Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cytometry ; 42(2): 95-105, 2000 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10797446

ABSTRACT

A biannual external quality assurance (EQA) scheme for flow cytometric typing of the HLA-B27 antigen is operational in The Netherlands and Belgium since 1995. We report here on the results of the first seven send-outs to which 36 to 47 laboratories participated. With the send-out, four specimens from blood bank donors, who had been typed for HLA Class I antigens by complement-dependent cytotoxicity, were distributed. Subtyping of the HLA-B27 allele was performed by PCR-SSP. Ten samples were HLA-B27(pos) (all HLA-B*2705) and 18 were HLA-B27(neg). For flow cytometry, the most widely monoclonal antibody (MoAb) used was FD705, followed by GS145.2 and ABC-m3. The majority of laboratories used more than 1 anti-HLA-B27 MoAb for typing. The HLA-B27(pos) samples were correctly classified as positive by the large majority of participants (median 95%; range 85% to 100% per send out); some participants considered further typing necessary and misclassification as negative was only sporadically seen. The classification of HLA-B27(neg) samples as negative was less straightforward. Ten samples were correctly classified as such by 97% (82% to 100%) of the participants, whereas 64% (range 53% to 70%) of the participants classified the remaining eight samples as HLA-B27(neg). There was no significant prevalence of a particular HLA-B allele among these eight "poor concordancy" samples as compared to the ten "good concordancy" samples. Inspection of the reactivity patterns of the individual MoAb with HLA-B27(neg) samples revealed that ABC-m3 showed very little cross-reactivity apart from its well-known cross-reactivity with HLA-B7, whereas the cross-reactivity patterns of GS145.2 and FD705 were more extensive. The small sample size (n = 18) and the distribution of HLA-B alleles other than HLA-B27 did not allow assignment of specificities to these cross-reactions. Finally, we showed that standardized interpretation of the combined results of two anti-HLA-B27 MoAb reduced the frequency of false-positive conclusions on HLA-B27(neg) samples. In this series, the lowest frequency of false-positive assignments was observed with the combination of the FD705 and ABC-m3 MoAb.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Flow Cytometry/standards , HLA-B27 Antigen/analysis , HLA-B27 Antigen/immunology , Belgium , Cross Reactions , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Netherlands , Quality Control , Reference Standards
2.
Diabetes ; 41(12): 1570-4, 1992 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1446798

ABSTRACT

The goal of the Fourth International Workshop for Standardization of ICA Measurements was to determine the specificity of ICA assays and their ability to distinguish between control sera (n = 57) and sera from IDDM-related individuals--representing relatives of IDDM patients (n = 21), healthy individuals who later developed IDDM (n = 8), or newly diagnosed IDDM patients (n = 23). Results from 28 laboratories were analyzed. The mean specificity (percentage of control sera reported as negative) among 27 laboratories was 91%, including 6 laboratories with 100% specificity. Nevertheless, 78% of laboratories found at least one control sample > 0 JDF U. Among samples from first-degree relatives, the mean concordance was 86%, including three sera found negative (0 JDF U) by all laboratories. Among individuals who later developed diabetes, the mean concordance was 93%, with two sera found positive by 100% of laboratories. In sera from newly diagnosed IDDM patients, the mean concordance was 82%. Three sera were found positive and one serum negative by all laboratories. The JDF U of the sera considered to be positive were significantly greater than each laboratory's average for the controls. In conclusion, the results from laboratories participating in the Fourth International ICA Workshop demonstrated excellent specificity, good concordance, and an ability to separate control sera from defined, IDDM-related subjects.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/analysis , Autoantibodies/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Diabetes Mellitus/immunology , Islets of Langerhans/immunology , Animals , Diabetes Mellitus/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Haplorhini , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Islets of Langerhans/cytology , Islets of Langerhans/pathology , Papio , Rats , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...