more frequently (90.5% vs 80%, P=0.009) and administered parenteral corticosteroids less frequently (53.2% vs 66.4%, P=0.017). Conclusions: Although a high percentage of paediatricians working in the ED follow Clinical Practice Guidelines, some different points of the approach among professionals have been identified(AU)