ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate reliability, concurrent validity, and clinical feasibility of measurements assessing volume in patients with lower limb lymphedema (LLL) and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To investigate intra- and interrater reliability, 47 patients with LLL and 30 healthy controls were assessed three times by two assessors. To investigate between session reliability, 50 participants were reassessed two weeks later. Each assessment included measurements of the midline region (hip circumference; suprapubic volume), leg volume (perimeter every 4 cm; Perometer®), and foot volume (water displacement; figure-of-eight method). Concurrent validity was assessed with correlation coefficients. Measurements were timed and practical limitations were reviewed. Clinical trial registration number: NCT: 05269264. RESULTS: Measurements of the total volume of different regions showed weak to very high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.131-998). Absolute and relative volume differences had lower ICC values (0.360-0.976). A strong correlation was found between the total volumes of the same region. The Perometer® and figure-of-eight method were the fastest method for leg and foot volume, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The assessed total volumes might be more valuable in assessing the evolution of volume in bilateral LLL than the calculated absolute and relative differences between both limbs. The Perometer® and figure-of-eight method were the most time efficient for leg and foot volume, respectively.Implications for rehabilitationLymphedema is a chronic condition for which a reliable and clinically feasible assessment of volume is essential for the diagnosis, treatment decisions, and the evaluation of the treatment.This study shows that the total leg/foot volumes were more reliable than the calculated absolute and relative differences between both limbs and could therefore more valuable to evaluate bilateral lower limb lymphedema.For the assessment of leg volume, the Perometer® was the most reliable and fastest method.For the evaluation of the foot volume, the figure-of-eight method was overall the best method.
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: Secondary lymphedema is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating condition with an important impact on quality of life. Lymphedema is a frequently reported complication in oncological surgery but has not been systematically studied in the setting of prostate cancer. (2) Methods: Pubmed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to identify articles reporting on lower limb or genital lymphedema after primary treatment (surgery of radiation therapy) of the prostate and the pelvic lymph nodes in men with prostate cancer. Primary outcome was the prevalence of lower limb and genital lymphedema. (3) Results: Eighteen articles were eligible for qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias was high in all included studies, with only one study providing a prespecified definition of secondary lymphedema. Eleven studies report the prevalence of lower limb (0-14%) and genital (0-1%) lymphedema after radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) Seven studies report a low prevalence of lower limb (0-9%) and genital (0-8%) lymphedema after irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes. However, in the patient subgroups that underwent pelvic irradiation after staging pelvic lymph node dissections, the prevalence of lower limb (18-29%) and genital (2-22%) lymphedema is substantially elevated. (4) Conclusion: Prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery or irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes are at risk of developing secondary lymphedema in the lower limbs and the genital region. Patients receiving pelvic radiation after pelvic lymph node dissection have the highest prevalence of lymphedema. The lack of a uniform definition and standardized diagnostic criteria for lower limb and genital lymphedema hampers the accurate estimation of their true prevalence. Future clinicals trials are needed to specifically evaluate secondary lymphedema in patients undergoing prostate cancer treatments, to identify potential risk factors and to determine the impact on quality of life.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Overall survival rates after rectal cancer have increased. Therefore, functional outcomes rightly deserve more interest. The aims of this study were to assess progression in total, sports, occupational and household physical activity levels of rectal cancer survivors, from preoperatively to 12 months after surgery/stoma closure and to explore predictive factors. METHODS: Multi-center prospective study with 125 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Flemish Physical Activity Computerized Questionnaire was completed concerning all physical activity levels at baseline (past preoperative year) and at 1, 4, 6 and 12 months after surgery/stoma closure. At these timepoints, questionnaires (LARS-/ COREFO-questionnaire) regarding bowel symptoms were also filled out. Results were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: Total physical activity levels up to 12 months remained significantly lower than preoperative. Occupational and sports physical activity levels remained significantly lower until 6 and 4 months postoperative, respectively. Predictive factors for decreased physical activity levels at a specific timepoint were: younger age and no stoma (total physical activity, 1 month), low/mid rectal tumor, no stoma, non-employed status (total, 4 months), higher COREFO-scores (occupational, 4 months) and non-employed status (total, 12 months). At all timepoints, lower COREFO-scores were associated with higher total physical activity levels; male gender and lower educational levels with higher occupational levels; younger age, normal BMI, employed status and adjuvant therapy with higher sports levels; and female gender, lower educational level and unemployed status with higher household levels. CONCLUSIONS: One year after rectal cancer treatment, total physical activity levels were still not recovered. Rectal cancer patients, especially those at risk for decreased physical activity levels and with major bowel complaints, should be identified and guided to increase their activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered at Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR6383 , 23/01/2017).
