Impact of adjuvants on CD4(+) T cell and B cell responses to a protein antigen vaccine: Results from a phase II, randomized, multicenter trial.

Immunogenicity and safety of different adjuvants combined with a model antigen (HBsAg) were compared. Healthy HBV-naïve adults were randomized to receive HBs adjuvanted with alum or Adjuvant Systems AS01B, AS01E, AS03A or AS04 at Days 0 and 30. Different frequencies of HBs-specific CD4+ T cells 14days post dose 2 but similar polyfunctionality profiles were induced by the different adjuvants with frequencies significantly higher in the AS01B and AS01E groups than in the other groups. Antibody concentrations 30days post-dose 2 were significantly higher in AS01B, AS01E and AS03A than in other groups. Limited correlations were observed between HBs-specific CD4+ T cell and antibody responses. Injection site pain was the most common solicited local symptom and was more frequent in AS groups than in alum group. Different adjuvants formulated with the same antigen induced different adaptive immune responses and reactogenicity patterns in healthy naïve adults. The results summary for this study (GSK study number 112115 - NCT# NCT00805389) is available on the GSK Clinical Study Register and can be accessed at www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com.

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational 4-component Staphylococcus aureus vaccine with or without AS03B adjuvant: Results of a randomized phase I trial.

We assessed the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a staphylococcal vaccine combining capsular polysaccharides types 5 and 8 (CPS5/8), conjugated to tetanus toxoid (TT), with mutated detoxified α-toxin (AT) and clumping factor A (ClfA). In this phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind trial (NCT01160172), 88 healthy 18- to 40-year-olds received CPS5-TT/CPS8-TT/AT/ClfA vaccine (5/5/10/10 µg or 10/10/30/30 µg dose, each with or without AS03B adjuvant) or saline, at months 0, 1, 6. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 d post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Humoral and antigen-specific CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell immunity were assessed from Day (D) 0 to D540 post-vaccination. The most frequently reported solicited local and general AEs were pain (78.6%-100% of subjects), fatigue (36.4%-93.3% of subjects post-dose 1-2) and headache (20%-44.4% of subjects post-dose 3). Overall, 4 SAEs and 2 potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) (none fatal or vaccine-related) were reported. For each antigen, pre-vaccination seropositivity rates were high (85.7%-100%) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in vaccine recipients sharply increased from D0 to D14, then plateaued to study end. Exploratory group comparisons suggested higher GMCs with higher dosage, without AS03B effect. Vaccine-induced antibodies were functional (CPS5 opsonophagocytic assays, and AT/ClfA inhibition assays). AT- and ClfA-specific CD4(+) T-cells with Th0/Th1 cytokine profile were induced at low levels (median <0.05%) by each formulation (intracellular cytokine staining). In conclusion, no safety concerns were identified and each vaccine formulation induced robust humoral immune responses after the first vaccine dose.

Vaccine Adjuvant Systems containing monophosphoryl lipid A and QS-21 induce strong humoral and cellular immune responses against hepatitis B surface antigen which persist for at least 4 years after vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was used as a model antigen to evaluate persistence of cellular and humoral immune responses when formulated with three different Adjuvant Systems containing 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and QS-21, in an oil-in-water emulsion (AS02B and AS02V), or with liposomes (AS01B). METHODS: This is an open, 4-year follow-up of a previous randomised, double-blind study. Healthy subjects aged 18-40 years received three vaccine doses on a month 0, 1, 10 schedule and were initially followed for 18 months. A total of 93 subjects (AS02B: n=30; AS02V: n=28; AS01B: n=35) were enrolled in this follow-up and had an additional blood sample taken at Year 4 (NCT02153320). The primary endpoint was the frequency of HBsAg-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells expressing cytokines upon short-term in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with HBsAg-derived peptides. Secondary endpoints were anti-HBs antibody titres and frequency of HBsAg-specific memory B-cells. RESULTS: A strong and persistent specific CD4(+) T-cell response was observed at Year 4 in all groups. HBsAg-specific CD4(+) T-cells expressed mainly CD40L and IL-2, and to a lesser extent TNF-α and IFN-γ. HBsAg-specific CD8(+) T-cells were not detected in any group. A high, persistent HBsAg-specific humoral immune response was observed in all groups, with all subjects seroprotected (antibody titre ≥10mIU/mL) at Year 4. The geometric mean antibody titre at Year 4 was above 100,000mIU/mL in all groups. A strong memory B-cell response was observed post-dose 2, which tended to increase post-dose 3 and persisted at Year 4 in all groups. CONCLUSION: The MPL/QS-21/HBsAg vaccine formulations induced persistent immune responses up to 4 years after first vaccination. These Adjuvant Systems offer potential for combination with recombinant, synthetic or highly purified subunit vaccines, particularly for vaccination against challenging diseases, or in specific populations, although additional studies are needed.

