Non-invasive cumulus cell analysis can be applied for oocyte ranking and is useful for countries with legal restrictions on embryo generation or freezing.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a strategy for scoring oocyte quality, based on cumulus cell (CC) gene expression, prioritize oocytes with the highest implantation potential, while limiting the number of embryos to be processed in culture and the number of supernumerary embryos to be vitrified? DESIGN: An interventional, blinded, prospective cohort study was retrospectively analyzed. In the original study, patients underwent a fresh Day3 single embryo transfer with embryos ranked based on morphology and CC gene expression (Aurora Test). The additional ranking of the embryos with the Aurora Test resulted in significant higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Now it is investigated if the Aurora Test ranking could be applied to select oocytes. The effect of an Aurora Test based restriction to 2 and 3 2PN or MII oocytes on clinical pregnancy and other outcomes, was analyzed in two subsets of patients with all 2PN (n = 83) or all MII oocytes (n = 45) ranked. RESULTS: Considering only the top three ranked 2PN oocytes, 95% of the patients would have received a fresh SET on Day3 resulting in 65% clinical pregnancies. This was not different from the pregnancy rate obtained in a strategy using all oocytes but significantly reduced the need for vitrification of supernumerary embryos by 3-fold. Considering only top-ranked MII oocytes gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In countries with legal restrictions on freezing of embryos, gene expression of CC can be used for the selective processing of oocytes and would thus decrease the twin pregnancy rate and workload, especially for embryo morphology scoring and transfers as the handling and processing of lower competence oocytes is prevented, while improving the ART outcome.

Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days? DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and January 2021. Overall, 160 patients were randomized, with a 1:1 allocation, into two groups of 80 patients each: group A (7 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation). Both groups received single blastocyst stage embryos on the 6th day of vaginal P4 administration. The primary outcome was the feasibility of such strategy assessed as clinical pregnancy rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and serum hormone levels on the day of FET. Chemical pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks. RESULTS: The analysis included 160 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A or group B on the seventh day of their FET-HRT cycle if the measured endometrial thickness was above 6.5 mm. Following screening failures and of drop-outs, 144 patients were finally included both in group A (75 patients) or group B (69 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The biochemical pregnancy rate was 42.5% and 48.8% for group A and group B, respectively (p 0.526). Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistical difference was observed (36.3% vs 46.3% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.261). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate) were comparable between the two groups for IIT analysis, as well as the P4 values on the day of FET. CONCLUSIONS: In a frozen embryo transfer cycle, performed with artificial preparation of the endometrium, 7 versus 14 days of oestrogen priming are comparable, in terms of clinical pregnancy rate; the advantages of a seven-day protocol include the shorter time to pregnancy, reduced exposure to oestrogens, and more flexibility of scheduling and programming, and less probability to recruit a follicle and have a spontaneous LH surge. It is important to keep in mind that this study was designed as a pilot trial with a limited study population as such it was underpowered to determine the superiority of an intervention over another; larger-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our preliminary results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT03930706.

Electronic witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction laboratory: insights and considerations after 10 years of use.

STUDY QUESTION: What have we learnt after 10 years of electronic witnessing? SUMMARY ANSWER: When applied correctly, an electronic witnessing system can replace manual witnessing in the medically assisted reproduction lab to prevent sample mix-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Electronic witnessing systems have been implemented to improve the correct identification, processing, and traceability of biological materials. When non-matching samples are simultaneously present in a single workstation, a mismatch event is generated to prevent sample mix-up. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This evaluation investigates the mismatch and administrator assign rate over a 10-year period (March 2011-December 2021) with the use of an electronic witnessing system. Radiofrequency identification tags and barcodes were used for patient and sample identification. Since 2011, IVF and ICSI cycles and frozen embryo transfer cycles (FET) were included; IUIs cycles were included since 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The total number of tags and witnessing points were recorded. Witnessing points in a particular electronic witnessing system represent all the actions that have been performed from gamete collection through embryo production, to cryopreservation and transfer. Mismatches and administrator assigns were collected and stratified per procedure (sperm preparation, oocyte retrieval, IVF/ICSI, cleavage stage embryo or blastocyst embryo biopsy, vitrification and warming, embryo transfer, medium changeover, and IUI). Critical mismatches (such as mislabelling or non-matching samples within one work area) and critical administrator assigns (such as samples not identified by the electronic witnessing system and unconfirmed witnessing points) were selected. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 109 655 cycles were included: 53 023 IVF/ICSI, 36 347 FET, and 20 285 IUI cycles. The 724 096 used tags, led to a total of 849 650 witnessing points. The overall mismatch rate was 0.251% (2132/849 650) per witnessing point and 1.944% per cycle. In total, 144 critical mismatches occurred over the different procedures. The yearly mean critical mismatch rate was 0.017 ± 0.007% per witnessing point and 0.129 ± 0.052% per cycle. The overall administrator assign rate was 0.111% (940/849 650) per witnessing point and 0.857% per cycle, including 320 critical administrator assigns. The yearly mean critical administrator assign rate was 0.039 ± 0.010% per witnessing point and 0.301 ± 0.069% per cycle. Overall mismatch and administrator assign rates remained fairly stable during the evaluated time period. Sperm preparation and IVF/ICSI were the procedures most prone to critical mismatch and administrator assigns. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The procedures and methods of integration of an electronic witnessing system may vary from one laboratory to another and result in differences in the potential risks related to sample identification. Individual embryos cannot (yet) be identified by such a system; this makes extra manual witnessing indispensable at certain critical steps where potential errors are not recorded. The electronic witnessing system still needs to be used in combination with manual labelling of both the bottom and lid of dishes and tubes to guarantee correct assignment in case of malfunction or incorrect use of radiofrequency identification tags. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Electronic witnessing is considered to be the ultimate tool to safeguard correct identification of gametes and embryos. But this is only possible when used correctly, and proper training and attention of the staff is required. It may also induce new risks, i.e. blind witnessing of samples by the operator. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was either sought or obtained for this study. J.S. presents webinars on RIW for CooperSurgical. The remaining authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Individualized luteal phase support using additional oral dydrogesterone in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles: is it beneficial?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does additional supplementation with oral dydrogesterone improve reproductive outcomes in patients with low serum progesterone concentrations on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) after artificial (HRT) endometrial preparation? DESIGN: Retrospective, single-centre cohort study including 694 unique patients performing single blastocyst transfer in an HRT cycle. For luteal phase support, intravaginal micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP, 400 mg twice daily) was administered. Serum progesterone concentrations were assessed prior to FET and outco-mes were compared among patients with normal serum progesterone (≥8.8 ng/ml) continuing the routine protocol and patients with low serum progesterone (<8.8 ng/ml) who received additional oral dydrogesterone supplementation (10 mg three times daily) from the day after FET onwards. Primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR), with a multivariate regression model correcting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: Normal serum progesterone concentrations were observed in 547/694 (78.8%) of patients who continued only MVP as planned, whereas low (<8.8 ng/ml) serum progesterone concentrations were detected in 147/694 (21.2%) patients who received additional oral dydrogesterone supplementation on top of MVP from the day after FET onwards. LBR was comparable between both groups: 37.8% for MVP-only versus 38.8% for MVP+OD (P = 0.84). The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that LBR was not significantly associated with the investigated approaches (adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.47, P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that additional oral dydrogesterone supplementation in patients with low serum progesterone concentrations at the moment of transfer could have the potential to rescue reproductive outcomes in HRT-FET cycles. This field of research, however, remains hampered by the absence of randomized controlled trials.

Impact of embryo vitrification on children's health, including growth up to two years of age, in comparison with results following a fresh embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess health outcomes, including growth up to 2 years of age, in children born after embryo vitrification in comparison with children born after fresh embryo transfer. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A single-center university hospital. PATIENT(S): Singletons born after the transfer of vitrified or fresh embryos, either at the cleavage or blastocyst stage between 2014 and 2018, were included. INTERVENTION(S): Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used to study the association between outcomes after vitrified versus fresh embryo transfer, controlling for neonatal, treatment, and maternal characteristics. Subgroup analysis according to cycle protocol (hormone replacement vs. natural cycle) and strategy (freeze-all vs. previous fresh cycle) was also performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Measurements at birth and growth in infancy and childhood, as well as health outcomes, including congenital malformations, interventions, medication use, and hospitalizations are reported. RESULT(S): Birth characteristics were available for 1237 and 2063 children born after embryo vitrification and fresh embryo transfer, respectively. Follow-up data were available for 582 and 757 children at infancy and for 233 and 296 children at 2 years, respectively. Birthweight, height, and head circumference SD scores of children born after embryo vitrification were higher than children born after fresh embryo transfer, even after adjustment for neonatal, treatment, and maternal characteristics. In infancy, weight and height SD scores were larger for children born after embryo vitrification, but not after adjustment for covariates. In childhood, no differences in anthropometry were observed between the groups. Weight and height gain from birth to infancy and from infancy to early childhood were comparable between the groups. Comparable rates of severe developmental problems, hospital admissions, surgical interventions, and of chronic medication use were observed up to the age of 2 years. Subgroup analysis showed that growth parameters were not affected by the cycle protocol or strategy at any age. CONCLUSION(S): Our study indicated that embryo vitrification is associated with higher birthweight, even after controlling for confounders. However, in early childhood, anthropometry and weight and height gain was not different in children born after vitrified or fresh embryo transfer.

