HLA class II peptide tetramers vs allergen-induced proliferation for identification of allergen-specific CD4 T cells.

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence-labeled MHC class II/peptide tetramer complexes are considered as optimal tools to characterize allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells, but this technique is restricted to frequently expressed HLA class II molecules and knowledge of immunodominant epitopes. In contrast, allergen-stimulated proliferation assessed by CFSE dilution is less sophisticated and widely applicable. The major mugwort allergen, Art v 1, contains only one single, immunodominant, HLA-DR1-restricted epitope (Art v 125-36 ). Thus, essentially all Art v 1-reactive cells should be identified by a HLA-DRB1*01:01/Art v 119-36 tetramer. METHODS: We compared specificity and sensitivity of tetramer(+) and allergen-induced proliferating (CFSE(lo) ) CD4(+) T cells by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The frequency of tetramer(+) CD4(+) T cells determined ex vivo in PBMC of mugwort-allergic individuals ranged from 0 to 0.029%. After 2-3 weeks of in vitro expansion, sufficient tetramer(+) T cells for phenotyping were detected in 83% of Art v 125-36 -reactive T-cell lines (TCL) from mugwort-allergic individuals, but not in TCL from healthy individuals. The tetramers defined bona fide Th2 cells. Notably, Art v 125-36 -reactive TCL depleted of tetramer(+) T cells still reacted to the peptide, and only 44% of Art v 125-36 -specific T-cell clones were detected by the tetramer. CFSE(lo) CD4(+) T cells contained only 0.3-10.7% of tetramer(+) T cells and very low proportions of Th2 cells. CONCLUSION: Allergen-specific T cells can be identified by HLA class II tetramers with high specificity, but unexpected low sensitivity. In contrast, allergen-stimulated CFSE(lo) CD4(+) T cells contain extremely high fractions of bystander cells. Therefore, for T-cell monitoring, either method should be interpreted with caution.

Flow cytometric analysis of cytokine expression in short-term allergen-stimulated T cells mirrors the phenotype of proliferating T cells in long-term cultures.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific T(H) cells play an important role in IgE-mediated disorders as allergies. Since this T(H) cell-population only accounts for a small percentage of T(H) cells, they are difficult to phenotype without prior selection or expansion. METHODS: Grass-pollen-specific T(H) cell profiles were evaluated in 5 allergic and 4 non-allergic individuals using three different approaches: CD154 expression on ex vivo grass-pollen-activated PBMCs (i); CFSE-dilution in grass-pollen-restimulated PBMCs (ii) and T cell lines enriched for allergen-specific T cells (iii). RESULTS: Relatively low numbers of allergen-specific T(H) cells were detected using CD154 expression, limiting the power to detect phenotypic differences between allergic and non-allergic individuals. In contrast, higher frequencies of proliferating T(H) cells were detected by loss-of-CFSE intensity in PBMCs and TCLs after grass-pollen-stimulation, resulting in the detection of significantly more IL-4 producing T(H) cells in allergic vs non-allergic individuals. In addition, higher numbers of IFNγ producing T(H) cells were detected in long-term cultures compared to the CD154 expressing T(H) cells. CONCLUSION: To detect allergen-specific T(H) cells for a common allergen as grass-pollen, expansion is not absolutely necessary, although within 8-day grass-pollen cultures, higher numbers of proliferating T(H) cells resulted in increased statistical power to detect phenotypic differences. However, this approach also detects more bystander activated T(H) cells. TCLs resulted in comparable percentages of cytokine expressing T cells as 8-day cultures. Therefore enrichment can be necessary for detection of T(H) cells specific for a single allergen or allergen-derived peptides, but is dispensable for the detection and phenotyping of allergen-specific T(H) cells using crude extracts.