Patient satisfaction after EDOF intraocular lens implantation in vitrectomized eyes.

PURPOSE: To report patient satisfaction after unilateral/bilateral extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a young population after vitrectomy. METHODS: Patients that underwent phaco-vitrectomy or phaco following vitrectomy with an AT LARA EDOF IOL, aged between 18 and 75 years, were asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess overall visual quality, near vision quality, and visual disturbances. The questionnaire was based on the Catquest, NAVQ, and APPLES questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (average age 56.7 years) filled out the questionnaire of which 53.9% received a unilateral EDOF IOL. The most common indications for vitrectomy were retinal detachments (38.2%), floaters (36.0%), and epiretinal membranes (16.9%). The Catquest and NAVQ score respectively showed a good overall satisfaction (3.44/4.0), a good intermediate vision (3.55/4.0), and an average near vision (2.75/4.0). The APPLES score showed acceptable visual disturbances. There were no differences between the unilateral and bilateral group, except for a higher spectacle dependency in the unilateral group (40% vs. 10.6%). Participants that underwent vitrectomy in case of floaters reported lower satisfaction rates. Other variables, like the pre-operative refraction, had no impact on both satisfaction and visual disturbances. CONCLUSION: Both unilateral and bilateral implantation of the AT LARA EDOF IOL showed a high satisfaction with no differences between both groups, except for a lower spectacle use in the latter. Hence, The AT LARA seems to be a possible choice in patients undergoing vitrectomy at a younger age, even for unilateral use.

Screening for Intracranial Aneurysms in Individuals with a Positive First-Degree Family History: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to rupture of an intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a devastating condition with high morbidity and mortality. Individuals with a positive family history of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) or IA can have an increased risk for aSAH or IA themselves. Screening is currently recommended in families with ≥2 affected first-degree relatives. We sought to assess the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of IA screening in individuals with a positive first-degree family history, relative to the number of family members affected. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar and identified additional studies by reviewing reference lists. Only original studies and review papers were considered. We excluded genetic diseases associated with IA and studies with unclear data concerning the number of first-versus second-degree relatives affected. RESULTS: This review included 37 articles. Individuals with ≥2 affected first-degree relatives had a greater prevalence of IA (average 13.1% vs. 3% in the general population). Similarly, we found a greater prevalence of IA in individuals with ≥1 affected first-degree relative (average 4.8%, up to 19% in individuals with additional risk factors). The risk of aSAH also was increased in both categories. Recent studies stressed the importance of serial screening over time and suggested that such screening can be cost-effective in persons with only one first-degree relative with IA or aSAH. CONCLUSIONS: While current guidelines do not recommend screening individuals with ≥1 first-degree relative affected, we found strong arguments in favor of this approach.