Artificially prepared vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles are associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the association between the development of pre-eclampsia and endometrial preparation prior to vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (frozen embryo transfer, FET)? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university-based hospital, including a total of 536 pregnant patients who underwent a FET between 2010 and 2019 and delivered in the same institution; 325 patients underwent natural cycle FET (NC-FET) and 211 artificial cycle FET (AC-FET). RESULTS: Unadjusted, the incidence of pre-eclampsia was significantly higher in AC-FET cycles than in NC-FET cycles (3.7% versus 11.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that, when adjusting for type of endometrial preparation (artificial cycle versus natural cycle), oocyte recipient cycles and African ethnicity, the risk of developing pre-eclampsia was significantly associated with artificial endometrial preparation or oocyte recipient cycles (AC-FET versus NC-FET: odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.0, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The current data show a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia in AC-FET versus NC-FET cycles, adding further strength to the existing data on this topic. Together, these recent findings may result in a change in clinical practice, towards a preference for NC-FET cycles over AC-FET cycles in ovulatory patients. Screening for high-risk patients and the development of strategies to mitigate their risk profile could reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Further understanding of the different vasoactive substances excreted by the corpus luteum is vital.

Improved clinical outcomes after non-invasive oocyte selection and Day 3 eSET in ICSI patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive oocyte quality scoring, based on cumulus gene expression analysis, in combination with morphology scoring, can increase the clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in Day 3 eSET (elective single embryo transfer) ICSI patients. This was first investigated in a pilot study and is now confirmed in a large patient cohort of 633 patients. It was investigated whether CPR, LBR and time-to-pregnancy could be improved by analyzing the gene expression profile of three predictive genes in the cumulus cells, compared to patients with morphology-based embryo selection only. METHODS: A large interventional, non-randomized, assessor-blinded cohort study with 633 ICSI patients was conducted in a tertiary fertility center. Non-PCOS patients, 22-39 years old, with good ovarian reserve, were stimulated with HP-hMG using a GnRH antagonist protocol and planned for fresh Day 3 eSET. The cumulus cells from individually denuded oocytes were ranked by a lab-developed cumulus cell test: qRT-PCR for three predictive genes (CAMK1D, EFNB2 and SASH1) and two control genes (UBC, B2M). The embryo selected for transfer was highest ranked from the pool of morphologically transferable Day 3 embryos. Patients in the control (n = 520) and experimental arm (n = 113) were compared for clinical pregnancy and live birth, using a weighted generalized linear model, and time-to-pregnancy using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The CPR was 61% in the experimental arm (n = 113) vs 29% in the control arm (n = 520, p < 0.0001). The LBR in the experimental arm (50%) was significantly higher than in the control arm (27%,p < 0.0001). Time-to-pregnancy was significantly shortened by 3 transfer cycles independent of the number of embryos available on Day 3 (Kaplan-Meier, p < 0.0001). Cumulus cell tested patients < 35 years (n = 65) or ≥ 35 years (n = 48) had a CPR of 62 and 60% respectively (ns). For cumulus cell tested patients with 2, 3-4, or > 4 transferable embryos, the CPR was 66, 52, and 67% (ns) respectively, and thus independent of the number of transferable embryos on Day 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence of the clinical usefulness of the non-invasive cumulus cell test over time in a larger patient cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03659786 / NCT02962466 (Registered 6Sep2018/11Nov2016, retrospectively registered.

Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children.

STUDY QUESTION: Does double vitrification and warming of human blastocysts having undergone biopsy once or twice have an impact on the clinical outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER: The clinical pregnancy rate obtained with double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts was comparable to that obtained with single vitrification single biopsy blastocysts in our center in the same time period (46%; 2016-2018), whereas that obtained with double-vitrified double-biopsied blastocysts seemed lower and will need further study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Genetic testing on cryopreserved unbiopsied embryos involves two cryopreservation procedures. Retesting of failed/inconclusive-diagnosed blastocysts inevitably involves a second round of biopsy and a second round of vitrification as well. To what extent this practice impacts on the developmental potential of blastocysts has been studied to a limited extent so far and holds controversy. Additionally, the obstetrical/perinatal outcome after the transfer of double-vitrified/single or double-biopsied blastocysts is poorly documented. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective observational study included 97 cycles of trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on vitrified-warmed embryos followed by a second round of vitrification between March 2015 and December 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In 36 warming cycles, no biopsy was performed on the embryos before the first vitrification (single biopsy group). In 61 warming cycles, the embryos had been biopsied on Day 3 (n = 4) or on Day 5/6 (n = 57) before the first vitrification (double biopsy group). A second biopsy was mostly indicated in cycles of failed or inconclusive diagnosis at the first biopsy. Two cycles involved a more specific mutation test for X-linked diseases on male embryos and one cycle involved testing for a second monogenic indication supplementary to a previously tested reciprocal translocation. Post-warming suitability for biopsy, availability of genetically transferable embryos and clinical outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were reported. Neonatal follow-up of the children was included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 91 cleavage-stage embryos and 154 blastocysts were warmed, of which 34 (37.4%) and 126 (81.8%), respectively, were of sufficient quality to undergo trophectoderm biopsy and were subsequently vitrified for a second time. Out of these, 92 underwent biopsy for the first time (single biopsy), whereas 68 underwent a second biopsy (double biopsy). After diagnosis, 77 blastocysts (48.1%) were revealed to be genetically transferable (44 in the single biopsy group and 33 in the double biopsy group). In 46 warming cycles, 51 blastocysts were warmed and 49 survived this second warming procedure (96.0%). Subsequently, there were 45 FET cycles resulting in 27 biochemical pregnancies and 18 clinical pregnancies with fetal heartbeat (40.0% per FET cycle: 44.0% in the single biopsy group and 35.0% in the double biopsy group, P = 0.54). Thirteen singletons were born (eight in the single biopsy group and five in the double biopsy group), while three pregnancies were ongoing. A total of 26 embryos (13 in each group) remain vitrified and have the potential to increase the final clinical pregnancy rate. The neonatal follow-up of the children born so far is reassuring. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a small retrospective cohort, thus, the implantation potential of double vitrification double biopsy blastocysts, as compared to double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts and standard PGT (single vitrification, single biopsy), certainly needs further investigation. Although one could speculate on birthweight being affected by the number of biopsies performed, the numbers in this study are too small to compare birthweight standard deviation scores in singletons born after single or double biopsy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: PGT on vitrified-warmed embryos, including a second vitrification-warming step, results in healthy live birth deliveries, for both single- and double-biopsied embryos. The neonatal follow-up of the 13 children born so far did not indicate any adverse effect. The present study is important in order to provide proper counseling to couples on their chance of a live birth per initial warming cycle planned and concerning the safety issue of rebiopsy and double vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The freeze-all strategy versus agonist triggering with low-dose hCG for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI for high responders: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the freeze-all strategy in high-responders increase pregnancy rates and improve safety outcomes when compared with GnRH agonist triggering followed by low-dose hCG intensified luteal support with a fresh embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Pregnancy rates after either fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support using low-dose hCG or the freeze-all strategy did not vary significantly; however, moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred more frequently in the women who attempted a fresh embryo transfer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Two strategies following GnRH agonist triggering (the freeze-all approach and a fresh embryo transfer attempt using a low-dose of hCG for intensified luteal phase support) are safer alternatives when compared with conventional hCG triggering with similar pregnancy outcomes. However, these two strategies have never been compared head-to-head in an unrestricted predicted hyper-responder population. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study included women with an excessive response to ovarian stimulation (≥18 follicles measuring ≥11 mm) undergoing IVF/ICSI in a GnRH antagonist suppressed cycle between 2014 and 2017. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy at 7 weeks after the first embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included live birth and the development of moderate-to-severe OHSS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Following GnRH agonist triggering, women were randomized either to cryopreserve all good-quality embryos followed by a frozen embryo transfer in an subsequent artificial cycle or to perform a fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support (1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval, plus oral estradiol 2 mg two times a day, plus 200 mg of micronized vaginal progesterone three times a day). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 212 patients (106 in each arm) were recruited in the study, with three patients (one in the fresh embryo transfer group and two in the freeze-all group) later withdrawing their consent to participate in the study. One patient in the freeze-all group became pregnant naturally (clinical pregnancy diagnosed 38 days after randomization) prior to the first frozen embryo transfer. The study arms did not vary significantly in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos produced/transferred. The intention to treat clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (with the latter excluding four cases lost to follow-up: one in the fresh transfer and three in the freeze-all arms, respectively) after the first embryo transfer did not vary significantly among the fresh embryo transfer and freeze-all study arms: 51/105 (48.6%) versus 57/104 (54.8%) and 41/104 (39.4%) versus 42/101 (41.6%), respectively (relative risk for clinical pregnancy 1.13, 95% CI 0.87-1.47; P = 0.41). However, moderate-to-severe OHSS occurred solely in the group that received low-dose hCG (9/105, 8.6%, 95% CI 3.2% to 13.9% vs 0/104, 95% CI 0 to 3.7, P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size calculation was based on a 19% absolute difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rates, therefore smaller differences, as observed in the trial, cannot be reliably excluded as non-significant. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study offers the first comparative analysis of two common strategies applied to women performing IVF/ICSI with a high risk to develop OHSS. While pregnancy rates did not vary significantly, a fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support may still not avoid the risk of moderate-to-severe OHSS and serious consideration should be made before recommending it as a routine first-line treatment. Future trials may allow us to confirm these findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. No external funding was obtained for this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02148393. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 28 May 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 30 May 2014.

Frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer after 6 or 7 days of progesterone administration: impact on live birth rate in hormone replacement therapy cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To study the difference in live birth rate (LBR) between frozen-warmed blastocyst transfer (FET) on the 6th or the 7th day of progesterone administration in artificially prepared cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary university-based referral hospital. PATIENT(S): Patients who underwent FET between December 2015 and December 2017 in a hormone replacement therapy cycle (HRT). INTERVENTION(S): Group A included all eligible patients who underwent transfer of a vitrified-warmed blastocyst on the 6th day of progesterone administration; group B included patients who underwent blastocyst transfer on the 7th day of progesterone. The artificial HRT protocol in this study consisted of estrogen administration at a dose of 2 mg twice daily for 7 days followed by 2 mg three times daily for 6 days and micronized vaginal progesterone 200 mg three times daily from an adequately considered endometrial thickness onward. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate. RESULTS: The study included 619 patients, 346 in group A and 273 in group B. The LBRs were comparable between both groups (36.6% for group A and group B), even after adjustment for confounding factors (adjusted odds ratio 1.073, 95% confidence interval 0.740-1.556). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher miscarriage rates for day 6 blastocysts transferred on the 6th day of progesterone supplementation compared with transfer on the 7th day of progesterone supplementation (50.0% versus 21.4%, respectively). Additionally, there was a tendency toward a higher LBR when the 7-day progesterone supplementation protocol was used for transfer of a day 6 blastocyst (21.5% and 35.5% for group A and group B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Warmed blastocyst transfer on the 6th compared with the 7th day of progesterone administration in an HRT cycle results in similar LBR. Subgroup analysis of day 6 blastocysts showed significantly higher miscarriage rates when FET was performed on the 6th day of progesterone administration.

Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Does extended culture to the blastocyst stage affect singleton birthweight after either fresh or vitrified-warmed embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Singleton birthweight z-scores did not vary significantly after a fresh blastocyst transfer, whereas the additional effect of vitrification remains inconclusive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Observational studies have associated extended culture with an increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight. On the contrary, in terms of birthweight and gestational age, singletons born after vitrification have been associated with a better perinatal outcome when compared to those born following a fresh transfer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our post-hoc cohort analysis on neonatal outcomes included 447 liveborn singletons was derived from a recent retrospective analysis on cumulative live birth rates after cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfers. These babies were born following a fresh single cleavage-stage transfer (FCT Day 3, n = 113), fresh single blastocyst transfer (FBT Day 5, n = 218), vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage transfer (VCT Day 3, n = 58) or vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT Day 5, n = 58). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Singleton birthweight was the primary outcome measure. Gestational age and gender of the newborn were accounted for by using birthweight z-scores in a multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusting for other confounders (maternal age, BMI, parity and smoking behaviour). Vanishing twins were excluded from the analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A significantly lower z-score was observed after blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in the vitrified-warmed Day 5 group (P = 0.013), a difference not observed in the fresh transfer groups (P = 0.32). Following multivariable regression analysis [adjusted regression coefficient (95% confidence interval)], the FCT and FBT groups showed no significant influence on the birthweight z-scores after fresh transfer [-0.19 (-0.44; 0.05)], but the transfer of vitrified blastocysts (VBT) was associated with a lower birthweight [-0.52 (-0.90; -0.15)] compared with the transfer of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos (VCT). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The present cohort was relatively small, especially in the vitrified-warmed subgroups. Pregnancy-associated factors possibly influencing birthweight (such as diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia) were also not accounted for in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Different ART procedures, including extended culture and vitrification, may hold potential safety issues. These results require further confirmation in future larger studies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The effect of an immediate frozen embryo transfer following a freeze-all protocol: a retrospective analysis from two centres.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the timing of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist triggering with the elective cryopreservation of all embryos affect pregnancy outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER: FETs performed immediately after a freeze-all cycle did not vary significantly from delayed FETs in terms of pregnancy rates. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: As interest in, and use of, the freeze-all strategy expands in the field of reproductive medicine, the optimal timing to perform the subsequent FET has become increasingly important. Thus far, all clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the segmentation strategy have opted to electively defer the first FET for at least one menstrual cycle. However, this mere empirical approach may cause unnecessary distress to infertile patients eager to conceive as soon as possible. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This retrospective cohort study included the first FET cycle of all women who underwent a freeze-all protocol between October 2010 and October 2015 in two reproductive medicine centres (in Belgium and Vietnam, respectively). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: A total of 333 FET cycles were included in the analysis. Following the freeze-all cycle, the preparation of the endometrium consisted of the sequential administration of oestradiol valerate and micronized vaginal progesterone. The start of the FET was classified as either immediate (following the GnRH agonist withdrawal bleeding) or delayed (by at least one menstrual cycle). Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was the main outcome of our study. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Women in the immediate FET group were slightly younger on average (30.9 ± 4.1 versus 31.8 ± 4.3, P = 0.045) on the date of oocyte retrieval. Moreover, women in the immediate FET group received a blastocyst transfer more frequently (53.4% versus 41.6%, P = 0.038) and had fewer embryos transferred on average compared to the delayed FET group (1.8 ± 0.8 versus 2.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.013). CPR/FET was marginally significantly higher in the immediate FET group in our crude analysis (52.9% after immediate FET versus 41.6% after delayed FET, P = 0.046). In order to assess if CPR/FET remained unaltered after adjusting for measured confounding, we performed mixed-effects multivariable regression analysis. Timing of the FET no longer affected significantly the CPR of the first FET in the adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38-1.00; predicted CPR of 52.5% for immediate FET versus 41.8% for delayed FET). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results are limited by the retrospective design and the potential for unmeasured confounding. Furthermore, we only evaluated the effect of the FET timing of the first FET on CPRs in artificially supplemented cycles and, thus, the results should not be extrapolated to live birth rates or natural-cycle FETs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study offers a simple but potentially relevant measure to increase patient satisfaction and adherence in couples who seek to become pregnant both safely and as soon as possible. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle.