Adjuvant system AS02V enhances humoral and cellular immune responses to pneumococcal protein PhtD vaccine in healthy young and older adults: randomised, controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The protection elicited by polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines against community-acquired pneumonia in older adults remains debatable. Alternative vaccine targets include well-conserved pneumococcal protein antigens, such as pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses and safety/reactogenicity following immunisation with PhtD vaccine with or without adjuvant (alum or AS02V) in older (≥65 years) and young (18-45 years) healthy adults. METHODS: Two phase I/II, single-blind, parallel-group studies were conducted in 150 older and 147 young adults. Participants were randomised to receive 2 doses (months 0 and 2) of PhtD 30 µg, PhtD 10 µg plus alum, PhtD 30 µg plus alum, PhtD 10 µg plus AS02V or PhtD 30 µg plus AS02V, or the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (23PPV) at month 0 with placebo (saline solution) at month 2. Safety/reactogenicity was assessed. PhtD-specific antibody, T cell and memory B cell responses were evaluated. RESULTS: Solicited adverse events were more common in young participants and with adjuvanted vaccines. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Although anti-PhtD geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) were consistently lower in the older adult cohort than in young adults, GMCs in the older cohort following PhtD 30 µg plus AS02V were comparable to those induced by plain PhtD or PhtD 30 µg plus alum in the young cohort. Compared with alum adjuvant, AS02V adjuvant system was associated with an increased frequency of PhtD-specific CD4 cells in both cohorts and a significantly higher specific memory B cell response in the older cohort, similar to responses obtained in the young cohort. CONCLUSION: The improved immune response to PhtD vaccine containing the AS02V adjuvant system in comparison to alum suggests that the reduced immune response to vaccines in older adults can be partially restored to the response level observed in young adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00307528/NCT01767402.

Randomized controlled study of the safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccine formulations containing PhtD and detoxified pneumolysin with alum or adjuvant system AS02V in elderly adults.

Six vaccine formulations containing AS02V or alum (aluminum phosphate [AlPO4]) adjuvant with pneumococcal proteins, pneumococcal histidine triad D (PhtD), and/or detoxified pneumolysin (dPly), either as a polysaccharide carrier in an 8-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (8PCV) or as free (unconjugated) proteins, were evaluated in adults -65 to 85 years of age. In this phase I observer-blind study, 167 healthy subjects were randomized to receive two doses (days 0 and 60) of 10 or 30 µg PhtD-dPly plus AS02V or alum, 8PCV plus AS02V or alum, or one dose (day 0) of 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (23PPV) as a control (placebo on day 60). The safety, reactogenicity, and antibody-specific responses to these vaccines were evaluated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The incidences of solicited local and specific general (fatigue and myalgia) symptoms tended to be higher in the AS02V groups than in other groups. Anti-PhtD and anti-Ply antibody responses were observed in all groups except the control group. One month post-dose 2, the anti-PhtD and anti-Ply antibody geometric mean concentrations tended to be higher with AS02V than with alum, higher with a dose of 30 µg than with 10 µg for PhtD-dPly and higher with 30-µg PhtD-dPly formulations than with conjugated PhtD and dPly (8PCV) formulations. Functional antibody responses, measured by an opsonophagocytic activity assay, tended to be higher with 8PCV than with 23PPV. In conclusion, vaccine formulations containing free or conjugated PhtD and dPly had acceptable reactogenicity and safety profiles in elderly adults. Immune responses were enhanced with an AS02V-adjuvanted formulation containing free 30-µg PhtD-dPly compared to those with alum adjuvant and conjugated proteins. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00756067.).

