Complications of severe breast deformities after a silicone injection over 20-year and a successful surgical treatment.

Breast deformities caused by silicone injections affect aesthetic results and cause irreversible complications in patients. In the treatment, it is necessary to entirely remove silicone particles and infiltrated and fibrous breast tissues. The maximal preservation of healthy breast tissues is also critical. This report presents a case of severe breast deformities as complications 20 years after silicone injections at an unreputable aesthetic center. During the surgery, the authors separately removed fluid (silicone) masses and reconstructed mammary glandular tissues. Breast reconstruction was performed by the anchor breast lift along with the functional preservation of the nipple-areola complex and the superomedial pedicle. The surgery entirely addressed complications after injecting a large amount of silicone. 6 months postoperatively, the surgical outcomes were satisfactory. The surgical excision should be done to remove silicone-infiltrated tissues as much as possible before the reconstructive surgery. The combination of radical surgical excision and reconstructive surgery using the anchor breast lift as a single-stage procedure brought good aesthetic results.

Complicated Surgical Site Infection with Mycobacterium Abscessus After Liposuction and Affections of Corticosteroids in the Treatment Regimen: Three Cases Report and a Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Mycobacterium abscessus infection after liposuction/fat grafting is a rare complication that is hard to diagnose and treat. Misdiagnosis could result in treatment failure and prolonged hospital stays. The paradoxical reaction is another complication that rarely occurs in non-HIV patients infected with nontuberculosis mycobacteria. This study reported 3 cases infected with M. abscessus complicated by the paradoxical reaction after liposuction and fat grafting. It highlighted characteristics giving clues of the paradoxical reaction and a successful strategy. Also, a systematic review was conducted to comprehensively provide varied aspects of M. abscessus infection after liposuction and/or fat grafting. METHODS: Three cases were retrospectively included reporting data characteristics of patients, cosmetic procedures, and treatment strategy. PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Global Health Library (GHL) were searched to find and include cases with M. abscessus infection after liposuction and/or fat grafting based on defined selection criteria. Relevant data were extracted and summarized. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the systematic review. Symptoms often developed approximately 1 month after the cosmetic surgery. Culture, AFB, and PCR were common methods of diagnosis of M. abscessus after liposuction and/or fat grafting. It took about 33 days on average from the presentation to isolate and detect the pathogens. Antibiotics based on susceptibility testing results along with surgical interventions were effective methods of treatment. Our three cases which were complicated by the paradox were addressed by adding methylprednisolone for 2 weeks to the macrolide-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of this disease should be widely raised among physicians for early diagnosis and proper treatments. Cultures of specimens and AFB should be repeated many times before excluding the possibility of Mycobacterium spp. A paradoxical reaction should be suspected if the symptoms were worse after the antibiotic therapy based on susceptibility testing results and proper surgical interventions, especially if patients had taken corticosteroids before being admitted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .