Reconstruction of Acquired Defects of the External Genitalia: A 24-Patient, Single-Institution Experience.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing resection of the external genitalia are often faced with significant deformity and decreased quality of life. Plastic surgeons are tasked with the challenge of reconstructing these defects to minimize morbidity and increase patients' quality of life. The authors have set out to investigate the efficacy of local fasciocutaneous and pedicled perforator flaps in external genital reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing reconstruction of acquired defects of the external genitalia from 2017 to 2021. In total, 24 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Patients were allocated into 2 cohorts: patients with defects reconstructed using local fasciocutaneous flaps (FF) versus patients with defects reconstructed using pedicled islandized perforator flaps (PF). Comorbid conditions, ablative procedures, operative times, flap size, and complications were compared across all groups. Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences in comorbidities, while independent t tests were used to analyze age, body mass index, operative time, and flap size. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients included in the study, 6 underwent reconstruction with islandized PFs (either profunda artery perforator or anterolateral thigh), and 18 underwent reconstruction with FFs. The most common indication for reconstruction was vulvectomy for vulvar cancer, followed by radical debridement for infection, and lastly penectomy for penile cancer. The PF cohort had a significantly higher percentage of previously irradiated patients (50% vs 11.1%, P = 0.019). Although mean flap size was larger in the PF cohort, this difference did not reach statistical significance (176 vs 143.4 cm2, P = 0.5). Perforator flaps had significantly longer operative times when compared with FFs (237.33 vs 128.99 minutes, P = 0.003). Average length of stay was 6.88 days in FF and 5.33 days in PF (P = 0.624). Complication profile including flap necrosis, wound healing delays, and infection were similar between groups despite a significantly higher rate of prior radiation in the PF cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PFs such as profunda artery perforator and anterolateral thigh flaps are associated with longer operative times but may offer a suitable option for reconstruction of acquired defects of the external genital compared with local FFs, especially in the setting of prior radiation.

Same-Day Mastectomy and Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A 12-Year National Database Analysis and Early Postoperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease of 2019 and rising health care costs have incentivized shorter hospital stays after mastectomies with immediate prosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes following same-day and non-same-day mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2007 to 2019 was performed. Patients who underwent mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with tissue expanders or implants were selected and grouped based on length of stay. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression were performed to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between length-of-stay groups. RESULTS: A total of 45,451 patients were included: 1508 had same-day surgery (SDS) and 43,942 were admitted for 1 or more night (non-SDS). There was no significant difference in overall 30-day postoperative complications between SDS and non-SDS following immediate prosthetic reconstruction. SDS was not a predictor of complications (OR, 1.1; P = 0.346), whereas tissue expander reconstruction decreased odds of morbidity compared with direct-to-implant reconstruction (OR, 0.77; P < 0.001). Among patients who had SDS, smoking was significantly associated with early complications on multivariate analysis (OR, 1.85; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an up-to-date assessment of the safety of mastectomies with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction that captures recent advancements. Postoperative complication rates are similar between same-day discharge and at least 1-night stay, suggesting that same-day procedures may be safe for appropriately selected patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Standardized Perioperative Protocol and Routine Ketorolac Use for Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.

No consensus exists on ideal perioperative management or anticoagulation regimen for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Perceived benefits from antiplatelet therapy need to be balanced against potential complications. Ketorolac, a platelet aggregation inhibitor and a parenteral analgesic, was introduced as part of a standardized perioperative protocol at our institution. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of implementation of this protocol as well as complications associated with the routine use of perioperative ketorolac in a diverse group of patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction. Methods: A single institution retrospective review was performed, including all patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction between October 2016 and November 2019. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received ketorolac as part of a standardized protocol, and those who did not. Results: Twenty-four consecutive patients with 24 head and neck free flaps were evaluated. Eighteen patients were in the standard protocol, and six were not. There were no microvascular thromboses, flap failures, or hematomas in either group. Intensive care unit length of stay and opiate use were significantly reduced in the standardized protocol group. Conclusions: A standardized perioperative protocol for head and neck free flap reconstruction can reduce hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. No statistically significant differences in complication rates were identified when comparing ketorolac use and perioperative regimens among patients undergoing a diverse set of microsurgical head and neck free flap reconstructions.

Adipose Tissue-preserved Skin Grafts for Lower Extremity Defects: Recommendations to Optimize Outcomes.

Adipose tissue-preserved skin grafts (ATPSGs) are full-thickness skin grafts with inclusion of a thin layer of adipose tissue. ATPSGs are recommended for reconstruction of anatomic areas that are cosmetically sensitive and for areas that functionally benefit from additional soft tissue thickness compared to traditional skin grafts. Careful intraoperative technique and postoperative care are mandatory for ATPSG success, given the expected higher metabolic demands compared to traditional grafts. A strict postoperative protocol is especially important after reconstruction of lower extremity defects. METHODS: Detailed descriptions of intraoperative and postoperative care for ATPSG reconstructions are provided. A case is presented displaying lower extremity reconstruction with an ATPSG. The intraoperative technique includes meticulous hemostasis of the recipient site, atraumatic handling of recipient skin edges, anatomical epidermal-to-epidermal reapproximation, avoidance of tissue strangulation during inset, and careful bolster placement. The postoperative protocol after lower extremity reconstruction includes strict elevation, non-weight-bearing status, and eventual dangle protocol. RESULTS: An 85-year-old woman was treated with an ATSG for a middle-third leg resection of squamous cell carcinoma resulting in a 9 × 5 cm defect. The strict postoperative protocol was initiated, but the patient was noncompliant with elevation and weight-bearing restrictions. She had postoperative congestion and epidermolysis that was treated with local wound care without need for additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There are many benefits to ATPSG reconstruction when chosen for the appropriate candidate. The meticulous technique and strict adherence to the postoperative protocol are crucial when these reconstructions are performed. Detailed descriptions of intraoperative and postoperative recommendations to optimize outcomes after ATPSG are presented.

Endoscopic-Assisted Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest: A Novel Technique to Reduce Donor Site Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) remains a workhorse flap but can have significant donor site morbidity. The authors developed a novel technique for endoscopic-assisted RFFF (ERFFF) harvest and hypothesized improved donor site morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating patients who underwent ERFFF or RFFF by a single surgeon for head and neck reconstruction between November 2011 and July 2016; outcomes and complications were compared. A telephone survey was conducted to assess patient satisfaction with donor site appearance and function. RESULTS: Twenty-seven ERFFF and 13 RFFF harvests were performed. The cephalic vein was less commonly incorporated in ERFFF patients compared with RFFF patients (3.70 and 38.46%, respectively, p = 0.0095). ERFFF patients had lower rates of wound healing complications (0% vs. 15.38%, p = 0.10) and perfusion-related complications than RFFF patients (3.70% vs. 23.08%, p = 0.092). Fewer ERFFF patients reported a desire for a more normal appearance (42.86% vs. 71.43%, p = 0.361). The ERFFF group had a higher functional score (64.29% vs. 44.44%, p = 0.101), reporting lower rates of associated discomfort (35.71% vs. 85.71%, p = 0.063). None of the differences in rates of complications or patient-reported outcomes between the groups reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: ERFFF is safe and effective alternative to RFFF, with similar operative time, similar pedicle safety, and elimination of the lengthy forearm incision. Unnecessary cephalic vein dissection can be avoided with endoscopic visualization of the venae comitantes. Further research with a larger sample size and better standardization is needed to assess effects on donor-site morbidity.