STUDY QUESTION: Do cumulative live birth rates differ between single cleavage-stage Day 3 transfer and single blastocyst-stage Day 5 transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cumulative live birth rates after Day 3 and 5 transfers were similar in young patients when the vitrified embryo transfers were also taken into account. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous evidence has shown that the probability of live birth following IVF with a fresh embryo transfer is significantly higher after blastocyst-stage Day 5 transfer. However, because the introduction of vitrification has enhanced the survival of cryopreserved embryos and improved pregnancy rates, the optimal outcome measure for this comparison should now be cumulative live birth rates, as these include the eventual contribution of vitrified-warmed embryos. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our retrospective study included first IVF/ICSI cycles performed between January 2010 and December 2013 at a tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients were scheduled for fresh single embryo transfer, either on Day 3 (n = 377) or on Day 5 (n = 623). Both IVF and ICSI cycles were included and the sperm used were either fresh or frozen partner ejaculates, or frozen donor ejaculates. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth (after 24 weeks) rate per started cycle, including the eventual contribution of vitrification until the birth of a first child. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Live birth rates per started cycle were significantly lower after transferring the fresh single cleavage-stage embryo, compared to a blastocyst (31.3% and 37.8%, respectively, P = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of embryo transfers necessary until the first live birth was significantly lower for blastocyst-stage embryos (P < 0.001). However, the cumulative live birth rates were 52.6% for cleavage-stage and 52.5% for blastocyst-stage transfers (P = 0.989). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The extrapolation of the results is limited by the retrospective nature of the study. Furthermore, the analysis was restricted to patients under 36 years of age undergoing their first treatment cycle. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These results deserve further clinical consideration in terms of time and cost efficiency. A subsequent analysis of the neonatal outcomes is necessary to confirm the safety of treatment cycles using extended culture. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was received and there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates following frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the effect of vitamin D deficiency on the pregnancy rates following frozen embryo transfer (FET)?. SUMMARY ANSWER: Vitamin D deficiency does not affect pregnancy rates in FET cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although there is evidence that the potential impact of vitamin D deficiency on reproductive outcome may be mediated through a detrimental effect on oocyte or embryo quality, the rationale of our design was based on evidence derived from basic science, suggesting that vitamin D may have a key role in endometrial receptivity and implantation. Only few retrospective clinical studies have been published to date with conflicting results. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study is the first prospective observational cohort study from the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels. The duration of the study was 1 year. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 280 consecutive patients, who had at least one blastocyst frozen and were planned for a FET, were enrolled in the study following detailed information and signing of a written informed consent. Serum analysis of 25-OH vitamin D was measured on the day of embryo transfer, and the impact of vitamin deficiency was investigated on reproductive outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among all patients, 45.3% (n = 127) had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/ml), and 54.6% (n = 153) had vitamin D levels ≥20 ng/ml. Positive human chorionic gonadotrophin rates were similar among patients with vitamin D deficiency and women with total serum 25-OH vitamin D levels ≥20 ng/ml (40.9 versus 48.3%, P = 0.2). Similarly, no difference was found in clinical pregnancy rates in women with vitamin D deficiency [32.2% (41/127)] compared with those with higher vitamin D levels [37.9% (58/153)]; P = 0.3. When analyzing the results according to different thresholds, as proposed by the Endocrine Society, clinical pregnancy rates were comparable between vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/ml), vitamin D insufficient (20-30 ng/ml) and vitamin D replete women (≥30 ng/ml) [32.3% (41/127) versus 39.5% (36/91) versus 35.5% (22/62), respectively, P = 0.54]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that vitamin D status is not related to pregnancy outcome. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Ethnicity in relation to vitamin D status was not assessed, given that the vast majority of patients included in our study were Caucasian, whereas we did only assess 25-OH vitamin D levels and not bioavailable vitamin D. Furthermore, although we failed to find a difference between vitamin D deficient women and women with vitamin D levels ≥20 ng/ml, we need to underscore that our study was powered to detect a difference of 15% in clinical pregnancy rates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Vitamin D deficiency does not significantly impair pregnancy rates among infertile women undergoing frozen-thawed cycles. The measurement of vitamin D levels in this population should not be routinely recommended. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.

To delay or not to delay a frozen embryo transfer after a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if increasing the interval between a failed fresh embryo transfer and a subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle has any effect on clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-based tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Women who underwent at least one FET after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt from January 2010 to November 2014. We divided our sample according to the "timing" of the first FET (TF-FET), defined by the interval between oocyte retrieval and the FET cycle start date. The start of the FET was classified as either immediate (≤22 days after oocyte retrieval) or delayed (>22 days after oocyte retrieval). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): CPR after the first FET. RESULT(S): A total of 1,183 FET cycles (performed in 1,087 women) were included in our study. No significant differences were found between the immediate and delayed FET groups regarding age, number of oocytes retrieved, number of good-quality embryos produced, embryo developmental stage at FET, and number of frozen embryos transferred. Most importantly, the CPRs of the first FET did not differ significantly according to the TF-FET (32.5% after immediate FET vs. 31.7% after delayed FET), even after adjusting for potential confounding with the use of multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION(S): FETs performed immediately after fresh IVF cycles had CPRs similar to those postponed to a later time. Therefore, deferring FETs may unnecessarily prolong time to pregnancy.

Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates in women undergoing single embryo, blastocyst stage, transfer (SET) for IVF/ICSI.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the influence of vitamin D deficiency on pregnancy rates among women undergoing IVF/ICSI and Day 5 (blastocyst stage) single embryo transfer (SET)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Vitamin D deficiency results in significantly lower pregnancy rates in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Preliminary experiments have identified the presence of vitamin D receptors in the female reproductive system. However, results regarding the effect of vitamin D deficiency on clinical outcomes are conflicting. None of the previous studies adopted a SET strategy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Serum vitamin D concentration was measured retrospectively in patients who underwent SET on Day 5. Overall 368 consecutive infertile women treated within a period of 15 months were included in the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All patients underwent ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI and Day 5 SET. Serum samples were obtained 7 days prior to embryo transfer and stored frozen at -20°C. Samples were collectively analyzed for their 25-OH vitamin D content. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25-OH vitamin D levels <20 ng/ml in accordance with the Institute of Medicine and the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly lower in women with vitamin D deficiency compared with those with higher vitamin D values (41 versus 54%, P = 0.015).Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify whether vitamin D deficiency is independently associated with clinical pregnancy rates after controlling for 16 potential confounding factors. According to our results vitamin D deficiency was independently associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates, odds ratios [ORs (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 (0.39-0.95)] for vitamin D deficiency (deficient versus non-deficient women), P = 0.030. Finally, even when restricting our analysis to women undergoing elective SET (274 patients), vitamin D deficiency was again independently associated with pregnancy rates [OR (95% CI) 0.56 (0.33-0.93), P = 0.024]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our results refer only to patients undergoing Day 5 SET. Although vitamin D deficiency appears to compromise pregnancy rates in this population, no guidance can be provided regarding a potential relationship between vitamin D deficiency and ovarian reserve or response to ovarian stimulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Vitamin D deficiency impairs pregnancy rates in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer. Future prospective confirmatory studies are needed to validate our results and examine the exact underlying mechanism by which vitamin D levels may impair pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None declared.

