Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Imaging ; 24(1): 60, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study systematically compares the impact of innovative deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR, TrueFidelity) to conventionally used iterative reconstruction (IR) on nodule volumetry and subjective image quality (IQ) at highly reduced radiation doses. This is essential in the context of low-dose CT lung cancer screening where accurate volumetry and characterization of pulmonary nodules in repeated CT scanning are indispensable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized CT dataset was established using an anthropomorphic chest phantom (Lungman, Kyoto Kaguku Inc., Kyoto, Japan) containing a set of 3D-printed lung nodules including six diameters (4 to 9 mm) and three morphology classes (lobular, spiculated, smooth), with an established ground truth. Images were acquired at varying radiation doses (6.04, 3.03, 1.54, 0.77, 0.41 and 0.20 mGy) and reconstructed with combinations of reconstruction kernels (soft and hard kernel) and reconstruction algorithms (ASIR-V and DLIR at low, medium and high strength). Semi-automatic volumetry measurements and subjective image quality scores recorded by five radiologists were analyzed with multiple linear regression and mixed-effect ordinal logistic regression models. RESULTS: Volumetric errors of nodules imaged with DLIR are up to 50% lower compared to ASIR-V, especially at radiation doses below 1 mGy and when reconstructed with a hard kernel. Also, across all nodule diameters and morphologies, volumetric errors are commonly lower with DLIR. Furthermore, DLIR renders higher subjective IQ, especially at the sub-mGy doses. Radiologists were up to nine times more likely to score the highest IQ-score to these images compared to those reconstructed with ASIR-V. Lung nodules with irregular margins and small diameters also had an increased likelihood (up to five times more likely) to be ascribed the best IQ scores when reconstructed with DLIR. CONCLUSION: We observed that DLIR performs as good as or even outperforms conventionally used reconstruction algorithms in terms of volumetric accuracy and subjective IQ of nodules in an anthropomorphic chest phantom. As such, DLIR potentially allows to lower the radiation dose to participants of lung cancer screening without compromising accurate measurement and characterization of lung nodules.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Lung Neoplasms , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Pulmonary Nodules/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 195(3-4): 158-163, 2021 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33723584

ABSTRACT

This study's aim was to assess whether deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) techniques are non-inferior to ASIR-V for the clinical task of pulmonary nodule detection in chest computed tomography. Up to 6 (range 3-6, mean 4.2) artificial lung nodules (diameter: 3, 5, 8 mm; density: -800, -630, +100 HU) were inserted at different locations in the Kyoto Kagaku Lungman phantom. In total, 16 configurations (10 abnormal, 6 normal) were scanned at 7.6, 3, 1.6 and 0.38 mGy CTDIvol (respectively 0, 60, 80 and 95% dose reduction). Images were reconstructed using 50% ASIR-V and a deep learning-based algorithm with low (DL-L), medium (DL-M) and high (DL-H) strength. Four chest radiologists evaluated 256 series by locating and scoring nodules on a five-point scale. No statistically significant difference was found among the reconstruction algorithms (p = 0.987, average across readers AUC: 0.555, 0.561, 0.557, 0.558 for ASIR-V, DL-L, DL-M, DL-H).


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Algorithms , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 136: 787-808, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27430442

ABSTRACT

Degenerative disease of the spine, in the form of intervertebral disc degeneration and bony growth, causing osteophytes and impinging upon the spinal canal and neural foramina, is the most frequent disorder affecting the spine. In this chapter we first discuss briefly the indications for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in suspected degenerative spine disease. We then describe changes of disc height, signal intensity, and disc contour with aging and repeated microtrauma, as well as the imaging techniques most appropriate to image them. A grading system for lumbar disc changes is provided. Stenosis of the canal and neural foramina is reviewed next, concluding with a description of degenerative changes affecting the vertebral endplates and bone marrow.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic/standards , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...