Efficacy of inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A new trivalent inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine (TIV) was recently introduced in the United States. We assessed the efficacy of TIV against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B. METHODS: In this double-blind trial conducted from September 2006 to May 2007 in the Czech Republic and Finland, participants aged 18-64 years were randomized to receive 1 dose of TIV (n = 5103) or placebo (n = 2549). Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) (defined as at least 1 systemic symptom [fever {oral temperature, > or = 37.8 degrees C} and/or myalgia] and at least 1 respiratory symptom [cough and/or sore throat]) were identified by both active (biweekly phone contact) and passive surveillance. Nasal and throat swab specimens were collected for viral culture. RESULTS: The attack rate for culture-confirmed ILI was 3.2% in the placebo group, with most strains identified as influenza A (all except 1 were H3N2) matching the vaccine strain. There were 6 cases of influenza B, all of which were of a different lineage (Yamagata) than the vaccine strain. Vaccine efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B due to strains antigenically matched to the vaccine was 66.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9%-77.4%; P < .001) and to any strain was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-72.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: TIV is efficacious against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00363870.

Challenge of conducting a placebo-controlled randomized efficacy study for influenza vaccine in a season with low attack rate and a mismatched vaccine B strain: a concrete example.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of a trivalent inactivated split virus influenza vaccine (TIV) against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B in adults 18 to 64 years of age during the 2005/2006 season in the Czech Republic. METHODS: 6203 subjects were randomized to receive TIV (N = 4137) or placebo (N = 2066). The sample size was based on an assumed attack rate of 4% which provided 90% power to reject the hypothesis that vaccine efficacy (VE) was > or = 45%. Cases of influenza like illness (defined as fever (oral temperature > or =37.8 degrees C) plus cough and/or sore throat) were identified both by active (biweekly phone contact) and passive (self reporting) surveillance and nasal and throat swabs were collected from subjects for viral culture. RESULTS: TIV was well tolerated and induced a good immune response. The 2005/2006 influenza season was exceptionally mild in the study area, as it was throughout Europe, and only 46 culture-confirmed cases were found in the study cohort (10 influenza A and 36 influenza B). Furthermore among the B isolates, 35 were identified as B/Hong Kong 330/2001-like (B/Victoria/2/87 lineage) which is antigenically unrelated to the vaccine B strain (B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage). The attack rate in the vaccine group (0.7%) was not statistically significantly different from the attack rate in the placebo group (0.9%). CONCLUSION: Due to the atypical nature of the influenza season during this study we were unable to assess TIV efficacy. This experience illustrates the challenge of conducting a prospective influenza vaccine efficacy trial during a single season when influenza attack rates and drift in circulating strains or B virus lineage match can be difficult to estimate in advance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registery: NCT00197223.

Vaccine adjuvant systems containing monophosphoryl lipid A and QS21 induce strong and persistent humoral and T cell responses against hepatitis B surface antigen in healthy adult volunteers.

A randomised, double-blind study assessing the potential of four adjuvants in combination with recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen has been conducted to evaluate humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in healthy adults after three vaccine doses at months 0, 1 and 10. Three Adjuvant Systems (AS) contained 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and QS21, formulated either with an oil-in-water emulsion (AS02B and AS02V) or with liposomes (AS01B). The fourth adjuvant was CpG oligonucleotide. High levels of antibodies were induced by all adjuvants, whereas cell-mediated immune responses, including cytolytic T cells and strong and persistent CD4(+) T cell response were mainly observed with the three MPL/QS21-containing Adjuvant Systems. The CD4(+) T cell response was characterised in vitro by vigorous lymphoproliferation, high IFN-gamma and moderate IL-5 production. Antigen-specific T cell immune response was further confirmed ex vivo by detection of IL-2- and IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) T cells, and in vivo by measuring increased levels of IFN-gamma in the serum and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. The CpG adjuvanted vaccine induced consistently lower immune responses for all parameters. All vaccine adjuvants were shown to be safe with acceptable reactogenicity profiles. The majority of subjects reported local reactions at the injection site after vaccination while general reactions were recorded less frequently. No vaccine-related serious adverse event was reported. Importantly, no increase in markers of auto-immunity and allergy was detected over the whole study course. In conclusion, the Adjuvant Systems containing MPL/QS21, in combination with hepatitis B surface antigen, induced very strong humoral and cellular immune responses in healthy adults. The AS01B-adjuvanted vaccine induced the strongest and most durable specific cellular immune responses after two doses. These Adjuvant Systems, when added to recombinant protein antigens, can be fundamental to develop effective prophylactic vaccines against complex pathogens, e.g. malaria, HIV infection and tuberculosis, and for special target populations such as subjects with an impaired immune response, due to age or medical conditions.