Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 104(24): 10631-10640, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180171

ABSTRACT

The removal of antibiotics from the feeds used in the livestock industry has resulted in the use of a wide range of alternative antimicrobial products that aim to deliver the productivity and health benefits that have traditionally been associated with antibiotics. Amongst the most popular alternatives are phytogenic product-based extracts from herbs and spices with known antimicrobial properties. Despite embracing such alternatives, the industry is still largely unaware of modes of action, their overall effects on animal health, and interactions with other feed additives such as probiotics. To address some of these issues, three phytogenic products were selected and their interactions with caecal microbiota of layers, grown under six different production systems, were investigated in vitro. Caecal microbiotas were grown with and without phytogenic products, and the changes in microbiota composition were monitored by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Phytogenic products and production system both significantly influenced microbiota composition. The three phytogenic products all altered the relative abundance of species within the Lactobacillus genus, by promoting the growth of some and inhibiting other Lactobacillus species. There were also significant alterations in the Bacillus genus. This was further investigated by comparing the effects of the phytogenic products on the growth of a commercially used Bacillus-based probiotic. The phytogens affected the probiotic mix differently, with some promoting the growth of Bacillus sp. at lower phytogenic concentrations, and fully suppressing growth at higher concentrations, indicating the importance of finding an optimal concentration that can control pathogens while promoting beneficial bacteria. KEY POINTS: • After removal of antibiotics from animal feed, urgent solutions for pathogen control were needed. • Alternative products entered the market without much knowledge on their effects on animal health. • Probiotic products are used in combination with phytogens despite the possible incompatibility.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Probiotics , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
2.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 103(21-22): 8977-8985, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630239

ABSTRACT

The Australian saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) industry began commercially in the 1980s, producing skins for export and crocodile meat as a by-product. Industry research has thus far focused on strategies to improve production efficiency. In the current study, we utilised 16S rRNA sequencing to characterise the intestinal microbiome of Australian saltwater crocodiles. Samples were collected from 13 commercially farmed crocodiles from six sample sites along the length of the intestinal tract. The results indicate a similar microbiome composition to that found in the freshwater alligator, with the dominate phyla represented by Firmicutes, primarily Clostridia, and Fusobacteria, which appears to be distinct from mammalian, fish, and other reptile phyla which are generally dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The high abundance of 'pathogenic' bacteria, with no apparent consequence to the host's health, is of great interest and warrants further additional investigation. This will enable expansion of the current understanding of host immune function and how it is modified by host and intestinal microbiome interactions.


Subject(s)
Alligators and Crocodiles/microbiology , Clostridiales/isolation & purification , Fusobacteria/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Intestines/microbiology , Animals , Australia , Base Sequence , Clostridiales/classification , Clostridiales/genetics , Fusobacteria/classification , Fusobacteria/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
3.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0214471, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30943226

ABSTRACT

Increased global regulation and restrictions on the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in the poultry industry means that there is a need to identify alternatives that prevent infection while still conveying the growth and performance benefits afforded by their use. Biochars are produced by the incomplete pyrolysis of organic materials, with reports of use as a feed supplement and activity against pathogenic bacteria. In the current study the dose-dependent effects of biochar dietary inclusion in layer diets at 1%, 2% and 4% w/w were investigated to determine a) the efficacy of biochar as an anti-pathogenic additive on the intestinal microbiota and b) the optimal inclusion level. Biochar inclusion for anti-pathogenic effects was found to be most beneficial at 2% w/w. Poultry pathogens such as Gallibacterium anatis and campylobacters, including Campylobacter hepaticus, were found to be significantly lower in biochar fed birds. A shift in microbiota was also associated with the incorporation of 2% w/w biochar in the feed in two large scale trials on two commercial layer farms. Biochar inclusion for anti-pathogenic effects was found to be most beneficial at 2% w/w. Differential effects of the timing of biochar administration (supplementation beginning at hatch or at point of lay) were also evident, with greater impact on community microbial structure at 48 weeks of age when birds were fed from hatch rather than supplemented at point of lay.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , Campylobacter , Charcoal/chemistry , Liver Diseases/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Animal Nutrition Sciences , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/prevention & control , Chickens/microbiology , Dietary Supplements , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Liver Diseases/microbiology , Liver Diseases/prevention & control , Microbiota , Poultry Diseases/microbiology
4.
Microbiol Res ; 195: 24-30, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28024523

ABSTRACT

According to the World Health Organisation, antibiotics are rapidly losing potency in every country of the world. Poultry are currently perceived as a major source of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. There is an urgent need for new and natural ways to control pathogens in poultry and humans alike. Porous, cation rich, aluminosilicate minerals, zeolites can be used as a feed additive in poultry rations, demonstrating multiple productivity benefits. Next generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA marker gene was used to phylogenetically characterize the fecal microbiota and thus investigate the ability and dose dependency of zeolite in terms of anti-pathogenic effects. A natural zeolite was used as a feed additive in laying hens at 1, 2, and 4% w/w for a 23 week period. At the end of this period cloacal swabs were collected to sample faecal microbial communities. A significant reduction in carriage of bacteria within the phylum Proteobacteria, especially in members of the pathogen-rich family Enterobacteriaceae, was noted across all three concentrations of zeolite. Zeolite supplementation of feed resulted in a reduction in the carriage of a number of poultry pathogens without disturbing beneficial bacteria. This effect was, in some phylotypes, correlated with the zeolite concentration. This result is relevant to zeolite feeding in other animal production systems, and for human pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Zeolites/administration & dosage , Animals , Bacterial Load , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Treatment Outcome
5.
PLoS One ; 11(4): e0154061, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27116607

ABSTRACT

A range of feed supplements, including antibiotics, have been commonly used in poultry production to improve health and productivity. Alternative methods are needed to suppress pathogen loads and maintain productivity. As an alternative to antibiotics use, we investigated the ability of biochar, bentonite and zeolite as separate 4% feed additives, to selectively remove pathogens without reducing microbial richness and diversity in the gut. Neither biochar, bentonite nor zeolite made any significant alterations to the overall richness and diversity of intestinal bacterial community. However, reduction of some bacterial species, including some potential pathogens was detected. The microbiota of bentonite fed animals were lacking all members of the order Campylobacterales. Specifically, the following operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were absent: an OTU 100% identical to Campylobacter jejuni; an OTU 99% identical to Helicobacter pullorum; multiple Gallibacterium anatis (>97%) related OTUs; Bacteroides dorei (99%) and Clostridium aldenense (95%) related OTUs. Biochar and zeolite treatments had similar but milder effects compared to bentonite. Zeolite amended feed was also associated with significant reduction in the phylum Proteobacteria. All three additives showed potential for the control of major poultry zoonotic pathogens.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Bentonite/pharmacology , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , Campylobacter/drug effects , Charcoal/pharmacology , Chickens/microbiology , Zeolites/pharmacology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/prevention & control , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Organic Agriculture
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...