A "freeze-all" embryo strategy after in vitro maturation: a novel approach in women with polycystic ovary syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of a "freeze-all" embryo strategy after immature oocyte retrieval (OR) and in vitro maturation (IVM) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTINGS: University-based tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Seventy-nine consecutive PCOS patients undergoing IVM followed by vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (ET) over a 2-year period. INTERVENTION(S): All patients received 150 IU/d highly purified hMG for 3 consecutive days. There was no hCG trigger given before OR. All day-3 embryos of good morphologic quality were vitrified. Single or double ET was performed in 114 consecutive artificial cycles. The cumulative live birth rate (LBR) per patient was calculated, as well as the projected cumulative LBR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LBR per patient and per retrieved immature oocyte. RESULT(S): Mean age, body mass index, and antimüllerian hormone were 28.5 ± 3.5 years, 27.8 ± 7.1 kg/m(2), and 10.3 ± 5.5 µg/L, respectively. In total, 1,526 cumulus-oocyte complexes were retrieved. IVM yielded 800 metaphase II oocytes (52.4%), and 291 day-3 embryos were cryopreserved. Of these, 224 (76.9%) embryos were warmed. One hundred seventy-one survived (76.3%), and 105 ETs were performed. LBR per ET was 16.2% and the cumulative LBR per patient was 21.8%. LBR per retrieved immature oocyte was 1.1%. The projected LBR per patient was 24.2%. CONCLUSION(S): IVM followed by a "freeze-all" embryo strategy is a novel approach for women with PCOS. Patients who undergo IVM should be advised that each immature oocyte retrieved yields a 1.1% chance to achieve a live birth.

Pregnancy prediction in single embryo transfer cycles after ICSI using QPCR: validation in oocytes from the same cohort.

Cumulus cell (CC) gene expression is being explored as an additional method to morphological scoring to choose the embryo with the highest chance to pregnancy. In 47 ICSI patients with single embryo transfer (SET), from which individual CC samples had been stored, 12 genes using QPCR were retrospectively analyzed. The CC samples were at the same occasion also used to validate a previously obtained pregnancy prediction model comprising three genes (ephrin-B2 (EFNB2), calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase ID, stanniocalcin 1). Latter validation yielded a correct pregnant/non-pregnant classification in 72% of the samples. Subsequently, 9 new genes were analyzed on the same samples and new prediction models were built. Out of the 12 genes analyzed a combination of the best predictive genes was obtained by stepwise multiple regression. One model retained EFNB2 in combination with glutathione S-transferase alpha 3 and 4, progesterone receptor and glutathione peroxidase 3, resulting in 93% correct predictions when 3 patient and treatment cycle characteristics were included into the model. This large patient group allowed to do an intra-patient analysis for 7 patients, an analysis mimicking the methodology that would ultimately be used in clinical routine. CC related to a SET that did not give pregnancy and CC related to their subsequent frozen/thawed embryos which ended in pregnancy were analyzed. The models obtained in the between-patient analysis were used to rank the oocytes within-patients for their chance to pregnancy and resulted in 86% of correct predictions. In conclusion, prediction models built on selected quantified transcripts in CC might help in the decision making process which is currently only based on subjective embryo morphology scoring. The validity of our current models for routine application still need prospective assessment in a larger and more diverse patient population allowing intra-patient analysis.

Should a single blastocyst transfer policy be a clinical decision or should it depend on the embryological evaluation on day 3?

BACKGROUND: Single blastocyst transfer has the advantage of maximizing the fresh single pregnancy rate. However, in patients with a low number of good quality embryos on day 3, it remains unclear whether immediate embryo transfer or further embryo culture with blastocyst transfer is the most preferable option. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in which the outcome of 590 fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles over a 15 months period and their cryo cycles were analyzed. A total of 341 patients cycles had an elective day 5 strategy independent of intermediate embryo evaluation while another 249 patients underwent a day 5 embryo transfer only if at least four embryos were available on day 3. Blastocyst vitrification was performed using a closed high security system. RESULTS: Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the elective day 5 group had a lower fresh transfer rate (90.62% vs. 95.18%, p < 0.05) as compared to patients with a day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer policy. No difference was observed in the fresh live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (32.84% vs. 28.92%; 1.17% vs 0%) The projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate compensating for double counting in case subjects have more than one pregnancy is not different (42.58% vs. 39.84%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower fresh transfer rates, elective single blastocyst transfer yields a similar projected cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate as in a policy with cleavage stage or blastocyst transfer depending on a good quality embryo count on day 3.